User talk:SeizureDog

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).
This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 1 day are automatically archived to User_talk:SeizureDog/Werdnabot's archive. Sections without timestamps are not archived.

Contents

[edit] Capitalisation Question

Hello. Just out of curiousity, which standard are you referring to when you decapped ARIA (manga) to Aria (manga)? As you may be aware, the proper writing is it fully capitalised, as can be seen on Kozue Amano's website as well as the Japanese version of this article.

Karn-b 14:37, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Re: List of Shuffle! episodes

Thank you for your input to this article. I am planning to include episode summaries for the first season sometime around December 10th or perhaps a few days later. I was just wondering if you plan to include them before I do because if you're not then I will be more than happy to do so. --(十八|talk) 01:14, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

So you are suggesting that I write up enough for each of the 24 episodes so that there's enough info for an article each? Not to say that I couldn't do that, just it would take a lot of energy and time on my part. I was just planning to put in the short 2 sentence blurbs on the list so that it can become a complete list for the first season, but I am up to do detailed episode summaries, though of course those will take much longer to dish out.--(十八|talk) 06:58, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
How far I'd be willing to go? I'd be willing to go far enough, especially if I had not only the time to kill but also the obsession along with that since I doubt I would write 24 detailed episode summaries back to back for a series if I wasn't at least midly obsessed over it. As I am currently obsessing over Kanon, I can easily see myself doing the same for that one, but then again I don't really have the time or the drive at this point, having seen only 8 of the new series and none of the old one. Also, I have never seen Shuffle! before; the first time I am going to see it will be around December 10th or perhaps a few days later depending on a few other factors. At that point I'll start writing the episode summaries and see how fast I can get done with them. But again I say that I will only go into such depth if I'm obsessing over the series; no guarantee with never having seen it myself.--(十八|talk) 16:30, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Kanon is your favorite ever? My my, omoshiroi since as obsessed as I am about Kanon, I doubt I could call it my all-time favorite. It's still one of my absolutes (the anime I refer to which are absolutely my top favorites; Kanon being one of them). Maybe I'm just too indecisive to chose. XD However, back to Shuffle!, sadly I was not too long ago spoiled about who Rin choses in the end of Shuffle! so that sucks having never seen it, but I still want to see the series though as that was the only thing spoiled for me. Also, now that I know an alternate reltelling is going to air in January, it will give me more reason to watch Shuffle! especially since no one knows currently how Rin will chose the second time around.
There aren't any huge spoilers on the main Kanon page though. Don't go to the List of Kanon episodes article though since it holds a fair amount of spoilers; so much so that I scroll down really fast so as not to see all the summaries of the first series while I constantly update that page. XD--(十八|talk) 16:46, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
While we should switch this over to IM, I'll keep this breif. One: I'm almost always on MSN as I don't like editing Wikipedia on any other browser than MSN, so I'll try you there; I'm almost never on AIM. I have seen Air and am still obsessed over it, just as much with Kanon. Me knowing he chooses Asa in the end now means almost nothing but I suppose it will be a "shock" to me that he didn't chose Kaede or one the others. Oh well, we'll see. --(十八|talk) 17:59, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Just thought I'd like to add that I now see you've taken the plunge to create a Shuffle! network on Wikipedia and I'll help as much as I can in the coming months to help improve all the articles. ^^ First things first, I still have to watch the first anime series though.--(十八|talk) 09:39, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Quick-failure of Storm (comics)

Hi, I just saw you quick-failed Storm for GA. Can I ask you why?

  • Unfree images needing fair use rationales. ==> IMHO none
  • Unsourced [citation needed] tags. (Tip: Check to see if the article is in Category:Articles with unsourced statements) ==> IMHO none
  • The article contains any 'negative' tags, such as (...). ==> IMHO none
  • The article is semi-protected. This indicates that the article is not stable. ==> IMHO none

I just glanced over WP:WIAGA, and I find no glaring errors. So what's wrong? Thanks for reading. Onomatopoeia 08:58, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

OK, I just sat down and made my best to fit in "fair use rationales" and stuff. Would you give it a look? Thanks. —Onomatopoeia 10:27, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for your feedback and constructive criticism. I just saw how long the GAC cue is; is it better to wait until I re-nominate the Storm article, or should I be bold and re-post my GA request now? —Onomatopoeia 11:15, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Template:GAquickfail

I don't necessarily disagree with your usage of the template- in fact, I think it's a good idea. However, you really must remove the clause about an article being semi-protected; as per WP:WIAGA, stability and protection from vandalism are completely unrelated. -- Kicking222 18:46, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Anytime. I'm completely with you on the edit warring issue; however, an edit war wouldn't necessarily constitute a "quick fail," if only because it might take some reading of talkpages and going through histories to spot an edit war. -- Kicking222 23:29, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Samuel L. Jackson

Can you take a look at the images and let me know if they're alright? I added a fair use rationale to the screenshots.--Nehrams2020 00:53, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Does Image:Samburgar.JPG work? I added the last line stating "The screenshot details a notable role of the actor depicted." I don't know what else to add, as when I checked the other Actors/Actresses Good Articles, some are missing or have improper Fair Use rationales.--Nehrams2020 01:19, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Irving Crane—GA quickfail

I have added fair use rationales to the offending image. Since you took the time to look at the article already (thank you), I thought it might be better to simply ask you here informally to take another look, rather than relisting. Thanks.--Fuhghettaboutit 04:41, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

As you've been away and your talk page is about to be archived, I relisted at WP:GAC.--Fuhghettaboutit 23:39, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Nostradamus

You were actually pretty close. As you guessed, X-te miro is a form of X-te miru, which means "try X-ing". Since it's a compound of X-te and the regular verb miru, what you should then have done is look up just miru, which would have told you that miro is the imperative form.

You're also right in thinking that just Nostradamus ni kiite would have had a similar meaning in the right context (a plain -te form isn't always imperative, of course). The difference is that it loses the sense of "try" - it just means "ask Nostradamus".

Keep at it - Japanese is a language well worth learning, and it looks like you've made a very good start!

I've checked and slightly expanded the article as you requested. It was pretty accurate - just a couple of minor slips in the last character bio. The expanded story section should help you make a bit more sense of the game's rather interesting premise. ^^ — Haeleth Talk 20:55, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

I've replied to your reply on my own talk page, to avoid making things cumbersome. :) — Haeleth Talk 21:11, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] $19.99

Creative redirect! :-) I added a link to psychological pricing from pricing after I saw that too! --HappyCamper 22:10, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] List of Fictional Books

Thanks for your comment on the peer review for list of fictional books. However, the usefulness of this list is not presently in question (it's already firmly repulsed an AfD). A surprising number of people are interested in this topic -- literary theorists, literary critics, bibliophiles, writers, readers, or people who just love interesting factoids about books and literature. In fact if you look at the See also section you'll see that someone has written an entire book on fictional books -- it's a not-uncommon literary device that can be used in a variety of fascinating ways. If you have any suggestions to improve the list (even though you personally don't see a use for it!) we would be glad to hear them. Thanks :) --Bookgrrl 17:22, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] SSB AfD.

No longer redundant. See here. - A Link to the Past (talk) 00:37, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

Thank you for telling me about Babel Fish I did not know that there was a translator on the internet. Thanks.Angel,Isaac 01:56, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Negima!: Magister Negi Magi

Your recent edit to Negima!: Magister Negi Magi (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 16:28, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Bookofvile.jpg

oops. Please forgive me --Energman 14:47, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../s/e/i/User_talk%7ESeizureDog_8f31.html"