Shuowen Jiezi
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Shuowen Jiezi (Chinese: 說文解字/说文解字; Wade-Giles: Shuo-wen chieh-tzu; "Explaining Simple and Analyzing Compound Characters") was an early 2nd century CE Chinese dictionary from the Han Dynasty. It was the first comprehensive Chinese character dictionary, the first to analyze the components and etymology of the characters, as well as the first to use the principle of organization by sections with shared components, called section headers (bùshǒu 部首).
Contents |
[edit] Circumstances of compilation
Xu Shen, a famous Han scholar of the Five Classics, compiled the Shuowen Jiezi. He finished editing it in 100 CE, but due to an unfavorable imperial attitude towards scholarship, he waited until 121 CE before having his son Xǚ Chōng (許沖) present it to Emperor An of Han along with a memorial.
In defining words and analyzing their etymology and construction, Xǔ Shèn strove to disambiguate the meaning of the pre-Han Classics, so as to render their usage by government unquestioned and bring about order, and in the process also deeply imbued his organization and analyses with his philosophy on characters and the universe. Xu's compilation of the Shuowen, says Boltz (1993:430), "cannot be held to have arisen from a purely linguistic or lexicographical drive." His motives were more pragmatic and political. During the Han era, the prevalent theory of language was Confucianist Rectification of Names, the belief that using the correct names for things was essential for proper government. The postface (xù 敘) to the Shuowen Jiezi explains: "Now the written language is the foundation of classical learning, the source of kingly government." (tr. Thern 1968:17). Compare how the postface describes the legendary invention of writing for governmental rather than for communicative purposes:
Cang Jie 倉頡, scribe for the Yellow Emperor, on looking at the tracks of the feet of birds and animals, realizing that the patterns and forms were distinguishable, started to create graphs, so that all kinds of professions could be regulated, and all people could be kept under scrutiny. (tr. Thern 1966:8-9)
Pre-Shuowen Chinese dictionaries like the Erya and the Fangyan were limited lists of synonyms loosely organized by semantic categories, which made it difficult to look up characters. Xu Shen analytically organized characters in the comprehensive Shuowen Jiezi through their shared graphic components, which Boltz (1993:431) calls "a major conceptual innovation in the understanding of the Chinese writing system."
[edit] Textual organization
The title of the work draws a basic distinction between two types of characters, wén 文 and zì 字, the former being those composed of a single graphic element (such as shān 山 "mountain"), and the latter being those containing more than one such element (such as hǎo 好 "good" with 女 "woman" and 子 "child") which can be deconstructed into and analyzed in terms of their component elements. Thus, Shuōwén Jiězì means "commenting on" (shuō "speak; talk; comment; explain") the wén, which cannot be deconstructed, and "analyzing" (jiě "untie; separate; divide; analyze; explain; deconstruct") the zì.
Xu Shen categorized Chinese characters into 540 sections, under "section headers" (bùshǒu, commonly called radicals); these are characters or extracted strokes or portions thereof, which also serve as components shared by all the characters in that section. The number of section headers, 540, numerologically equals 6 × 9 × 10, the product of the symbolic numbers of Yīn and Yáng and the number of the Heavenly Stems. The first section header was 一 (yī "one; first") and the last was 亥 (hài "the last character of the Earthly Branches"). Xu's choice of sections appears in large part to have been driven by the desire to create an unbroken, systematic sequence among the headers themselves, such that each had a natural, intuitive relationship (e.g., structural, semantic or phonetic) with the ones before and after, as well as by the desire to reflect cosmology. In the process, he included many section headers that are not considered ones today, such as 炎 (yán "flame") and 熊 (xióng "bear"), which modern dictionaries list under the 火 or 灬 (huǒ "fire") heading. He also included as section headers all the sexagenary cycle characters, that is, the ten Heavenly Stems and twelve Earthly Branches. As a result, unlike modern dictionaries which attempt to maximize the number of characters under each section header, 34 Shuowen headers have no characters under them, while 159 have only one each. From a modern lexicographical perspective, Xu's system of 540 headings can seem "enigmatic" and "illogical" (Thern 1966:4). Why, for instance, did he include the singular section header 409 惢 (ruǐ "doubt"), with only one rare character (ruǐ 繠 "stamen"), instead of listing it under the common header 408 心 (xīn "heart; mind")?
The Shuowen Jiezi is often mistakenly cited as the origin of the "Six-Principles Theory of Chinese character composition" (liùshū 六書 "six graphs"); however (see Chinese character classification), several earlier books mention it. Xu Shen's postface describes the Six Principles and his dictionary systematizes them. He uses the first two, simple indicatives (zhǐshì 指事) and pictograms (xiàngxíng 象形) to explicitly label the dictionary's character entries, e.g., in the typical pattern of "(character) (definition) ...simple indicative" (A B 也...指事 (也)). Logographs belonging to the third principle, phono-semantic compound characters (aka picto-phonetic compounds, xíngshēng 形聲), are implicitly identified through the entry pattern "from A, B phonetic" (A...從 B, C 聲), meaning that element B plays a semantic role in A, while C gives the sound. The fourth type, compound indicatives (huìyì 會意), are sometimes identified by the pattern "A...from X from Y" (A...從 X 從 Y), meaning that the compound A is given meaning through the graphic combination and interaction of both constituent elements. The last two of the six principles, borrowed characters (aka phonetic loan, jiǎjiè 假借) and derived characters (zhuǎnzhù 轉注), are not identifiable in the character definitions, as they are not principles of structural composition.
[edit] Contents and importance
Xu Shen states in his postface that the Shuowen has 9,353 character entries, plus 1,163 graphic variants, with a total length of 133,441 characters. The transmitted texts vary slightly in content, owing to omissions and emendations by commentators (especially Xú Xuàn, see below), and modern editions have 9,431 characters and 1,279 variants.
Xu originally wrote the Shuowen Jiezi in seal script (specifically xiǎozhuàn 小篆 "small seal") characters that were standardized during the Qín dynasty. He frequently included two kinds of variant graphs, which he termed "ancient script" (gǔwén 古文)) or "Zhòu script" (Zhòuwén 籀文). The "ancient" characters have been conclusively shown to be regional variant forms from the Eastern Warring States, contemporaneous with the pre-unification Qín seal script, and Xu only included these "ancient" variants when they differed from standard seal. The "Zhòu" characters, now usually called large seal script (dàzhuàn 大篆 "large seal"), are associated with the no-longer extant Shĭ Zhòu Piān (史籀篇), an early copybook traditionally said to have been written by Shĭ Zhòu, an official in the court of King Xuan of Zhou (r. 827 BCE- 782 BCE). While scholars agree this piān means "compilation; chapters", they disagree about how to read Shĭ Zhòu. The title of this ancient text could translate as: "Compilation by Shi Zhou" if it was a proper name; or "Compilation by Historian Zhou" if shĭ meant "scribe; recorder; historian"; or "Compilation Written by the Historian" if zhoù verbally meant "write". Xu Shen did not know it at the time, but this "Zhoù script" dated from the late Western Zhōu Dynasty (note that Zhòu 籀 (the script) and Zhōu 周 (the dynasty)are unrelated words), and the "Zhoù script" was thus much older than the Warring States and Qin forms that he was analyzing. Later handwritten Shuowen versions copied the seal and ancient graphs, but wrote the definitions in the script of the day, clerical script or later standard script.
The typical Shuowen format for a character entry consists of a seal graph; a short definition (usually a single synonym, occasionally punning like in the Shiming), pronunciation given by citing a homophone, and analysis of compound graphs into semantic and/or phonetic components. Individual entries can additionally include graphic variants, secondary definitions, information on regional usages, citations from pre-Han texts, and further phonetic information, especially in dúruò (度若 "read like") notations (see Coblin 1978).
Although the Shuowen Jiezi has incalculable value to scholars and was traditionally used as the most important Chinese etymological dictionary, since many of its analyses and definitions are unclear or incorrect, it cannot be relied upon as a single, authoritative source for definitions and graphic etymologies. Furthermore, Xu Shen lacked access to oracle bone script from the Shāng Dynasty and bronzeware script from the Shang and Western Zhou Dynasty to which scholars now have access, and these are often critical for understanding the structures and origins of logographs. For instance, he put lǜ (慮 "be concerned; consider") under the section heading 思 (sī "think") and noted it had a phonetic of hǔ (虍 "tiger"). However, the early bronze graphs for lǜ (慮) have the xīn (心 "heart") semantic component and a lǚ (呂 "a musical pitch") phonetic, also seen in early forms of lǔ (盧 "vessel; hut") and lǔ (虜 "captive").
[edit] Textual history and scholarship
Although the original Han Dynasty Shuōwén Jiězì text has been lost, it was transmitted through handwritten copies for centuries. The oldest extant traces of it are some manuscript fragments from the Tang Dynasty, amounting to about 2% of the entire text. The earliest post-Han scholar known to have researched and emended this dictionary, albeit badly, was Li Yangbing (Li Yang-ping, 李陽冰, fl. 765-80), who "is usually regarded as something of a bête noire of [Shuowen] studies," writes Boltz (1993:435), "owing to his idiosyncratic and somewhat capricious editing of the text."
Shuowen scholarship improved greatly during the Song Dynasty and Qing Dynasty periods. The most important Song scholars were the Xú brothers, Xú the Elder (Xú Xuàn, Hsü Hsüan, 徐鉉, 916-991) and Xú the Younger (Xú Kǎi, Hsü K'ai, 徐鍇, 920-74). In 986, Emperor Taizong of Song ordered the Xu brothers and other editors to publish an authoritative edition of the dictionary. Xu Xuan's textual criticism has been especially vital for all subsequent scholarship, since his restoration of the damage done by Li Yangbing resulted in the closest version we have to the original, and the basis for all later editions. His brother, in turn, focused on exegetical study, analyzing the meaning of Xu Shen's text, appending supplemental characters, and adding fanqie pronunciation glosses for each entry. Philology flourished during the Qing Dynasty. Some Shuowen scholars, like Zhū Jùnshēng (Chu Chün-sheng, 朱駿聲, 1788-1858), followed the textual criticism model of Xu Xuan. Others, like Guì Fù (Kuei Fu, 桂馥, 1736-1805) and Wáng Yún (Wang Yün, 王筠, 1784-1834), followed the analytical exegesis model of Xu Kai. One Qing scholar, Duàn Yùcái (Tuan Yü-ts'ai, 段玉裁), stands above all the others due to the quality of his research in both areas. His annotated Shuowen edition is the one most commonly used by students today.
Scholarship in the 20th century offered new understandings and accessibility. Ding Fubao (Ting Fu-pao, 丁福保, 1874-1952) collected all available Shuowen materials, clipped and arranged them in the original dictionary order, and photolithographically printed a colossal edition. Notable advances in Shuowen research have been made by Chinese and Western scholars like Ma Zonghuo ( Ma Tsung-huo, 馬宗霍), Ma Xulun (Ma Hsü-lun, 馬敘倫), William G. Boltz, W. South Coblin, Paul L.M. Serruys, Roy A. Miller, and K.L. Thern.
[edit] See also
[edit] External links
- 《说文解字注》 全文检索 - 许慎撰 段玉裁注
- 《說文解字》全文檢索測試版 - 許愼撰 徐鉉
- Online dictionary with shuowen's definitions
- Shuōwén Jiězì radical chart (Japanese)
- Shuowen jiezi 說文解字 – Chinaknowledge
[edit] References
Boltz, William G. (1993). "Shuo wen chieh tzu", p.429-442 in Loewe, Michael (ed.). Early Chinese Texts: A Bibliographical Guide, (Early China Special Monograph Series No. 2), Society for the Study of Early China, and the Institute of East Asian Studies, University of California, Berkeley, ISBN 1-55729-043-1.)
Coblin, W. South. (1978), "The initials of Xu Shen's language as reflected in the Shuowen duruo glosses," Journal of Chinese Linguistics 6, pp. 27-75.
Ding Fubao (丁福保). 1932. Shuowen Jiezi Gulin (說文解字詁林 "A Forest of Glosses on the Shuowen Jiezi"). 16 vols. Repr. Taipei: Commercial Press. 1959. 12 vols.
Duàn Yùcái (段玉裁). (1815). "說文解字注" (Shuōwén Jĭezì Zhù, commentary on the Shuōwén Jíezì), compiled 1776-1807. This classic edition of Shuowen is still reproduced in facsimile by various publishers, e.g., in Taipei by Li-ming Wen-hua Co Tiangong Books (1980, 1998), which edition conveniently highlights the main entry seal characters in red ink, and adds the modern kǎi 楷 standard script versions of them at the tops of the columns, with ㄅㄆㄇㄈ bopomofo phoneticization alongside.
Serruys, Paul L-M. (1984) "On the System of the Pu Shou 部首 in the Shuo-wen chieh-tzu 說文解字", Zhōngyāng yánjiùyuàn lìshĭ yǔyán yánjiùsuǒ jíkān (中央研究院歷史語言研究所集刊, Journal of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica), v.55:4, pp.651-754.
Thern, K.L. (1966). Postface of the Shuo wen chieh tzu, The First Comprehensive Chinese Dictionary. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin.
 |
This page contains Chinese text. Without proper rendering support, you may see question marks, boxes, or other symbols instead of Chinese characters. |
