User talk:Shoester
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia!!!
|
[edit] ???
What does your brother-in-law or any aspect of your personal life have to do with Wikipedia? Why would I or anyone else care? You also make a great many assumptions about me, and slip into the very same snide behaviour you were deriding. Disappointing.
Asgardian 01:35, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
Hercules - simple. The other version has less than perfect text. A common failing among editors. While some of you are great guns at technical editing, you need work on your writing skills (many posters overall knowledge of the stories also seems to need improving). By the by, blindly reverting to a picture of Gladiator with blank word balloons is just silly, as is reverting to a claim that Thor has super speed. Read the discussion. Read the books. Be a tad smarter.
Asgardian 08:18, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Hercules
Hi, with your revert on Hercules page, was there a particular reason you chose a version without references? Cheers Grey Shadow | Talk 15:29, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for the reply. I'll add the references to this version. Cheers! Grey Shadow | Talk 23:58, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
You need to pay a little more attention. You reverted to a version of the Basilisk that had past tenses when I've changed the appropriate sections to present and included a superior image. Starting thinking a little more and be less of an armchair editor who reverts without realising what he is doing. You're also going to be very busy if you plan on just following me around.
Asgardian 03:23, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
You need to pay a little more attention. You reverted to a version of the Basilisk that had past tenses when I've changed the appropriate sections to present and included a superior image. Starting thinking a little more and be less of an armchair editor who reverts without realising what he is doing. You're also going to be very busy if you plan on just following me around.
Asgardian 03:23, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
Like others, you need to think about new edits before reverting. Example: the Wonder Man entry. Some of the references are wrong, and many of the statements lack notation, which I provided. This is helpful for new readers. The paragraphs are also very verbose and hard on the eyes - hence sub-headings arranged in a logical fashion. Also, an image of Wonder Man's first appearance can only be a good thing for new readers. So, it will have to be changed again tomorrow.
The same applies to Galactus. Many posters have passion, but want the entries to be shrines to favourite characters, which can't happen.
Asgardian 01:58, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
I was looking out a window a second story window when I caught my eyeball on the sill the sill someone get a hammer there's a fly on baby's cradle a man's best friend is his mother you're a liar you've been drinking onions make your breath grow stronger peroxide makes your hair go blonder my father bought a horse. Yay, Pop! XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXx