Talk:Sedevacantist antipope

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

[edit] Old discussion

For a lot of old discussion on the subject, the pre-split talk page of Antipope, see Talk:Antipope. --Pjacobi 18:17, 17 May 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Sedevacationism and the papal veto

The veto was used on a number of cases - the last involved being Mariano Cardinal Rampolla and Pius X - have any sedevacationist claims arisen thereby? Jackiespeel 18:24, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Superfluity and non-encyclopedic nature

Sedevacantist antipope is a contradiction and does not exist. To be a sedevacantist one must deny that there is a pope. The article, to be encyclopedic, should be renamed conclavist popes and include a link to Benedict XVI (!). There can be a re-direct from conclavist antipopes and an explanation of why such a phrase is as nonsensical as atheist theist. pauldanon

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../s/e/d/Talk%7ESedevacantist_antipope_fa24.html"