User talk:Seicer/Archive 2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Contents

Stopping by

Nothing special to say, you just asked me to post if I created an account. I did, so I am.  ;-) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Oherian (talk • contribs) .

Went to the top. I'm tired of being ignored at WP:RPP (see the stupid answer I got for Minnesota State Highway 33) and here, where we've been ignored. And WP:ANI. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 19:38, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

UE Wiki

I suggest you read this link:

http://www.uer.ca/forum_showthread_archive.asp?fid=1&threadid=9293&currpage=1

Mike Dijital was found to have stolen items from a MA asylum and was charged by MA authorities over this. His E-Bay account was closed by E-Bay for this. So, it is not speculation that it happened, it did happen. It is a fact, not a rumor and this community has a right to know it and what Deggi5 really is about. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.188.126.200 (talk • contribs) .

"And my question is, there are vandals on both UER and D5. What makes D5 stand out that much further from the pack, aside from personal opinion? It is obvious you hold a grudge against D5 based on the instance of Mike (@ D5) while holding UER up on a pedistal - although both sites are equal in comparison. As for your edit to the "Shiroi" meet, it has been confirmed that no vandalism occured. See the Discussion page for urban exploration. Seicer (talk) 19:44, 3 August 2006 (UTC)"
As a former member (I don't have that much time anymore to check around on a bunch of UE sites unfortuantely), I never had any problems with Deggi5. They were, in my opinion, much more welcoming and free spirited than UER. But this is not the place to discuss grudges against various sites, its about your baised edits to urban exploration. Seicer (talk) 19:46, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Believe me I don't like having to do that, but I've been on edge about this whole thing since the arbcom. Especially since he started violating the ruling. He had more then enough chances to be good and was given WAY more warnings then any other users would have been. This was a long time coming. I'm going to stay on the lookout for any more violations of it. Because if I can't edit war then he sure as hell isn't going to be getting away with it either. JohnnyBGood t c VIVA! 00:30, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Not a problem. Doesn't look like it amounted to anything but there are those biased admins... --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 20:20, 5 August 2006 (UTC)


Final state highway naming conventions debate

Seicer, your participation is welcome in the Wikipedia:State route naming conventions poll. Please give your input as to the process by 23:59 UTC on August 8.

Regards, Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 21:58, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Copyright violations

If you are going to accuse me, please present the evidence so I have something to refute. Otherwise you are poisoning the well. --SPUI (T - C) 03:03, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Of course, you ignored the citations I provided which justified your lack of respect for copyright laws in the United States. You also have a very hot temper, which irks the ill of many, and as a result, a few have left Wikipedia. Good job. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 03:05, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
Good job in not giving any evidence of copyright violations by me on Wikipedia. Please stop poisoning the well. --SPUI (T - C) 03:16, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Lexington, Kentucky cityscape

Thank you for writing the summation of Lexington's new developments; I think that says what needs to be said without reading like an advertisement. Incidentally, I don't have any data to support this but I doubt that Main & Rose will really be Lexington's first downtown grocery (I changed it from "urban" to be more clear); having grown up downtown I know there haven't been any for decades, but I am very skeptical of the claim that there has NEVER been a grocery store in Lexinton's downtown. Cmadler 15:50, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

You are correct on that, I should have reread what I wrote. I was trying to make the point, from what I read in the H-L, that it would be an urban grocery store. None currently exist in the CBD. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 15:52, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

List of numbered highways in Ohio

You moved this to List of Ohio State Highways by copying and pasting the content. This splits the article history and removes attribution. Please use the move tag to move a page. --SPUI (T - C) 04:55, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Your "blanking" of other material (essentially, since you shunned the pages to the main List of numbered highways in Ohio) is inapproperiate. The seperation of the pages, similar to West Virginia, is far more approperiate and wise since the list of highways is very long in Ohio. Most people do not care to scroll through a very un-user friendly list. See Talk:List of numbered highways in Ohio for my full reason list. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 05:52, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

"Vandalism"

If you continue to label good-faith edits as vandalism, you will be blocked. --SPUI (T - C) 06:25, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

"Good faith" my ass. Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Arbitration enforcement#Multiple_reverts_User:SPUI. Numerous instances have been recorded to which you have been blocked and warned many times before for. Shall I remind you of Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Arbitration enforcement#User:SPUI and many other instances of infractions in the past? Seicer (talk) (contribs) 06:27, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
May I inform you of [1]? My status as a pariah is not an entitlement for you to play dirty. --SPUI (T - C) 06:29, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
I see you are reverting to threats, similar to what other users have had to put up with you. I shouldn't be suprised by this, but I'll continue reporting to the Arbitration Enforcement whenever issues rise. And I am pretty certain that I am not alone in this. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 06:31, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
"I'll continue reporting to the Arbitration Enforcement whenever issues rise." If my statement is a threat, that certainly is. --SPUI (T - C) 06:36, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

VT table

I'm looking at it now -- is there nay correlation on those rows (e.g. is VT 2A related to 8A in any way)? The shading seems to imply such a relation exists (I'm guessing there isn't and it's just a numerically ascending table of the VT routes). If there isn't such a relation, maybe you can experiment with a checkerboard-type shading scheme? The only probelm with this that i've run into is when it needs to be changed it gets to be quite a pain to fix the shading, espeically if you're adding something in here or there. If you want, I can whip up a PHP app really quickly that throws out the correct shading for the routes currently on the table. The only risk we'd be taking with a checkerboard shading is that it might seem to be a little too 'busy' on the page with so many colours and images around.

Another usability issue is not your fault but more wikipedia's -- i'd be inclined to click on the image to go to the article with the current scheme -- but the mediawiki automatically links us to the image itself, which is arguably useless. Maybe if you try the following format it would look better (excuse the HTML needed to make it look like a table, I know it's not wikipedia-standards compliant):


Route 2A
Route 2B
Route 3

Route 4A
Route 5A
Route 7A

Route 7B
Route 8
Route 8A

Also, I seem to be favouring the term 'Route 2A' over 'VT 2A', it would make the area to click on (the text itself) more prominent compared to the 'VT 2A', and the vermont is more or less implied by the title of the page. atanamir 07:26, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

  • looking it over again, maybe you can afford making the images a little bigger (I experimnted using the bottom row) since the clickable text seems to be prominent enough now. Plus, the numbers on the images were getting a little distorted. atanamir 07:27, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
    • Another thing you can do which should most likely make it much much harder on the editor is to make the entire cell clickable to the article -- you can look atthe HTML required in the source. I've done so on the last bottom right cell of that table (Route 8A) to show you. This would absolve many of the clickability problems. The image, still, when clicks, will go to the Image page. I dont think that can be overriden without advanced Jscript. atanamir 07:30, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
      • Never mind, mediawiki takes out the onclick. ignore that last point ^^. The 100% can get a little too big too -- that was my first thought. I have a 24" monitor and it streches all the way across the screen and can get a little busy/cumbersome to look at. What I did above was to soften the background colour a bit as well. atanamir 07:32, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
        • I would say the grey / white ratio is exactly what causes the business phenomenon to occur. I've created several examples of gradually lightening shades of grey at User:Atanamir/VT. You can take a look tomorrow. Good night! atanamir 07:42, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

OH Route List

Should we update that move proposal at OH for List of highways in Ohio and start a new vote? I think the sheer number of possibilities I've proposed there are throwing people off and there's starting to be votes for too many different names. atanamir 17:46, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

  • Personally, I prefer the current name as its most specific (I tend to agree with SPUI most of the time when it comes to these things), but seeing as most people would liek it moved, my second choice would be List of highways in Ohio -- if you look at the article state highway, it makes it clear that the term state highway only refers to state route / state highways -- roads that are completely state-administered. Interstates and U.S. Routes are both partially funded by the federal government, and thus don't fall under the 'state highway' category, although they are maintained by the state. I think we should change it to List of highways in Ohio, if that's fine with you. atanamir 17:53, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
    • Do I need to create a whole new proposal? or just edit the one and archive the previous votes? atanamir 19:01, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Ohio State Highways WikiProject

Hi – thanks for chiming in on my contribution on the talk page. I'll reply there regarding the Infobox, but I wanted to personally ask you if you had any thoughts on the rest of my suggestions there? I have created all new shields (as all of the 3-digit shields were an incorrect size), and they're sitting on my computer right now. I'm hoping some others will give some feedback on the suggestions I've made. I'm also trying to work on a junctions table as I mentioned there. Thanks! Homefryes 15:20, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

List of Washington State Routes

Sorry, it took so long, but I have created a poll regarding the organization issue at WT:WASH. -- NORTH talk 21:23, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Huntington WV Cityscape

No problem, Seicer. Always glad to help! The Punk 05:50, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

SR List for Ohio

List of State Highways in Ohio -- couple of questions:

  1. Do you mind if I move this to lowercase? they shouldn't be capitalised because it's not a proper noun.
  2. Is it OK to take off the "Ohio" prepending all of the State Routes? This is for several reasons:
    1. (main reason) The article won't fit unless I maximize the browser window in 1280 resolution, simply having State Route X should fix this.
    2. (other reason) Ohio's DOT calls them State Routes too.
    3. (minor reason) all the "Ohio"s seem superfluous

If you don't want me to, that's OK too. atanamir 22:46, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

  • BTW, good job with the list -- the main page looks a lot cleaner now :) 22:47, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Ohio Navibox

I've added a navibox to all the Ohio route pages, what do you think?

List of State Routes in Ohio atanamir 06:18, 24 August 2006 (UTC) PS - sorry about that really dirty move from state highways in ohio to state routes in ohio, i wanted to see the results an was too lazy to go through requested moves pages. atanamir 06:18, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

  • If you like the way it looks, I'll go through the requested moves so we can get the talk page and history and all so it'll be better. For now it's just an experiment on how it can be used. atanamir 06:21, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Removing of discussions from RSS Talk Page

Please check the following removal from RSS talk Page by HKelkar who I have reasons to believe is the meatpuppet of Subhash Bose.I am looking for a particular comment on the same lines made by both these two logins.TerryJ-Ho

Even I make comments and edit summaries very similar to user:Subhash bose. Does that make me a sock (no I have over 15x as many edits as TerryJ-Ho)? I think TerryJ-Ho is merely biting a newbie.Bakaman Bakatalk 18:45, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

I would contact an admin or go [Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Arbitration enforcement here] to take action. It does seem as if he is a sock puppet.
And who are you all? :P Seicer (talk) (contribs) 21:06, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Regarding 70.35.237.67

I would like to differ you to WP:AN/I rather than AIV. The user has a mix of constuctive edits and now there is the issue over Lexington. Please post your complaint there, and outline the history of the dispute. Otherwise, the IP is not worthy of blocking. Teke(talk) 04:49, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Absolutely not a problem. Those were the edits that lead me to pointing you to ANI. It's obvious there is a dispute, and it will be resolved. Teke(talk) 05:03, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
Will this be dealt with soon? This user just isn't stopping. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 05:57, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
I blocked the IP 703523767 user for 24 hours. I'm going to leave him a message explaining how to better resolve disputes. When the block is over I need for you all to stay calm and be a good example. The typed of edits the user was making were not highly damaging to the articles so you need to try and discuss on the talk page instead of doing multiple revert edits. If the user will not engage in discussion that leads toward consensus and starts back disruptive editing leave me a message and report on WP:AN/I.
The Ashland school offers AA or AS not BA or BS. FloNight 01:23, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
In regards to what is considered a constructive edit, many edits by 70.35.237.67 appear constructive at first glance due to the fact that they cite sources, but when the sources are examined they do not directly reference what they are being sourced to. This user cites inaccurate sources in an apparent attempt to create legitimacy to his/her form of vandalism. Chris24 02:18, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
Remember that we always need to assume good faith and not WP:BITE. I blocked the IP to stop them from editing and get their attention because they were not following policy and not listening to your warning. I'm not sure that the IP is a vandal. Good chance the IP does not understand the rules and is too stubborn to admit it. I'm going to encourage them to get an account and follow the rules. If that does not work then we can block for longer, okay. FloNight 02:40, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Apologies for mess in Dairy farming article

Apologies for the multiple comments inserted as italics. I have gone back and converted these to [citation needed] s with comments as suggested. Speaking as someone with a dairy farming background (120 head in a relatively modern setup for the mid-1970s) the article seems to have been written by contributors with a good knowledge of the business, but considerable work is needed to add citations for the facts they may have taken as basic knowledge, and to balance some of the bits on competition which appear to be geared to particular national perspectives. Anyway, thanks for your pointers on the proper way of doing this. Hopefully it looks a bit better now. ClearwaterAg 02:32, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

I appreciate it... I needed that. Although I thought I got blocked at first :) --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 19:18, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

And so CBD is complaining now? I left him a note at his talk page. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 17:50, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

I sent you an email. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 05:34, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Comair 5191

It's clear to me that at least two of the editors participating in the discussion have no interest in reaching consensus but instead would prefer to bandy about insults and avoid direct questions asked of them, so I'm putting this on your Talk page instead, where you, who seem like an eminently reasonable editor, and I can further discuss things. :)

Have you thought through any proposed revisions to the article yourself? I've been sort of playing around with it in my head, and I think an "Aftermath" section might be an appropriate addition. That would allow for a brief discussion of the violation of FAA staffing policy and the FAA's reaction to it, if nothing else. Unfortunately, it would also open up the article for all sorts of other, even less relevant garbage, like a mention of the lawyer scum in Texas "recruiting" clients, which is unquestionably "aftermath" of the crash as well. I really don't want to have to fight this battle about those sorts of things too.

I am adamantly against including any mention of the pilots getting into the wrong aircraft, as this only serves to indict the pilots as completely incompetent absent an explanation (which has thus far not been forthcoming from either Comair or the NTSB) of why this happened.--chris.lawson 21:04, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

I just wanted to say that there has been a RfC. regarding Comair Flight 5191 Since you have been a contributor to the article, I encourage you to add to the debate and to contribute to the article, in the future. Mytwocents 05:34, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for your kind words over on my talk page! I agree, something had to be done, and from the way it appears, a compromise seems to be in place. But we'll see if it holds. In any case, two days away was plenty enough for me and I'm ready to go. Thanks again! --TMF T - C 16:15, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

WP:SRNC

I am disturbed by your bad faith assumption on User Talk:Lar's talk page, implying that I am a stooge recruited by SPUI to make his argument; I have disagreed with him vehemently more often than not on road issues and only find myself in agreement here by coincidence, not pre-agreement. The Proposal 3 that I offered seems to be a reasonable solution to the issue, and your support for it as an option will go a long way to addressing these differences of opinion. Alansohn 19:23, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Are you User:Rschen7754's stooge or do you have your own independent thoughts? I will assume that your views were independently arrived at unless otherwise proven. If it's not referring to me, then who is included in your claim that SPUI has been "dragging in others that he has requested from the NJ roads project", which seems to be calling me (and any other person who has participated in both WP:NJSCR and WP:SRNC) a stooge of SPUI's because they happen to agree with him. If you can't provide any evidence that this is the case, your assumption is a blatant failure to assume good faith. Other than foolish consistency, I fail to see what is lost by acceptance of Principle III in addition to the two alternatives previously proferred, which would achieve real consensus. Who would be excluded from agreement or otherwise harmed if Principle III is accepted as a compromise? Alansohn 19:48, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

wrong ip mask

If you check history carefully of Mila Jovovich article, you will see that it is not 213.240.3.17 who is a dynamic ip 3rr, it is 213.240.3.* that is. Lowg 04:36, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Milla Jovovich article

Hi. Vandalism on Milla Jovovich article continues. I have reason to believe the same editor who used dinamic IP did it again, and opened a new account. The same user just accussed me of the same, although it is obvious from history of that article this is not the case. He also revelaed the name of my IP. It is possible the user fails to understand the meaning of his violation, or Wikipedia rules in general. The user changed the article erasing references that made that data verifiable and replaced it by unsupported claims that conflict the rest of the article anyway. I will not edit just yet, as I don't intend to breach the 3RR, but what can be done against this vandalism and what can be done to stop a destructive edit war? I've tried my best and gave good, official, undisputable references that support my version, but they are persistantly being replaced. I proposed in the Talk page for that article to be protected from further editing for a limited amount of time, so we can let those hot heads cool off. After, of course, it has been reverted to the well-sourced version, as you did previously. Can this be done? Can I take this proposal to someone, as this edit-war is really frustrating, although I'm not about to let the thing go just because vandals are persistant. Please let me know what you think. Regards--213.240.3.118 22:48, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Sorry to step on your edit

I had just gotten my watchlist a moment before, and hovering over the diff didn't show that you'd made an edit in the intervening seconds. My apologies. ClairSamoht - Help make Wikipedia the most authoritative source of information in the world 03:01, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Linking to Virginia state highways

As mentioned in WP:USSH, please link to State Route 55 (Virginia) rather than Virginia State Route 55 where the context is clear (which includes the two links in this edit). Thank you. --NE2 23:27, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

US 48

I'd say include both - people that are exclusively browsing WV roads would only see the WV-specific page, so it'd probably be best to include the templates on both the main page and the WV subpage. --TMF T - C 04:34, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Minor suggestion

Consider renaming your excellent photos to a more-descriptive name. That way other user can easily use them in other articles as needed. Cheers. youngamerican (ahoy-hoy) 18:59, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

The Tristate project sounds pretty cool. I'm game. youngamerican (ahoy-hoy) 19:23, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
One more thing, I have a photo of the Art Museum that I took on one of my drive abouts, but coulnd't wedge it into the main article on H-ton...I'll try to post it today or tomorrow. youngamerican (ahoy-hoy) 19:26, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Renaming images once uploaded...

...is a giant pain in the arse. Don't worry about it. I was refering to future images that you may upload. Just change the name on your computer before uploading them.

Also, thanks for starting the new project. My next edit will be to join. Cheers. youngamerican (ahoy-hoy) 15:54, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Minor question

If I may ask, exactly how do you change the font and/or color of your signature under 'my preferences'? Chris24 02:08, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

KYOVA

Thanks for inviting me, Seicer! The Punk 03:09, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

No problem :) Just trying to help out Seicer (talk) (contribs) 04:08, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

WV Shields

Hey. Here's the blank WV shield: . To make the shields, I use Inkscape, a freeware SVG editor. Even though it's free, its quality is top notch. Regards, TMF T - C 02:25, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

US 52

Sorry about that. My maps didn't show 52 entering Kentucky. Thanks for fleshing out that section. ObtuseAngle 03:54, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

SPUI

He blanked his talk too. ... take it to WP:ANI to see what to do? Or just leave it? --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 02:58, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Take it to ANI. I'll be gone for a few days, but I will easily say that you will have a lot of support. I'm reverting the talk page. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 03:29, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
omg, you guys, lololol Stratosphere (U T) 03:31, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
I put it up there. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 03:39, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks. Looks like SPUI's biggest fan, Freakofnature, posted. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 04:00, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
Consensus is to leave it blank, so that's probably the best option. There's always the history, and if he returns, we can probably unblank. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs)

NC 143

I don't know much about North Carolina, since I've been concentrating an Virginia. I do however see two things: the article should be at North Carolina Highway 143 (per WP:USSH), and the secondary (four-digit) highways repeat in different counties. I also believe NC 1127 is actually called Secondary Road 1127. --NE2 05:03, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Kentucky links

In accordance with WP:USSH, the articles should all be at Kentucky Route. I will move them once the link fixing is complete. --NE2 00:05, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Former WV 59

Are you familiar with the former WV 59 (now CR 59) from Lost City east to Virginia? I'm going to write an article about the former VA 59, which connected to it, and would appreciate any insight into the road. VA 59 was part of the original 1918 state highway system, with no other state line crossings between US 250 and US 50, but was transferred to the secondary system in 1949 as a very minor local route. --NE2 00:05, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

No cites from bible??

What are you talking about? The cites were right at the end of the section. Here [2] and here [3]. Cheers. L0b0t 15:27, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

No problem. SlimVirgin explained it on the talk page. Cheers. L0b0t 15:47, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Situation resolved due to misintepertation on my part. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 01:53, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

'Seconded'? on PETA talk page

What do you mean by 'Seconded'? Do you mean that you second the response by Alien3 or do you second the creation of a criticism section?-Localzuk(talk) 15:21, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Situation resolved due to misintepertation of my comment. Amended said comment. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 01:53, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

WV projects

They all seem to be major projects - no minor secondary routes - so I'd put them in the individual articles. For the various connectors that are planned, especially where there is little information, it might be best to create a proposed highways in West Virginia article until construction begins. Just my two cents. --NE2 19:57, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

That Excel file includes "I-66 TUG RIVER TO KING COAL HIGHWAY". It may not be built to Interstate standards, but it's as much of an "Interstate" as I-73 and I-74 in West Virginia. I definitely see your side though - do you think it should be removed from the list? --NE2 01:06, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Interestingly, I was just thinking about that; I added something about that duplication to Corridor G (Appalachian Development Highway System), but of course in a NPOV manner. If I were doing the planning, I would have taken US 119 south from Huddy to I-66 and then west on I-66 to Pikeville.
Also: K-80: I-66?
-Tom From Ohio... er, --NE2 01:22, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

6000s Routes

I don't think routes listed in the 6000s should be listed on the Roads in Louisville Page b/c they are only for state maintenace at interstate ramps & not through routes themselves. -67.150.63.219 17:28, 26 October 2006 (UTC)!

I'll agree with that. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 18:46, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

WOuld you want some pictures of the I-77 tunnel at the WV/VA line? I have some vacation photos of them 67.150.95.27 21:19, 26 October 2006 (UTC)!

You should sign up for an account and use the Special:Upload link to the left. Vacation photos aren't warranted here, but if you have a clearer one of the entrance or one that is relevant to the article, feel free to add it. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 23:44, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
Situation resolved. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 06:10, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Template:West Virginia highways

Obviously you are unfamilar with WV roads, and don't let the facts get in the way of your edits. City Streets are not part of the WV highway system. Your shielding is wrong of secondary roads, that matches C.R.'s. You left out C.R.'s which stands for County Route, although they are part of the state system. You also left out the Orphan Road program signage as well. --71Demon 14:04, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

"Roads of Charleston, West Virginia" do not necessairly be part of the WV Highway system. They are meant to explain in detail, the roads of a particular city. See Cincinnati, Toledo, Lexington, Ashland, and Louisville. You completely misinteperted the meaning of my post, so you should reread them and then reread the pages I have cited. Secondary roads utilise circular shields, but I have not made any of them, so do not place the blame on me - and the fact that I haven't updated *anything* about County Routes, you have demostrated that you cannot approperiate the edits to the right editor. Please correct your attributions and try again. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 20:25, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
Situation resolved. 71Demon wrongly attributes a correct shield designed to WVDOH specs to numerous users and expects a serious response. This user also cannot discriminate against "City specific" and "City streets" - which was clearly explained on numerous occassions. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 06:10, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

A question

Hey Seicer. An issue came up earlier today in which 71Demon believes that my WV shields are unprototypical, despite the fact that I created them based on specs publicly available on the WVDOH site. The argument can be found here and here. Since I trust in your knowledge of WV highways, I'd like your take on my signs. Thanks in advance, TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 23:13, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

I agree. The signage is designed to WVDOT specifications and I see no problem with it. Remember that this is the same user who cannot differentiate between "City specific" and "City streets" - not that the latter violates any rulesets. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 00:53, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
Situation resolved. 71Demon, as stated above, spammed many user talk pages with irrelevant comments. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 20:09, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Redirects/merge proposal - WP:AGF and WP:NOT

Sorry, Seicer - it's done in an attempt to merge the information to the more appropriate article, Charleston, West Virginia. Unless you have a great explanation as to why a city with only 50,000 people should have a "List of Roads in..." article (without a discussion as to inclusion/exclusion criteria) when major cities don't have them (never mind the argument I present on the Charleston talk page), this is the best way to avoid AfD. Please assume good faith and realize that Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. We all want to improve Wikipedia, and I know that you are editing in good faith as well. 4.234.165.179 01:13, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Situation resolved. IPuser is a rogue tag-happy user who does not contribute outside of creating controversy. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 01:47, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Image names

I noticed that you've been naming your images with camera-generated names. It would be helpful if from now on you titled them instead. Thanks! --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 01:52, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Interstate 265

Please follow WP:USSH for the titles of Indiana's state roads. Thank you. --NE2 03:25, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Situation resolved. I was unaware of the difference in titles for the pages and "common useage" since I am not typically an Indiana contributor. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 20:08, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

AFD

I closed it out, but next time I'd wait until it's closed normally to ensure that people don't think of bias. I don;t think they will here but just to make sure. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 03:44, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Re: US Naming Convention Proposal

I responded to your comment regarding the proposed naming convention change. I believe you misinterpreted Serge's proposal. -- tariqabjotu 04:37, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Image:1228039.jpg

I'm pretty sure that is you, but you might want to trim off that copyright tag you put on the bottom of the image and explian that you are opening it up to a free license.

Also, I'm not too familiar with the Corridor G past those shops just south of Chas. Sorry. But I will check out my maps when I get a chance. Cheers. youngamerican (ahoy hoy) 16:50, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

It shouldn't be too bad, just crop the bottom and re-upload. But yea, it is a big red flag. I know you and that you release it, but there are others that don't and will delelte on site of that copyright notice. youngamerican (ahoy hoy) 16:58, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks. youngamerican (ahoy hoy) 19:36, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Situation resolved. All images affected were reuploaded sans stamp. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 20:08, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Re: Charleston, West Virgina

While I wholeheartedly agree that the two articles should not be merged, I humbly suggest that you cool your jets and assume good faith a little bit longer with this IP. I've looked through the IP's contributions and don't see anything too alarming. There's nothing wrong with being a little tag happy; tags promote discussion and do far more good than harm. It only becomes a problem when people act on those tags even when consensus speaks otherwise. As of now, that hasn't happened. -- NORTH talk 17:28, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Like I said, I do agree that they shouldn't be merged, and I'll say something to that effect on the article talk page when I get the chance tomorrow. -- NORTH talk 08:20, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

H-M Trail

  1. Thanks for the notice of the WV work.
  2. Did you try this: [4] ?
  3. I think I will go ahead and join your project.
  4. Do you have any photos of Beech Fork SP? If so, can you post one to the article?

Thanks, WVhybrid 02:10, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

It looks like we may have some photos of Beech Fork SP coming soon. You might want to hold off until you see if you like the pix that get posted soon. WVhybrid 23:13, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

West Virginia Route 2

Why did you remove the county categories from West Virginia Route 2? WV 2 relates to the counties, just as their communities, lakes, parks, and other features do. --NE2 20:57, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

However, if the counties are removed, you can't get to the route from the county's category. Your argument would lead to completely emptying the categories because you can always get to them from the articles. --NE2 21:02, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
I don't think that's possible, but I don't see why it matters. The categories are at the bottom of the page, possibly for this reason. --NE2 21:06, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../s/e/i/User_talk%7ESeicer_Archive_2_cb03.html"