Talk:Shawn Vulliez

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the Web Animation WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Web Animation. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.

Biography Portal

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ]

This page was previously nominated for deletion. Consider the following prior discussions before re-nominating:

Keep, AFD 7 June 2006.
keep, AFD 8 September 2006.

he thinks it stupid and he doesnt deserve it and wishes to someday deserve a page on the glorious wikipedia but he does not think internet flash memes is that big of a deal

I reworded some parts, namely the eBaum's World bits, to be more neutral. How's that? —Adam Atlas 04:16, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

I edited some things to be more up to date, as I am the person this article is about and I know best! -Altffour 05:23, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

You are a liar

Can someone describe more about how this person is actually relevant and worthy of being included in an encyclopedia? Is this vanity? --MMX 09:08, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

I'd say he's just on the cusp of notability, thanks to the ultimate showdown. --Billpg 13:10, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

I agree. This article should not be here at all. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mr.WaeseL (talk • contribs).

Sign your comments with four tildes at the end like this ~~~~, also, notice the article has been nominated for AfD twice and survived, so ignoring that and stating your opinion, specially in that "matter of fact manner", without giving any arguments, isn't going to be constructive. Starghost (talk | contribs) 17:53, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

One could argue that a vote on this relatively obscure article would only attract people involved in it somehow, and thus have 'keep' as the most likely outcome. As for arguments, i was agreeing with MMX who thinks it is vanity.Mr.WaeseL 21:29, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

I added the tag. Shawn is a regular participant in the SomethingAwful forums, and apparently some of his friends in General Bullshit decided to give him an e-penis++. As Mr.WaeseL stated, a vote for deletion would likely attract the interest of the article's originators (and the SomethingAwful forums as a whole) and end up with a stuffed ballot of sorts. --Gigantic Killerdong 18:04, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Article is vanity and should be removed. 71.33.19.24 07:31, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

I really want a nintendo wii this article should be edited to reflect that 205.250.249.145 18:50, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

are you kidding? if the creator of ultimate showdown isnt "notable" enough to have his own article then just about every page relating to internet subculture should be deleted. stop bitching.

Wow, no wonder Lowtax can't stand you GBS creatures. You might want to sign your comments in the future. As for the crux of your argument... "Ultimate Showdown", eh? Maybe it deserves a page of its own, and the content here can be merged into that page. --Gigantic Killerdong 10:00, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

hey I don't care about the article controversy I think it's about time a quote section started and then I could maybe get into wikiquote. please use this as the first of what will be may quotes from me, altf4, on this page 205.250.249.145 07:43, 19 November 2006 (UTC)