User talk:Serenaacw

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome!

Hello, Serenaacw, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!&nbsp


Hi Serenaacw! It's good to see another Christian out there! What's you denomination (if any)?

The userbox code is {{User:P.B. Pilhet/UBX/Pro-Life}}. If you want, you can find the rest of my userboxes here. Thanks!!! -- P.B. Pilhet (Talk to me here) 15:28, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

P.S. -- You can find a whole bunch of different userboxes for almost any topic on this page.


You're welcome, Serenaacw. My grandparents (on my mom's side) are Baptists. Personally, I'm a non-denoninational Protestant. See you around! -- P.B. Pilhet (Talk to me here) 00:22, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Reference Desk

James Blunt! Thats it, i hate it when i forget things i should remember. Thanks for the help. Croat Canuck Go Leafs Go 17:21, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Photograph

I saw your question on the help desk. It doesn't have to be released on the public domain. They only need to release it under a free license like the GFDL or a Creative Commons license that allows derivatives and reuses. It may sound like the same thing, but they're definitely different. - Mgm|(talk) 09:43, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Buddha's relic

Hello Serena. Nice to have your comments on this. I suppose I think that the most important thing is that people should be able to find on the Gautama Buddha page what Buddhists believe about the Buddha's relics, but if there is too much material then a subpage could be created. I couldn't make any sense of the article as it stood and was completely stuck on the wikification. I'm no expert on Buddhism either and perhaps we need to tag it with "expert needed". If no-one else responds to the merger proposal then we could just go ahead and perform the merge. Another thing I probably should do is to leave a message on Wikipedia: WikiProject Countering systemic bias in religion, a project I contribute to sporadically. Although it is not really in danger of bias there are people from a variety of religions who watch that page. Itsmejudith 08:30, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

I looked up naga and found the disambiguation page. It is Mahavamsa that seems to be relevant and I'm wondering whether this whole article is taken out of that text. There's lots to do before this article is comprehensible to people who are not experts on Buddhism. Itsmejudith 09:06, 14 November 2006 (UTC)