From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
Setokaiba is taking a short wikibreak and will be back on Wikipedia soon. |
This is a Wikipedia user page.
This is not an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user this page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Setokaiba.
|
✌
[edit] Personal Statement
To quote Jeremy Clarkson:
"No bargain hunters, bleeding hearts, bullshiters, credit, cheques, computers, collegiates, deadbeats, drunks, daydreamers, non-Chevvy drivers, estimates, Fords, girlfriends, honking, metric, politicians, peddlers, refunds, solicitors, sympathy, vacationers, wives or whiners."
- Real Name: Richard Chapling
- Interests: Yu-Gi-Oh!, video games.
- Campaigns: Wants Dr St John to be Pope
[edit] Edited/Created Articles
[edit] Yu-Gi-Oh!
And finally:
[edit] Pick of the Bad Jokes and Other Deleted Nonsense
[edit] From Template:TooManyBoxes
A common misconception about light bulbs is that they emit light, when, in fact, they absorb darkness. This myth is mostly spread by hardcore Christians, although the Catholic Church, and most Protestant churches have taken no stance on the issue. The Eastern Orthodox Church has sided with the scientists, and its followers tend to support them on the issue. What the supporters of the emission theory use as proof is that light bulbs get hot when they are on. Thomas Edison's associate Charles Dickson explained in an early edition of Popular Mechanics that the heat comes from the friction of the darkness entering the glass. Dickson even referred to an interview with the New York Times where Edison explains the darkness absorption. Unfortunately, the issue with the interview has been lost over time, so there is no proof that Edison approved this theory. However, Scientists almost unanimously agree with the absorption theory, so it is considered scientific fact. This does not make the emission theory wrong, but it falls outside of the realm of science.