User talk:Shougiku Wine

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your request to be unblocked has been denied for the following reason(s):

Resumed trolling as soon as edit rights came back

Request handled by: Pilotguy (roger that) 22:01, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Do not remove this template from your page.


Contents

Basic Explanations


Unblock me because User:Shougiku Wine is only pointing out the fact. How terrible Korean racism is!
In Wikipedia Korean-racism-sided admins have the right to order the neutral editors not to mention the truth, or not to write the truth disadvantageous to Korean-racism-sided people? Unbelievable! See the pages Japan Probe, Koreans in FIFA World Cup 2002, Wrong Referee Decisions Linked With Korea, Children's drawings in the subway!, How cute. And really recognize how crazy Korean racism is. Almost Japanese have already given up to persuade terrible racism Koreans. In other words Korean racism and vandalism is too insane for almost Japanese to be friends with them. It's a pity that we Japanese cannot join Korean-racism-sided people. But it's natural that such unjustifiable thing can't be accepted. Please think over why the title Dokdo has been putted on the articles of the islands more famous as Takeshima Islands, Liancourt Rocks, or the derivatives. Moreover since 1954 Koreans have been rejecting to be admitted internationally that Dokdo(Takeshima Islands) belong to Korea while having been invading Takeshima Islands and justifying their invasions. But Korean racism is so intensive that they have been insisting that Dokdo(Takeshima Islands) belong to Korea only because they have been invading them. Incredible! I didn't review except Talk(discussion) pages and Wikipedia-namespace pages. It is only that the admins(User:Circeus,etc) have been abusing adminship and only Korean-sided people have reviewed according to Korean racism. If you answer all of the questions below actually, then, everyone know the admins and Korean-sided people having made terrible mistakes.

User:Pgk says,


"Given your continued personal attacks accusing people of racism I am sorely tempted to extend the block"ref.
User:Pgk, where did I made "continued personal attacks" to User:Pgk or your Sockpuppets? It's an evident perjury. Probably this lie comes from Korean racism , vandalism, anachronism, etc.
Besides why can you ask me not to accuse "people of racism", while I have been suffering from the libels that Korean-sided racist people often made with the term "racism", "racist", "discrimination", "disruption", etc.? I am only one of the injured party. Though Chinese( and Koreans) had been the injured party because of Japanese attack and merger before 1945, but, nowadays, Japanese have been the injured party because of Korean and Chinese slander and invasion. In fact the Korean name Dokdo has taken over the Takeshima Islands' articles and I have been blocked by very very unfair reason by Korean-sided people.
Do you see? Admins(at least User:Circeus) and User:Pgk have to perform the accountability to answer all of the questions below concerning "block"ing, "disruption", "racist attacks" "racism", "trolling" and other your behaviors. If you do so, you could explain what you are doing logically. You can find that admins have been abusing and Korean-sided sly persons must be blocked.

Fundamental Explanations to User:Circeus and User:Pgk


I only point out coherently and concretely the disruption by one-sided Koreans and racist attacks by Korean racists(or fascists). I guess that Korean people and the other ignorant people who was deceived by Koreans' ideologies about Japan, South Korea, North Korea, China, Takeshima Islands, Dokdo, Sea of Japan, etc. were pushing and pushing the disruption on Korean side. Because they have been pushing the Korean-sided disruption to excess, there seemed no disruption about the articles above. For example, Koreans and Korean-sided people successed to force the Korean name Dokdo put on the title of the article that explains the islands known as Takeshima Islands(竹島 in Japanese), Liancourt Rocks or something like that. Koreans and Korean-sided people also have been pushing the Korean name East Sea, ignoring the famous name Sea of Japan. I only argue against those Korean racism. It is true that Koreans have stubborn racism. See the pages Japan Probe, Koreans in FIFA World Cup 2002, Wrong Referee Decisions Linked With Korea, Children's drawings in the subway!, How cute. --≡Shougiku Wine 20:59, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

== Please Explain or Unblock. I don't know what you(User:Circeus) mean. ==

This is for the answer of User:Circeus having been blocking me more than 18 hours. The sentences below was sent successfuly at about 19:00, 24 July 2006.

As far as you have been blocking,
 you need to explain and answer all of my questions in my Talk page and so on at once.

Why have you answered all of my questions?

Why have you erased all of my sentences in my Talk page with no proper explanation?

Even if you have been doing what you cannot explain yourself, you don't have the right to falsify other person's sentences with signiture. What you have been doing is obviously criminal.

It seems that you have been doing criminal abusing for your own racism or sadism.

You are never suitable for the admin of Wikiperdia.

If you cannot explain and answer all of my questions in my Talk page,
you should unblock me at once without criminal falsification.

If you can't explain to me why you block me and what you mean concretely and coherently and keep blocking, it is obvious that you are only abusing admin's authority to do vandalism and racism on the Korean side. If you want to say you are not doing so, explain and answer all of my questions in my Talk page and so on, or unblock at once. --≡Shougiku Wine 20:59, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Why have User:Circeus and User:Pgk been killing Wikipedia's official policy?
How to request to be unblocked From Wikipedia:Appealing a block
Users wishing to be unblocked must first contact the blocking admin and allow a reasonable amount of time for a reply. You may contact the blocking admin by leaving a message on your talk page, which you may still edit even though you are blocked.

The sentences above is Wikipedia's official policy.
Why have User:Circeus and User:Pgk been killing Wikipedia's official policy? --≡Shougiku Wine 21:49, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
I think it doesn't mean anything to block anybody unless all of the admins have the responsibility and ability to explain cleary and coherently why the blocking admin has to block the editor and what he call the editor to do. So I have to propose all admins resigning and being elected each month fairly. Present admins will fail for sure if they stay the way they are. --≡Shougiku Wine 21:49, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

your unblock request


Just so you know, nobody will look at it as long as it is still marked as "reviewed" Circeus 22:21, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

  • I have been blocked for the first time. So I don't know how to use this template {{unlock}}. Please teach me how to use {{unlock}} kindly as far as you have been blocking me.
  • [1]I misunderstood User:Pgk pointed out your crazy blocking and your wrong conclusion as "reviewd". User:Pgk didn't wrote who "reviewed" and which sentences are "reviewed". If I reviewed racism sentences as you said, User:Circeus ,User:Pgk, User:Zonath, User:Nihonjoe, User:TheFarix, User:Pilotguy, etc. everyone has already answered all of my questions above very easily. If you wanna think I(User:Shougiku Wine) "reviewd" except Talk pges, show the concrete proofs and actually answer all my questions above at once and cool down your terrible Korean-sided racism. Do it at once. Answer all of my questions above, and you had better to resign adminship and cool down. Why don't you have the least responsibility and ability for your own action? The fact is that User:Pgk wrote "reviewed" on my template without my permission in order to deceive all admins and all general Wikipedians and I was misunderstanding it and I am not sure how to use my template {{unlock}} as ever. --≡Shougiku Wine 13:14, 25 July 2006 (UTC), 14:40, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
  • It is obvious that the people who make Korean-racism-sided-false statements request blocking or really block the Wikipedians who only pointed out how terrible Korean racism is. Korean-racism person expand Korean-racism and vandalism here and there(e.g.Dokdo, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Takeshima Islands). Recognize them. Even my talk page is suffered from Korean-racism-sided admin(Circeus)'s criminal vandalism(See [2], [3]). Are you(Circeus) racism Korean? If you are not, unblock me right now, and don't block me twice, and answer all of my questions above soon. After all, if you didn't, you have been only proving that you(User:Circeus) are extremely irresponsible and unsuitable for a Wikipedia:Administrators--≡Shougiku Wine 13:14, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Again? Sure? Why 1-week block? Why you have thrown away your own accountability? Why you have not tried to understand the matter at all?.

You have resumed your trolling, and for that, you have earned yourself a one-week block. Please use that time to learn the meanings of "consensus" and "Neutral point of view". Circeus 15:20, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

  • Only you have resumed trollings. Where is my "trolling"? If so, you could had pointed it out. But you could not point out anything. It is only that you express my explanations and questions that is disadvantageous for Korean-sided people(Circeus, Sockpuppets, etc.) as "trolling" unfairly. --Shougiku Wine 19:07, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
  • In addition you repeated criminal vandalism to erase many sentences with my signitures with no proper explanations. Obviously you must be blocked. you must be excluded from admins and Wikipedians. For you want to spread Korean-sided vandalism, you have abused me again and again with criminally unfair block. Please learn the meanings of "consensus" and "Neutral point of view" by answering all my questions above. If you are not one of the Korean-racism-sided people, you can learn the meanings of "consensus" and "Neutral point of view" by answering coherently and concretely all my questions and unblock me at once. --Shougiku Wine 17:15, 25 July 2006 (UTC)


If you have been rejecting to answer all my questions coherently and concretely just like Hwa-byung Koreans have been rejecting to leave the ultimate conclusion about the Dokdo(Takeshima Islands) to the international court, I can't put my talk page in order. If you don't wish all my questions read by more people, you should answer as soon as you can and encourage the other accused to answer as sonn as they can. --Shougiku Wine 17:15, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

My Talk page includes the questions to many persons. In spite of it, User:Circeus erased all my questions to the other persons repeatedly. User:Circeus, you proved by yourself that User:Pgk, User:Zonath, User:Nihonjoe, User:TheFarix, User:Pilotguy, etc. are all your Wikipedia:Sockpuppets. Or they are all crazy Korean-racism-sided persons? I don't believe it. If not, why have you messed up Japanese person's Talk pages repeatedly? Explain why you have made a mess of Japanese Talk pages repeatedly?--Shougiku Wine 17:15, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Besides why have you blocked Japanese wikipedians repeatedly? --Shougiku Wine 17:15, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Circeus's abusive ranting?


Keep that up and you'll get this talk page also protected. If you really wish to appeal your block, learn to use {{unblock}} properly. Circeus 17:44, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
As far as you have been blocking me, please tell me how to use {{unblock}} kindly. I don't know now. I have met "block"ing vandalism for the first time. --Shougiku Wine 14:40, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Do you know the meaning of "abusive"? I am very cool. I think you(Circeus) have been very very abusive, so everyone know easily except Korean-racism-sided people that you are not suitable for Wikipedia's admin at all. If not, explain your "abusive" behaviors by answering all my questions. --Shougiku Wine 14:40, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Do you know the meaning of "ranting"? I am calm. Very calm. So, I think, probably you(Circeus) are ranting. --Shougiku Wine 14:40, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Even if you(Ciceus want to abuse, rant, and make criminal vandalism, don't do them in Wikipedia. Here's not Korea. Here's not your own homepage. You see? --Shougiku Wine 14:40, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Answer all my questions. And explain what you mean, or unblock at once. I don't know what you mean because you have never explain concretely and coherently. Therefore Answer all my questions and explain what you mean, or unblock right now. --Shougiku Wine 14:40, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

User:Shougiku Wine's Talk page is not User:Circeus's one. Why Korean racism-sided people act as if even the other person's Talk pages are their own? It's crazy! It's criminal! It is obvious that only User:Circeus and Korean-racism-sided persons have been making heavy criminal vandalism. Because of their heavy vandalism my Talk page become very heavy. And they could have not answered my questions because of their criminal vandalism. But one of them(User:Circeus) has been blocking me to prevail more and more Korean-racism-sided POV and justify their heavy sly vandalism. Therefore I have to maintain the questions to all criminal persons. Just because they have been promoting Korean-racism-sided vandalism POV as if their statements are truths, I have to explain the real truth and ask them many questions. That's all. If you hope Japanese(me) are silent Wikipedians, first of all, you should exclude or change all Korean-racism-sided vandalism articles(e.g.Dokdo, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Takeshima Islands. Second, you should stop all your own Korean-racism-sided cruel vandalism. Can you? --Shougiku Wine 14:40, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

First we Japanese have been attacked unfairly with no coherent explanations by reverting, racial discriminations, racist sentences, poll for deletion, and blocking. Perfoming poll for deletion, blocking the related Japanese persons at the same time is only a nasty plot. This is no more than wicked-rascism vandalism. Why has User:Circeus repeated such nasty plots? --Shougiku Wine 14:40, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Second we Japanese as natural reactions demand Korean-racism-sided people and blocking admin(Circeus) to perform their own accountability by giving an explanation of the cause of their (vandalism) behaviors. That's all. What is "trolling"? It is very clear that Korean-racism-sided people and blocking admin are just "trolling". User:Circeus, please explain about "trolling" concretely and coherently. --Shougiku Wine 14:40, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

We know at least that we don't understand what Circeus means by blocking because he has not ever explain anything concretely and coherently. We realize that he is ignorant about Koreans racism and that he is too stupid not to notice being deceived by Korean-racism-sided people, or you are just one of the Korean-racism-side people. --Shougiku Wine 14:40, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

User:Circeus have commited perjuries repeatedly, because User:Circeus said that User:Circeus blocked User:Shougiku Wine for the reason "Resumed trolling as soon as edit rights came back". Who is trolling? Only Korean-racism-sided people including User:Circeus are trolling. Their sly vandalism and trolling(e.g.Dokdo, Talk:Dokdo, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Takeshima Islands) are so terrible that peaceful Japanese have almost given up. They attack by the plausible terms like "discrimination", "racism", "racist", "vandalism", "disruption", "trolling", "POV", "consensus" and "Neutral point of view", etc, because they are commiting those things by themselves and try to hide their true nature. Why can User:Circeus not answer all my questions? Why has User:Circeus repeated criminal-erasing vandalism? Why do you think you are? If somebody write unfavorable sentences or wrong ones, anyone could point out his unfavorable attitudes concretely or correct his mistakes easily. And everybody can understand those fair process coherently. Why they(User:Circeus and other Korean-racism-sided persons) cannot do what ordinary Wikipedians naturally do. It is very clear that they have been performing their Korean-racism-sided vandalism, excluding the neutral or Japan-sided people.
If you(User:Circeus) want to say "I am not", prove it by answering all my questions concretely and objectively by yourself. --Shougiku Wine 14:40, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Why can you(User:Circeus) not answer all my questions? --Shougiku Wine 14:40, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Why can you(User:Circeus) block me while User:Circeus cannot answer all my questions? --Shougiku Wine 14:40, 26 July 2006 (UTC) Why has User:Circeus repeated criminal-erasing vandalism? --Shougiku Wine 14:40, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Why do you(User:Circeus) think you are?

You(User:Circeus) say, for the reason to block me, Resumed trolling as soon as edit rights came back[4].
But the truth is that you(Circeus) disabled only the neutral Japanese Wikipedians from editting Wikipedia by nasty blocking with the reason of contrary fabrication again. Besides immediately after you(Circeus) unblocked User:Shougiku Wine. Why did you say "as soon as"? You have not answered my questions at all. You have not explained your behaviors at all. You have not talked with me on my Talk Page at all. Why did you block me twice without any proper explanation. It is quite obviously criminal. You(Circeus) have been blocking only to block Japanese-like Wikipedians. Please explain why you said "as soon as edit rights came back" as the reason to block me. --Shougiku Wine 14:40, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Please explain, while you are using "as soon as edit rights came back" for the reason to block me, why have you not used your "edit rights" to perform your own accountability at all "as soon as"(since) you have blocked me? Quite unfair and criminal! You have not explained me your criminal reverting and your cruel blocking concretely and coherently at all. Don't you have the ability to perform your own accountability? Please explain, oddly enough, while you are using "as soon as edit rights came back" for the reason to block me, why have you not used your edit rights to answer my questions concretely and coherently at all "as soon as" you blocked me? --Shougiku Wine 14:40, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Besides why did you say as if you have the right to steal other person's "edit rights". Admins have only prevented other persons from editing Wikipedia. I don't give you my "edit rights". And I can't give you my "edit rights" if I want. Your threatning attitude just like delusions of grandeur looks exactly like the attitudes of Korean-racism-sided people. What useful did you work out to me and oher neutral Japanese Wikipedians that you can take their "edit rights"? See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Takeshima Islands. There is no Japanese Wikipedian! It's Holocaust! Terribly unfair! See Dokdo. It's the worst result of Korean-racism-sided people's vandalism(including all admins). It is very clear that Korean-racism-sided admins (including Circeus) have been treating neutral Japanese Wikipedians by cruel vandalism. What helpful have you done to me and oher neutral Japanese Wikipedians that you can take my and their "edit rights"? --Shougiku Wine 14:40, 26 July 2006 (UTC)


Intoroduction

"User:Shougiku Wine" is homemade prime wine, which is blended with Matsutake extract and Chrysanthemum one. This wine is not merchandized and its trademark "Shougiku Wine" is not registerd now because this wine needs very high cost performances. So I think let the existence be clear in the world. --⇒Shougiku Wine 13:14, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

Welcome!

Image:Sephiroth.gif Hello, Welcome to Wikipedia!
I hope you like working here and want to continue. If you need help on how to name new articles, look at Naming Conventions, and for help on formatting the pages visit the Manual of Style. If you need general help, look at Help and the FAQ, and if you can't find your answer there, check the Village pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or the Reference Desk (for general questions). There's still more help at the Tutorial and the Policy Library. Also, don't forget to visit the Community Portal — and if you have any more questions after that, feel free to post them on my talk page.
Additional tips:
Here are some extra tips to help you get around Wikipedia:
  • If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username.
  • If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills, try the Sandbox.
  • Click on the Edit button on a page, and look at how other editors did what they did.
  • You can sign your name using three tildes, like this: ~~~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too. Always sign comments on Talk pages, never sign Articles.
  • You might want to add yourself to the New User Log.
  • If your first language isn't English, try Wikipedia:Contributing to articles outside your native language.
Happy editing!

--⇒Shougiku Wine 20:04, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

I see you have welcomed yourself. Well, welcome to Wikipedia. ⇒ JarlaxleArtemis 04:00, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

Thank you very much. --⇒Shougiku Wine 20:49, 18 July 2006 (UTC)


Please answer the questions!

(From Talk:Takeshima Islands or Talk:Takeshima Islands)
All of the questions below are ones that User:Circeus and User:Pgk also have to answer respectively if you are not evil Korean racists, because you have been hurting my reputation unfairly, because you wrote below;
--Shougiku Wine 16:54, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Fubdamental Informations of User:Circeus and User:Pgk


All of the questions below are ones that User:Circeus and User:Pgk also have to answer respectively if you are not evil Korean racists, because you have been hurting my reputation unfairly, because you wrote below;

  • "Your user name or IP address has been blocked from editing. You were blocked by Circeus for the following reason (see our blocking policy):

disruption and racist attacks
Your IP address is 222.149.153.81." by User:Circeus ref,

  • Request reason (for Unblock): "None given" by User:Pgk"ref,
  • "Decline reason (for unblock): "Given your continued personal attacks accusing people of racism I am sorely tempted to extend the block." by User:Pgk"ref
  • "reverting personal and racist attacks again. If you keep that up, you'll only get this page protected" by User:Circeusref --Shougiku Wine 16:54, 26 July 2006 (UTC)


Fundamental Explanations to User:Circeus and User:Pgk

Please Explain or Unblock. I don't know what you(User:Circeus) mean.

This is for the answer of User:Circeus having been blocking me more than 18 hours. The sentences below was sent successfuly at about 19:00, 24 July 2006.

As far as you have been blocking, you need to explain and answer all of my questions in my Talk page and so on at once.

Why have you answered all of my questions?

Why have you erased all of my sentences in my Talk page with no proper explanation?

Even if you have been doing what you cannot explain yourself, you don't have the right to falsify other person's sentences with signiture. What you have been doing is obviously criminal.

It seems that you have been doing criminal abusing for your own racism or sadism.

You are never suitable for the admin of Wikiperdia.

If you cannot explain and answer all of my questions in my Talk page, you should unblock me at once without criminal falsification.

If you can't explain to me why you block me and what you mean concretely and coherently and keep blocking, it is obvious that you are only abusing admin's authority to do vandalism and racism on the Korean side. If you wanna say you are not at all, explain and answer all of my questions in my Talk page and so on, or unblock at once. --≡Shougiku Wine 20:59, 24 July 2006 (UTC)


Why have User:Circeus and User:Pgk been killing Wikipedia's official policy?


How to request to be unblocked (From Wikipedia:Appealing a block)

Users wishing to be unblocked must first contact the blocking admin and allow a reasonable amount of time for a reply. You may contact the blocking admin by leaving a message on your talk page, which you may still edit even though you are blocked.

The sentences above is Wikipedia's official policy.

  • Why have User:Circeus and User:Pgk been killing Wikipedia's official policy? --≡Shougiku Wine 21:49, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
  • I think it doesn't mean anything to block anybody unless all of the admins have the responsibility and ability to explain cleary and coherently why the blocking admin has to block the editor and what he call the editor to do. So I have to propose all admins resigning and being elected each month fairly. Present admins will fail for sure if they stay the way they are. --≡Shougiku Wine 21:49, 24 July 2006 (UTC)




Circeus, Pgk, Zonath, Nihonjoe, TheFarix, Pilotguy, Sockpuppets, etc have to answer all the qustions below respectively.

--Shougiku Wine 17:44, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

First Alert

Don' redirect this page "Takeshima Islands" to one-sided-unfair page "Dokdo".
(From Takeshima Islands or Talk:Takeshima Islands)

Second Alert from Takeshima Islands or Talk:Takeshima Islands

See the discussion page of "Takeshima Islands" and "Dokdo" and answer (for User:Zonath).

Third Alert from Takeshima Islands or Talk:Takeshima Islands

Forth Alert from Takeshima Islands or Talk:Takeshima Islands

Fifth Alert from Takeshima Islands or Talk:Takeshima Islands

Sixth Alert from Takeshima Islands

Seventh Alert From Takeshima Islands

Koreans' vandalism: Fair objective Wikipedians are said suddenly, "Please do not remove or change this AfD message until the issue is settled" and so on. --≡Shougiku Wine 21:10 23 July 2006, 20:59, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Why can User:Zonath make all sentences of Takeshima Islands not to be read with no explanations? From Talk:Takeshima Island

  • Why can User:Zonath make all the articles of Takeshima Islands not to be read with no explanations and put redirect to that one-sided Dokdo page in qustion?

--⇒Shougiku Wine 15:29, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

    • User:Zonath, you have not answered yet. Explain it. Why can you make all the articles of Takeshima Islands not to be read with no explanations and put redirect to that one-sided Dokdo page in qustion? --Shougiku Wine 20:59, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

--⇒Shougiku Wine 15:29, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

    • User:Zonath, you have not answered yet. Explain it. Why can't you recognize that the articles of Takeshima Islands are completely different from the too-self-satisfied Koreans' articles of Dokdo?
  • User:Zonath, why can't you see the one-sided-unfair articles of Dokdo having problems all the time?

--⇒Shougiku Wine 15:29, 23 July 2006 (UTC),20:59, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

    • User:Zonath, you have not answered yet. Explain it. Why can't you understand the one-sided-unfair articles of Dokdo having problems all the time?
    • User:Zonath, Can't you see the article "Dokdo" is lean to the Korean-side extremely and protected unfairly? --≡Shougiku Wine 20:59, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
    • User:Zonath, do you know "Dokdo" is only the Korean name? --≡Shougiku Wine 20:59, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Are you a Korean?

--⇒Shougiku Wine 15:29, 23 July 2006 (UTC),20:59, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

    • User:Zonath, you have not answered yet. Explain it. Evidently it is very important question. I am a Japanese. Are you a Korean(including Japanese Korean)? --≡Shougiku Wine 20:59, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Don't redirect this article page to one-sided-unfair page "Dokdo" From Talk:Takeshima Island

Don' redirect "Takeshima Island" to one-sided-unfair page "Dokdo". See the discussion page of "Takeshima Islands" and "Dokdo" and answer (for User:Zonath). --⇒Shougiku Wine 16:02, 23 July 2006 (UTC),20:10, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Why User:zonath repeat vandalism? From Talk:Takeshima Island

Why User:Zonath repeat vandalism? --⇒Shougiku Wine20:10, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

This page originally redireted to the Dokdo article. I am merely restoring the link to its proper location, especially since the Takeshima Islands article has been nominated for deletion. --Zonath 20:14, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
Why can you say "I am merely restoring the link to its proper location"? --≡Shougiku Wine 20:59, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
Why can't you see "Korean-related" articles like "Dokdo" having been always troubled by Korean fascists or Korean racists? --≡Shougiku Wine 20:59, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
It is necessary for Japan and South Korea to leave the ultimate conclusion to the faily international organization(court) if you wish this territorial problems and something like that in Wikipedia would be settled fairly and peacefully. Although Japan has surprised and suffered from South Korea's self-satisfied claim, sudden invasion, rejecting conversations and cruel bashing since 1954, Japan has been proposing the peaceful resolution that international court should investigate and judge fairly. Therefore if you wanna insist "Dokdo" is "Takeshima Islands' proper location, you have to explain concretely and coherently why South Koreans have been rejecting to be admitted the territorial rights of Dokdo(Takeshima Islands) by international organaizations(except Wikipedias of English version and Korean version)? --≡Shougiku Wine 20:59, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
And if you wanna insist that "Dokdo" is "Takeshima Islands' proper location, you must also explain concretely and coherently why South Koreans have never tried to be admitted the territorial rights of Dokdo(Takeshima Islands) by any international organaizations(except Wikipedias of English version and Korean version)? --≡Shougiku Wine 20:59, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
Besides if you wanna insist that "Dokdo" is "Takeshima Islands' proper location, you have to also explain concretely and coherently why Japanese have tried to be admitted the territorial rights of Takeshima Islands by international organaizations(except Wikipedias of English version and Korean version) since 1954? --≡Shougiku Wine 20:59, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
Furthermore if you wanna insist that "Dokdo" is "Takeshima Islands' proper location, you have to also explain concretely and coherently why you act and say as if only the Koreans and admins of English Wikipedia have the rights to resolve or orient territorial problems on this earth and other people have not any rights? --≡Shougiku Wine 20:59, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
You(User:Zonath) said as if you were an outsider, "the Takeshima Islands article has been nominated for deletion". Why can't you recognize that you are proving that you are very nasty and timid Sockpuppet like racist Koreans? --≡Shougiku Wine 20:59, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
You(User:Zonath) said, "the Takeshima Islands article has been nominated for deletion". Why can't you recognize that anybody cannot understand why you have done such vandalism except Korean racists or fascists? Please explain why you have nominate for deletion the Takeshima Islands articles basically differnt from the one-sided Dokdo article? Please explain why you have done such vandalism --≡Shougiku Wine 20:59, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Please explain why you(User:Zonath) have not nominate for deletion the one-sided Dokdo article basically differnt from the fair articles Takeshima Islands? Please explain why you have not done what fair admins would have to do? --≡Shougiku Wine 20:59, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

I think you are very nasty and timid Sockpuppet like racist Koreans. Are you? --≡Shougiku Wine 20:59, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

User:Pgk and User:Circeus, please read and answer all of the question above.

Why 24-hours block? Are you Korean racist?

(I can't help thinking so. --Shougiku Wine 18:46, 26 July 2006 (UTC))

I have blocked you for 24 hours for your racist attacks and disruption. Please take some time to cool down, and maybe have a look at WP:CIVIL and WP:NPA. Circeus 01:36, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

  • I have read WP:CIVIL and WP:NPA. But I don't know why you can say "I have blocked you for 24 hours for your racist attacks and disruption". Are you(User:Circeus) Korean racist? --⇒Shougiku Wine04:20, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
  • I have read WP:CIVIL and WP:NPA. But I don't know why you can say "I have blocked you for 24 hours for your racist attacks and disruption". What do you(User:Circeus) think racists do? Please show your concrete objective criterions here! --⇒Shougiku Wine04:20, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Why has User:Circeus not discussed anything with me and not answered anything at all and kept blocking? Are you evil racist? Are you crazy terrorist? If you wanna insist that you are neither racist nor terrorist, please answer the question to you(User:Circeus). Why has User:Circeus not discussed anything with me and not answered anything at all yet and kept blocking? --[[User:Shougiku Wine|⇒06:04, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Why has'nt User:Circeus answered my questions at all and kept ignoring Korean racists' vandalistic reverts again and again? Are you evil racist? Are you crazy terrorist? If you wanna insist that you are neither racist nor terrorist, please answer the question to you(User:Circeus). Why has'nt User:Circeus answered my questions at all and kept ignoring Korean racists' vandalistic reverts again and again? --[[User:Shougiku Wine|⇒06:04, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

AfD an AfD

Do note that you cannot put an AfD up for AfD. --TheFarix (Talk) 22:37, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

  • Where is the sentence that means "you cannot put an AfD up for AfD"? --⇒Shougiku Wine04:20, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Before your vandalism you should explain in the discussion page why you do so. Why don't you explain your crazy behaviors at all? --⇒Shougiku Wine04:20, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

If you disagree with the AfD, then make your statement in the discussion. --TheFarix (Talk) 22:37, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

  • While one of the Korean-racism-side people is saying "If you disagree with the AfD, then make your statement in the discussion.", at the same time the other of of Korean-racism-side people is blocking me by Korean-sided-racism abusing. As far as being blocked, of course, anybody could not "make his statement in the discussion. Stop this nasty nonsense! --Shougiku Wine 21:18, 26 July 2006 (UTC)


  • Why don't you make any statement objectively against my questions and claims in the discussion page before your crazy AfD? --⇒Shougiku Wine04:20, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Why do you Koreans tend to force people obey to Koreans' ideologies(identities)? --⇒Shougiku Wine04:20, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

However, these AfD discussions are archived as part of Wikipedia's records. --TheFarix (Talk) 22:37, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

  • Do You crazy Korean insist that all discussions must be in Wikipedia namespace from beginning, neglecting the discussion pages in basic namespace? --⇒Shougiku Wine04:20, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Why can't You Crazy Korean understand You Koreans force other people copy and paste all discussions into Wikipedia namespace from the beginning, and neglect the Wikipedians' procedures(See below)? --⇒Shougiku Wine04:20, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
  • I don't know what you say. What do you mean by saying "However, these AfD discussions are archived as part of Wikipedia's records"? --⇒Shougiku Wine04:20, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

User:Circeus! Avoidance! (From Wikipedia:Resolving disputes)

The best way to resolve a dispute is to avoid it in the first place.

Be respectful to others and their points of view. This means primarily: Do not simply revert changes in a dispute. When someone makes an edit you consider biased or inaccurate, improve the edit, rather than reverting it. Provide a good edit summary when making significant changes that other users might object to. The Three Revert Rule forbids the use of reverts in repetitive succession. If you encounter rude or inappropriate behavior, resist the temptation to respond in kind, and do not make personal attacks.

Writing according to the "perfect article guidelines" and following the NPOV policy can help you write "defensively", and limit your own bias in your writing. For some guidelines, see Wikipedia:Wikiquette.

We can't help thinking that User:Circeus proved that User:Circeus is the crazy Korean racist who cannot realize the sentences above at all. --⇒Shougiku Wine04:20, 24 July 2006 (UTC),06:42, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

User:Circeus! First step: talk to the other parties involved! (From Wikipedia:Resolving disputes)

The first resort in resolving almost any conflict is to discuss the issue on a talk page. Either contact the other party on that user's talk page, or use the talk page associated with the article in question. Never carry on a dispute on the article page itself. When discussing an issue, stay cool and don't mount personal attacks. Take the other person's perspective into account and try to reach a compromise. Assume that the other person is acting in good faith unless you have clear evidence to the contrary.

Both at this stage and throughout the dispute resolution process, talking to other parties is not simply a formality to be satisfied before moving on to the next forum. Failure to pursue discussion in good faith shows that you are trying to escalate the dispute instead of resolving it. This will make people less sympathetic to your position and may prevent you from effectively using later stages in dispute resolution. In contrast, sustained discussion and serious negotiation between the parties, even if not immediately successful, shows that you are interested in finding a solution that fits within Wikipedia policies.

Further information: Wikipedia:Negotiation


We can't help thinking that User:Circeus proved that User:Circeus is the crazy Korean racist who cannot realize the sentences above at all. --⇒Shougiku Wine04:20, 24 July 2006 (UTC),06:45, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

User:Circeus! Further dispute resolution! (From Wikipedia:Resolving disputes)

If talking to the other parties involved fails, you should try one of these four methods to resolve the dispute. Which ones you choose and in what order will depend on the nature of the dispute, and the preferences of people involved.

We can't help thinking that User:Circeus proved that User:Circeus is the crazy Korean racist who cannot realize the sentences above at all. --⇒Shougiku Wine04:20, 24 July 2006 (UTC),06:46, 24 July 2006 (UTC)


Do you know the meaning of "Dokdo"?

(From Talk:Dokdo#Do you know the meaning of "Dokdo"?)

  • Do you know the meaning of "Dokdo"?


I think anyone(even Koreans) cannot appreciate the meaning of "Dokdo". I think nobody knows. So "Dokdo" the title of this articles should be changed to "Takeshima Islands" because "Takeshima" is the only formal international name for the islands since 1905. Anyone can understand they are somewhat islands at least. Otherwise it should be replaced to "Liancourt Rocks" because this Wikipedia is English version.

Koreans are too self-satisfied and too nationalistic to admit. Admins should not admit Koreans' violations like this. Japanese have been only challenging to resolve the conflicts with very nationalistic Koreans without using any force. But it's always useless trying to persuade Koreans. If Japanese could use force to resolve territorial problems, Japanese have done long long ago　like WW2. How long Japanese can endure the humiliation by cruel Koreans? If admins of English Wikipedia don't accept Japanese fair claims about "Takeshima Islands", I think all Japanese would have the rights to drop the atomic bombs to USA and Korea at least three times. Do you hope that? I think you've already done.

Besides I don't know the pronouciation of Korean name "Dokdo", "Ulleungdo", and so on. Can you(except Koreans) pronouciate them properly? Furthermore who understand that "Dokdo" is the appropriate name for the islands. "Dokdo"(独島) means "a lonely(独) island(島)" in English. But there are two islands at least. It's too ridiculous! On the other hand, "Takeshima islands(竹島 in Japanese)" means that the islands(島,shima) were used for one of relay stations to carry a lot of thick bampoos(竹,take) that were produced on the Ulleungdo(Ururun Islands in Japanese).

It is very clear which name is the best title to be respected. This is, it's "Takeshima Islands"

First of all, please put {{pov}} at the top of this article(Dokdo). What terrible articles Koreans made one after another! --⇒Shougiku Wine 01:45, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Are you serious with bombing? Don't be silly and read before you write. Otherwise how can you be so ignorant about what's going on on this page? Read before you write. Nobody except some Japanese here will listen to you and this kind of writing will be just ignored. Ginnre 02:19, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
How long Japanese can endure the humiliation by cruel Koreans? How long cosmopolitans have to endure the Koreans' tyrannical attitude? Read my sentences again and again, and accept the meanings of them properly.--⇒Shougiku Wine16:24, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
In fact Koreans have bombed again in spite of international alerts. Why do you ignore the famous Korean fact? How long Japanese can endure the humiliation by cruel Koreans? How long cosmopolitans have to endure the Koreans' tyrannical attitudes? Read my sentences again and again, and accept the meanings of them properly(if you can).--⇒Shougiku Wine17:07, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

User:Good friend100, Korean Fascism? part1

I don't have anything to say. The definition of "Dokdo" and what it means in its chinese form is irrevelent to this discussion. Good friend100 05:17, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
If you say "I don't have anything to say, please don't say anything. This is, don't write anything. All right? And I think nobody can understand your sentences. What is more important, I think nobody can agree with Hwa-byung Korean attitudes that deny all fair discussions and only try to force Korean ideologies without discrimination. So I guess Koreans are the farthest people from Wikipedians. --⇒Shougiku Wine17:16, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
I mean, it seemed that Koreans, Ginnre, User:Good friend100 and so on have proved again and again that Koreans are the farthest people from Wikipedians. If not, "Dokdo" never become to the title and fixed unfairly, pushing "Takeshima Islands" and "Liancourt Rocks" aside. However Koreans insist hard as if "Dokdo(Takeshima Islands, Liancourt Rocks)" belongs to Korea, in fact, Koreans' silly talks have never been approved as the fact more than fifty years. It seemed that it is only the calm before the storm. In fact, the heart of the problem is no more than that Japanese have borne well the humiliation from Koreans more than fifty years. In other words, as far as there are international ways to settle amicably, Japanese have not want to resolve by resorting to force even territorial problems according to the restriction of japanese peaceful constitution. Therefore it is only that Japanese have kept the right to drop the atomic bombs to USA, Korea and so on. Why does South Korea have never sue Japan for the territorial rights of "Takeshima Islands(Dokdo)", though Japan has propose the settlement by international organization to South Korea since 1954? This fact has gone on proving worldwide that "Takeshima Islands" belong to Japan and Koreans are only thieves. --⇒Shougiku Wine19:37, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

User:Zonath, User:TheFarix, Korean Fascism? part2

Please refrain from making racial attacks and racist comments on talk pages -- it is considered vandalism. --Zonath 19:39, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
  • What!? Are you OK? It is clear that Koreans like User:Zonath, User:Good friend100 and so on have been making racial attacks and racist comments against peaceful Japanese and ignorant other people. If not so, "Dokdo" cannot become the title of the article "Takeshima Islands(LIancourt Rocks)". Are you serious? Are you kidding? I think you are serious, so I have to say, please consult a psychiarist at once. --⇒Shougiku Wine00:06, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Why do you think that Koreans who had been Japanese have the rights to get angry with Japanese? --⇒Shougiku Wine00:06, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Why do you think that the Korean name "Dokdo" become the title of the islands that is famous as "Takeshima Islands(竹島)"　for neighbour Japanese and known as "Liancourt Rocks" or someshing like that for other people? Write clear and coherent sentences. --⇒Shougiku Wine00:06, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
  • The population of Japan(more than 1200 million) is more than twice as much as that of south Korea(less than 500 million). Besides, the population of all other people who know it as "Liancourt Rocks" or something like that is more than 6 billion. People cannot say "Takeshima Islands"("Dokdo") belong to South Korea because South Korea has been rejecting international fair objective resolution more than fifty years. Why South Korea has been rejecting international fair objective resolution that [[Japan] has proposed since 1954? --⇒Shougiku Wine00:06, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Why do Koreans use Wikipedia as if it were only Koreans' own? --⇒Shougiku Wine00:06, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
  • User:Zonath and User:Good friend100 are Sockpuppet? If you are not sockpuppet, answer the question respectively. Prove it. --⇒Shougiku Wine00:06, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
I have nothing to prove to you, and no desire to prove anything. If you truly believe that Good Friend and myself are sockpuppets, then by all means, ask an administrator to investigate your suspicions. As for your vandalism of this page through the making of personal attacks, racial attacks, and racist comments, if it continues, you will be referred to the administrators, and you may be blocked from editing as a result. If you cannot maintain a civil tone on these talk pages, then feel free to keep your opinions to yourself. --Zonath 00:23, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
I've already refered him once for attempt to counter-AfD the AfD for Takeshima Islands and have amended the notice for his rather abusive language in his latest post here. --TheFarix (Talk) 00:45, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

User:Good friend100, Korean Fascism? part3

Stop your comments. They are racist and POV. Even if some editors listen to you, you are just humiliating yourself. Please stop the racist comments because you will be liable for being blocked for several days. Please don't put yourself into a position where you can get banned. Good friend100 21:14, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

  • Overbearing! Typical Hwa-byung Korean pattern! --⇒Shougiku Wine00:06, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Do you know the meaning of "discussion"? --⇒Shougiku Wine00:06, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Why can you say "They are racist and POV", shutting your eyes to your own? --⇒Shougiku Wine00:06, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
Do you know here is the discussion page? --⇒Shougiku Wine00:06, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
I think it is clear that Good friend100's comments are racism and out of NPVO. Are you joking? --⇒Shougiku Wine00:06, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
It is clear that Koreans like User:Zonath, User:Good friend100 and so on have been making racial attacks and racist comments against Japanese. --⇒Shougiku Wine00:06, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
  • User:Zonath and User:Good friend100 are Sockpuppet? If you are not sockpuppet, answer the question respectively. Prove it. --⇒Shougiku Wine00:06, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Why do you think that Koreans who had been Japanese have the rights to get angry with Japanese? --⇒Shougiku Wine00:06, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Why do you think that the Korean name "Dokdo" become the title of the islands that is famous as "Takeshima Islands(竹島)"　for neighbour Japanese and known as "Liancourt Rocks" or someshing like that for other people? Write clear and coherent sentences. --⇒Shougiku Wine00:06, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
  • The population of Japan(more than 1200 million) is more than twice as much as that of south Korea(less than 500 million). Besides, the population of all other people who know it as "Liancourt Rocks" or something like that is more than 6 billion. People cannot say "Takeshima Islands"("Dokdo") belong to South Korea because South Korea has been rejecting international fair objective resolution more than fifty years. Why South Korea has been rejecting international fair objective resolution that [[Japan] has proposed since 1954? --⇒Shougiku Wine00:06, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Why do Koreans use Wikipedia as if it were only Koreans' own? --⇒Shougiku Wine00:06, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

If you think you are not racist, think again. Using the term "Koreans" to describe the Korean side or the Dokdo side is racism. Good friend100 01:46, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

  • Using the term "Japanese", "American", "Australian", etc to describe the "Japanese" side, "American" side, "Australian" side, etc or the Pacific Ocean is "racism"? I think all Japanese, all Americans, all Austrailians, etc should deny your Korean "racism". --⇒Shougiku Wine06:04, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

User:Pilotguy is new Korean racist? Sockpuppet of Circeus?

Thisref is the concrete proof of User:Pilotguy's Korean cruel vandalism.

User:Pilotguy, Explain reverts (From Help:Reverting)

Being reverted can feel a bit like a slap in the face — "I worked hard on those edits, and someone just rolled it all back". However, sometimes a revert is the best response to a less-than-great edit, so we can't just stop reverting. What's important is to let people know why you reverted. This helps the reverted person because they can remake their edit, but fixing whatever problem it is that you've identified.

Explaining reverts also helps other people. For example, it lets people know whether they need to even view the reverted version (in the case of e.g. "rv page blanking"). Because of the lack of non-verbal communication online, if you don't explain things clearly people will probably assume all kinds of nasty things, and that's one of the possible causes for edit wars.

If your reasons for reverting are too complex to explain in the edit summary, drop a note on the Talk page. A nice thing to do is to drop the note on the Talk page first, and then revert, rather than the other way round. Sometimes the other person will agree with you and revert for you before you have a chance. Conversely, if someone reverts your change without apparent explanation, you may wish to wait a few minutes to see if they explain their actions on the article's talk page or your user talk page.

We can't help thinking that User:Pilotguy proved that User:Pilotguy is the crazy Korean racist who cannot realize the sentences above at all. --⇒Shougiku Wine06:36, 24 July 2006 (UTC)


User:Pilotguy, Alternative to reverting: move to talk (From Help:Reverting)

If a user makes an addition which you consider POV or generally bad, rather than revert them and hope not to be reverted again, a more productive option is to move their content to the article's talk page where it can be discussed. While the content is still removed from the article, it is a less harsh move because the content is still viewable outside of history, and is more easily referenced in discussion. (From Help:Reverting)

We can't help thinking that User:Pilotguy proved that User:Pilotguy is the crazy Korean racist who cannot realize the sentences above at all. --⇒Shougiku Wine06:36, 24 July 2006 (UTC)


Why can User:Zonath erase all sentences with no concrete explanations?

(From Talk:Takeshima Islands)
Thisref is the concrete proof of User:Zonath's Korean cruel vandalism.
The questions below User:Circeus also have to answer if you are not evil Korean racist.

--≡Shougiku Wine 15:14, 23 July 2006 (UTC), 20:59, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

--≡Shougiku Wine 15:14, 23 July 2006 (UTC), 20:59, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

--≡Shougiku Wine 15:14, 23 July 2006 (UTC), 20:59, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

  • Don't redirect this page to one-sided-unfair page "Dokdo"

Don' redirect this page "Takeshima Island" to one-sided-unfair page "Dokdo". See the discussion page of "Takeshima Islands" and "Dokdo" and answer (for User:Zonath).

If you are blocked, the sentences like below are showed.

What to do next

You can either wait for the block to expire, or contact Circeus to resolve the problem that led to the block.

If you wish to contact Circeus, you may do so via email, or by adding "{{unblock}}" to your user talk page (which you can edit even while blocked, unless it is protected) to request unblocking. --⇒Shougiku Wine06:36, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Protected

Please stop your abusive uncivility, personal and racist attacks here. Oh wait, you can't do them anymore, because the page is protected. You have been blocked twice for racism, uncivility and personal attacks, and your unblocking was denied by three different admins. It's nice to know you believe all these people who were chosen by the community have received this powers unduly. I invite to go tell the thepeple who made us admins that they gave these powers to bully racist sockpuppeters.

That is, once your block expire, and assuming youmanage nottobe reblocked before finishing. Circeus 16:16, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This user is a confirmed sock puppet of Mythologia,
established by CheckUser, and has been blocked indefinitely.
See contribs — page moves — all logs — block log

Please indicate which of your two accounts you'd like to keep (Mythologia or Shougiku Wine) and I'll unblock the one you wish to keep. Thanks! ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 22:05, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../s/h/o/User_talk%7EShougiku_Wine_469e.html"