Talk:Sexton (office)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Text deleted in stubifying is already in the verger article. Andrewa 04:28, 13 May 2004 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] What to do with this article
Is anyone aware of the question mentioned at Talk:Sexton (artillery) about where this page should be?? 66.32.251.152 22:34, 18 May 2004 (UTC)
[edit] Wiktionary message
Check this article. Does it need a Wiktionary message?? 66.245.28.124 23:22, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)
[edit] Holocron?
Just looking at the history page here, not sure what Holocron means by "what's the problem?".
Didn't mean to do anything wrong! Hope everything's OK - sorry for the re-edits - I can't really get a feel for what it'll look like without viewing the live page!
I feel like a dumb @$$! I didn't bother to read the first sentence in the artical. I thought Sexton was some new form of church (like catholic, or protestant, or Lutheran). I just dicovered this myself, when you have changed something in an artical, instead of clicking save page, click "show preveiw". Good work on the artical, BTW.--Holocron 17:07, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the tip - that's good to know!
I don't know what it is, but there is something wrong. When I looked at your edits it says they were done on October 19, 2004. Are you having trouble with a certain vandal? I can take care of him for you if you are.--Holocron 18:26, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
Once again I feel like a dumb @$$. I was looking at the wrong person.--Holocron 18:46, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
No worries, dude! I made quite a few blunders myself yesterday! I think it's the weather! Brianlacey 19:37, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Revisions
Let me start by saying specifically to Neutrality that I'm in no way interested in wheel warring! However, I have a significant problem with his revisions. No harm to non-Christians, but I don't think there's any need to change the description of a sexton as someone who maintains "churches" to "places of worship" as by definition a sexton is an official of ONLY a Christian Church. Supplementary to this, pointing out the jewish counterpart's title is like editing the article of Christian ministers to indicate that their jewish counterpart is called a Rabbi. I just don't think it adds anything useful to the article. But by all means, let's see a separate article written on the jewish version! 82.18.181.186 20:11, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
