Talk:Shyla Foxxx

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Based upon the criteria in those boxes that appeared here in the discussion forum, the issues for legitimacy of this article have been addressed. Please do remove the doom-filled warning hanging over this entry when possible.

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ]

Has the issue regarding the eligibility of this entry been sufficiently addressed?

I worked to create the article after clicking on the actresses name, which was an active hyperlink in the "Taboo" film series entry, and finding only a page inviting someone to start an article. After seeing the warning of exorcism--surprising both for its almost immediate application, as well because I thought wikipedia was about the patient accumulation of information on these entries--I attempted to buttress the information with some viable links, information, and references that would, I hope, provide the foundations of accreditation for this cult-status starlet. The foundations: I don't presume to know everything about this person, but she was a figure of interest in the history of adult film, and I would like to know more from what information might build over time. That's how this works, right? Or no. Having compared the article in its current form to multiple entries for other pornstars, as well as entries from other genres, it is certainly not as thorough and developed as many, but certainly already more developed and arranged than many (many that do not share the scarlet letter of impending doom).

Thanks for clarifying the validity-of and correcting the presence-of the boxcover images. Would it be ok to use a non-pornographic vidcap of her face instead?