Talk:Separatist feminism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is part of
Wikipedia Project Gender Studies
WikiProject Gender Studies

About gender
Gender
Gender studies
Gender and sexuality studies
Femininity
Masculinity

Related concepts and phenomena
Amazon feminism
Anarchist feminism
Feminism
Masculism
Masculine psychology
Men's movement
Misandry
Misogeny
Penis envy
Post-feminism
Pro-feminism
Sex-positive feminism
Radical feminism

People
bell hooks

Relevant lists
List of feminists

Sister projects
Countering Systemic Bias

This WikiProject is aimed at improving the quality of articles dealing with gender studies, and at removing systematic gender bias from Wikipedia.
Click here for details
This article is covered by WikiProject LGBT studies, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to LGBT issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class.

You cant assume that all feminists agree with this seperatist process. I believe in some aspects of feminism but not with seperatist feminism, and whos to say im not a feminist. You? It's not factually true to say they all agree, so it doesn't go in an encyclopedia. Urthogie 02:41, 24 August 2005 (UTC)

The article doesn't even contain the word agree and plainly...
  • Doesn't assert that all feminists agree on separatistism
  • Doesn't say you're not a feminist

Try re-reading the article...? Wyss 17:04, 24 August 2005 (UTC)

  • I must say, however, that the wording of the article was so sloppy that I can see how someone reading through it quickly might be confused. I have fixed the syntax and done a few other things to ensure clarity. Wyss 17:12, 24 August 2005 (UTC)

looks good now, was a problem in communication i guess. Urthogie 20:21, 24 August 2005 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Merging lesbian separatism into this article

As lesbian separatism is a subsect of separatist feminism, it would be wise to combine the two articles into a single, more comprehensive entry. Would anyone object? - Nihila 21:46, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

It seems fair to me, especially if lesbian separatism gets its own section, so it's clear it's a subset, not an equivalent thing. NickelShoe 23:50, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Two comments

  • Lesbian separatism should be more differentiated. I'm not sure I agree with the merger but I guess it's ok if the article evolves to reflect that.


[edit] Holly Near "associated"?

I took this line for Holly Near out of the list of people "associated" with lesbian feminism. I think Holly was shunned by the separatist movement, as noted in her page, but I think the word "associated" makes it sound more like she is a separatist, which is clearly wrong. Another option would be to separate the list into supporters and those affected, but I don't know enough about the others to do that.

[edit] Association between Lesbian Separatism and Queer Nationalism

I qualified the implied relationship between Lesbian Separatism and Queer Nationalism because in my extensive research on Lesbian Separatism I have found many Separatists to be in disagreement with "Queer Theory" and "Queer Culture", many of these lesbians believing that the "Queering" of Lesbian Culture is a plot to co-opt the energy and time of lesbians. Thus I feel the two schools of thought have a tenuous relationship at best/