Talk:School of Thinking
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] NPOV
Like Michael Hewitt-Gleeson, this section appears to be seriously POV. Not sourced; FAR from neutral, not particularily notable except to the people involved. jesup 11:37, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
First, a little note about simple courtesy. Whoever wants to make a note of any importance should at least leave his identification behind although this is still available in the history page, thanks to the brilliance of the developers of the wiki software. Be brave to put your name on your opinion, unless those opinions are not worth the bytes that it consumes.
Second, the statements made are very sweeping and subjective, except for "unsourced" for Mhewittg's latest addition. Under the circumstances, one can just courteously ask Mhewittg to provide the source without adding a lot of nonsense.
"FAR from neutral." What animal is that? Isn't it just an unsupported judgement? A statement like that would be thrown out of court, unless it is a kangaroo court. "Not particularly notable except to the people involved." In what sense? It is only when you provide supporting facts do these judgement makes sense.
In fact, the talker just talk, and he thinks he is contributing. I say he is just hurting this portal where ordinary people are trying to chip in with whatever little they may have by way of writing experience. The talker contributes nothing by way of time and effort to improve the article.
So to be fair to all of us, I guess the anonymous writer should show us how to make it neutral. After all, it is not as if we are paid, and he is not. — PM Poon 06:34, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
