User talk:Schnits

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello Schnits, welcome to Wikipedia.

You might find these links helpful: How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Naming conventions, Manual of Style. You should read our policies at some point too.

If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the Wikipedia:Help desk or (if you want a broader audience) the village pump, or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

• You can introduce yourself on the new users page.
• You can find lots more information, including open tasks and daily tips, at the community portal.
• You can sign your name using four tildes, like this: ~~~~.
• Before saving a page, it's a good idea to use the Show preview button to review your edits. Also, consider writing a summary for each edit.
• The Tutorial is a great way to learn the basics in a more perspicuous fashion.

Again, welcome! Chris Roy 01:09, 3 May 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Penhold

Hi Nathan, do you release your Image:Sunset over Penhold.jpg into the public domain, license it thru Creative Commons, or is it just used with permission? Please respond at user_talk:zanimum. -- user:zanimum

I've marked it on its page, so that everybody knows. There's a movement going on to make sure every image lists its source. -- user:zanimum

[edit] Democratic Socialism vs. Social Democracy

Social Democrats try to create a slightly more egalitarian society within the confines of Capitalism. Democratic Socialism tries to work within the confines of Capitalism, to eventually surpass it and create Socialism. Within these trends, there are of course rightist and leftis parties that are very different from the ideas of the whole. Hence, there is overlap, but they are still distinct traditions.--Che y Marijuana 04:52, Mar 31, 2005 (UTC)

Indeed, while many of the current Social-Democratic parties arose out of Democratic Socialist parties, they are indeed different. Democratic Socialism is primarily associated with the Marxist (used loosely) parties of the Second International and their ideological heirs, whereas Social-Democrats tend not to buy into that communism jibber-jabber. Dig? --VMC

[edit] Images

Any images that you have taken yourself and uploaded are GFDL licensed per the terms on the upload page. I have updated the tags accordingly. If you do not wish to have your images GFDL licensed, you may ask for them to be deleted, though there is no guarantee that this will be done.

The Uninvited Co., Inc. 20:37, 12 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image:WAkaw April 9, 2004. Gpa birthday 022.jpg listed for deletion

Admrb♉ltz (T | C) 23:19, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] They're back

Please revert Saskatchewan Party if you have a chance. CJCurrie 23:50, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

Please be very cautious with any reverts of Saskatchewan Party or similar articles, and please refer to Wikipedia:Conflict of interest since you have admitted on your Talk:Schnits page that you have 'canvassed and worked' for the Saskatchewan New Democratic Party in the past. CJCurrie's request of you is completely innappropriate.

64.110.251.69 05:05, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Due to any bias on my part that is why *I* cite anything I edit. Let me also indicate any NDP work I have done, was done for the Federal party, which is of a clearly different ideological stroke than it's provincial counterparts. -Schnits.

Your on the provincial youth wing of the NDP. Would that not count as work for the provincial NDP? Mknight1971 11:46, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Talk:Saskatchewan Party

Please remember to sign your posts on talk pages. Typing four tildes after your comment ( ~~~~ ) will insert a signature showing your username and a date/time stamp, which makes it clear who said what, and when. Thank you. Ardenn 05:18, 26 June 2006 (UTC)