User talk:SchmuckyTheCat
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome to my talk page. I recently archived a few years worth of people's comments. And then I did it again! Feel free to leave me messages or even flaming bags filled with poo.
Contents |
[edit] Friendly objection
Hi, I added the link to the Capital Hill massacre page. Although I agree that you can google the lyrics, the song is nowhere to be found on any official or unofficial fan sites, including lists of rare songs, etc. I can only find it on generic song lyric pages. I added this because I found it disturbing, but I'll leave it up to you.
[edit] No poo for you
Just a note to let you know that there's a Checkuser request right now for your account and the IP's that spamvandalized a bunch of "ED v. MONGO/ArbCom" dispute participants, including yours. I have added some of the IP's to the case. Thank you.. -- User:RyanFreisling @ 05:51, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Re: "Squidward"
If it's not you, it's not you. Wiki-stalking me will not do you any good.--Konst.ableTalk 06:25, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
- huh? wikistalking? I read AN/I. I "squidwarded" because someone said that word in an edit summary brings bot attention. My career makes squicking automated tasks an irrestible attraction. (and as to SPUI, I wish he'd figure out how to get along with people.) SchmuckyTheCat 06:33, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
- Likewise for me, Schmucky, though in my case it felt to me more like trolling on your part. Thanks. -- User:RyanFreisling @ 06:31, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
Keep it spinning, Ryan.
[edit] Notice
Note that our User:Instantnood has gotten to reverting articles right after the one week ban, including the article in which he was gulty of breaching the 3RR ([1], [2], plus [3]. More may be on the way. Note that he has recently launched a "new initiative" in justifying all his revert warring by claiming there is a new "standard" in refering to the "Hong Kong Special Administrative Region" only as the "Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China". [4] Utter nonsense, but yeah, what else can we expect from a desperado.--Huaiwei 23:01, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
- I have also dropped a notice in the admin's talkpage User talk:Joelr31. Our friend goes about acting pitiful, whining about his innocence and attempts to justify his chronic obsessive reversion behavior yet again.--Huaiwei 23:06, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
- cute wikilinking. SchmuckyTheCat 03:00, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Notice #2
Our User:Instantnood is now into weekend wikiwars, with a stagering range of reverts ignited in a matter of hours alone. Do note his recent foray into disruptive editing, which is most clearly evident in [5] and [6]. Also note that he is now persisting in using his latest revert excuse...that "official full names" should be used everywhere.--Huaiwei 14:17, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
- You clearly are missing something. I never said "official full names" should be used everywhere. Rather, I said full name or short name. Can you name any country which its partial full name is used, instead of its short name or full name? As for coast guard, I was only applying your logic. I have no strong opinion on whether the article should cover those not named coastguard or not (though it's always better to provide all relevant information whenever possible). — Instantnood 14:47, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
- Missing what, my dear friend? Your logic? Just what is a "partial full name", may I know? And why bother asking me to name a country with such a characteristic, when the entity in question is not a country anyway? Meanwhile, thanks for your confirmation that you are practising disruptive editing! :D--Huaiwei 15:35, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
- I don't think I have to elaborate what a partial full name is. It's always important to maintain the quality of any article. You can't remove some of the coast guards because of their names, while keeping the others regardless of their names. — Instantnood 16:40, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
- Oh yes you jolly well have to, because no one can comprehend your lame reverting excuse. Meanwhile I am removing that entry from a section in which all entries are refered to as coast guards, and the descriptions are clearly meant to demonstrate the differing meanings they can have in different contexts around the world. How does the HK entry contribute to that section when it is not significantly different from the entries already listed, is not a major player, and is not even remotely referred to as a coast guard? If you want to be disruptive and play your "consistency only when it suits you" game, be my guest. I will be expecting to see you changing all names of political entities throughout wikipedia to their "full names".--Huaiwei 16:57, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
- I don't think I have to elaborate what a partial full name is. It's always important to maintain the quality of any article. You can't remove some of the coast guards because of their names, while keeping the others regardless of their names. — Instantnood 16:40, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
- Missing what, my dear friend? Your logic? Just what is a "partial full name", may I know? And why bother asking me to name a country with such a characteristic, when the entity in question is not a country anyway? Meanwhile, thanks for your confirmation that you are practising disruptive editing! :D--Huaiwei 15:35, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Your vote on the AFD
I noticed that you voted a keep on this page. I'm not trying to sway you from your vote, but is there another reason you could put for the keep besides 'I like big butts and I cannot lie'? If you could put another reason there it may help other editors see your point of view. Thanks- CattleGirl talk | e@ 04:18, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
What makes you think you know what's best for everyone who wants to know more about the USB connectors than what is there, without my additions of the other Mini-USB connectors? As long as what I add is correct, and properly documented, why deprive the world of it because it's not as usaeful as other info? I am about to add more info, and I no longer think they are non-standard as I am finding more and more products that use them (and yes, I'm keeping a list of links to the sources of that info).
BTW, there are errors in your Pictures page.
Jim
[edit] Greetings
[7]: So, I see your reports of your departure were, as Mark Twan would say "greatly exaggerated". Good to see you are stil here. But I won't be asking you for directions to Dick's. - Jmabel | Talk 05:27, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] RFA Thanks
Thanks! | |
---|---|
Thanks for your input on my (nearly recent) Request for adminship, which regretfully achived no consensus, with votes of 68/28/2. I am grateful for the input received, both positive and in opposition, and I'd like to thank you for your participation. | |
Georgewilliamherbert 05:42, 16 November 2006 (UTC) |
[edit] You
are hopefully a regular contributor to Uncyclopedia. You're hilarious. 82.93.133.130 12:44, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
- No. They are an unfunny ripoff of ED.
[edit] Notice
Check out User:Michael G. Davis contributions in the space of just about 2 hours since registering (from [8] to [9]). Seems suspicious? ;)--Huaiwei 00:43, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
- And lo-behold! Our best friend appears right at about the same time! [10]--Huaiwei 00:47, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Hmm...
Would you care to explain what...
- This [11] was a rather humourous vandalism of my page. I wish I had a Praise Allah key on my keyboard. I'd be hitting it as hard as I could. Maybe that's what broke it.
... is supposed to mean? -- tariqabjotu 17:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
-
- Look at the diff. Someone vandalized my page to say I broke my "Praise Allah" key. SchmuckyTheCat 17:21, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- Ah... I see that. But the image? -- tariqabjotu 17:23, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
- A reference to the show Aqua Teen Hunger Force that was deleted long ago, ruining my joke. SchmuckyTheCat 17:32, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
- And, if you are wondering about my "wow" comment, it's not about you, it's a reaction that what you said needed saying at all. SchmuckyTheCat 17:36, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
- Ah... I see that. But the image? -- tariqabjotu 17:23, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
-
[edit] SDT Disambiguation
I hadn't realised that there were rules about adding disambiguation pages where only one of the options was a valid link.
Would my edit have been acceptable to you if I hadn't included the link syntax around Service Descriptor Table? DVB digital television is becoming a hot topic and doing a wikipedia search for SDT would be nice to give its digital TV definition.MendipBlue 14:55, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks! (zoom zoom)
[edit] Welcome back!
Yo, Schmucky! Been way too long!! How's the fellow gearhead? - Lucky 6.9 05:54, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] SARS
Re [12] - Please note SARs ≠ SARS. — Instantnood 07:43, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
- oh.
[edit] List of cities in the PRC
Re [13] - Please read each of my previous edits and the edit summaries [14]. Thanks. — Instantnood 08:07, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
- no, use the talk page of the article for your problems. Wikipedia is a community effort and edit summaries are not meant to be conversation. SchmuckyTheCat 08:21, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Sorry
My apologies for wasting your time by creating the nonsense category Wikipedians who stop the cars and wave in the children. Please accept this peace dove. |
Wdflake |