Talk:Sharking

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Interpreted Introduction

"It is an act that is commonly videotaped from behind, which has the advantage for both victim and perpetrator of keeping their identities anonymous."

-Er, this is so wrong. It's an attack, and thus should not describe the "advantage" for the victem in it's opening. What's more, these videos are all over the place, and I've not seen any that bother to avoid hiding identities; there is no obvious preference of taping from behind. It's a vicious attack that does not fit a "prank" category in the least! --Mallignamius 00:52, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

-The reason the perpetrator usually comes from behind is to avoid being seen by the victim. It has no advantage other than that of stealth. --jefftheworld 19:15, 1 Novermber 2006 (UTC-5)

[edit] Questionable link

Is the second link really suitable? PureLegend 19:13, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

No - in fact, I don't believe either of them are.

Wikipedia does not need to be an advert for sexual assault. Under the "rape" article, we do not display examples of rape.

This is degrading sexual abuse. We can maintain neutrality without video representation.

Aaron 11.06.06

[edit] Article standards

The article is pretty badly written, especially the subsections towards the bottom being empty. There is little substance here. Jonomacdrones 15:58, 17 November 2006 (UTC)