Talk:Schlock Mercenary
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Webcomics, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to webcomics on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article Schlock Mercenary, or visit the project page for more details on the projects. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. |
This article has been overrun by Schlock Mercenary fans, eager for a place to store technical data and other details about the convoluted comic. The expected outcome is a rush of new info in some need of wikification, followed by a slower rise to the standards. I apologize for any inconvenience this may cause. Should you think ill of this, then I'd like to point out that the non-spoiler part will stay as good as it was, if not better, other comic pages have stuff that benefits only the readership (I love the list of panda attacks over at PvP), the strip is a Keenspot member which gives it a high degree of notability, and that reading below the spoiler line will have about the same effect to someone who doesn't follow the comic as doing so with another comic's article will do, as the tech is a large part of what makes Schlock good to its fans.
W00t. -- Kizor 02:59, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- This is so awful it makes my head hurt. This information is of no use to anyone. It's got too much disorganized trivia for regular people to digest, and not enough detail for fans. I'm cutting it down and rewriting it into something useful for the average reader.
- I'd suggest fans head over to Wikicities and start a (free) Schlock Mercenary fan site there. There you can talk about genetically enhanced chimpanzees joining the judiciary and carbosilicate amorphs all you want. -- Cyrius|✎ 00:54, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Erm, I think Chupaqueso's are real... I've heard of them before Howard Taylor mentioned them, though untill he said what it was I didn't know much more then that it was a foodstuff. So why doesn't it have it's own wikipedia page?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 204.95.11.137 (talk • contribs) .
- It is a real food, but it's Howard Tayler's own creation, and I don't know that it's made enough penetration in the popular culture to merit its own article. –Abe Dashiell (t/c) 23:50, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Chupaqueso in the cookbook
The full recipe, while nice, takes an awful lot of space for a marginally relevant subject. Should it be moved to the relevant part of Wikibooks, and if yes, could someone with the faintest idea on how to do this do so? --Kizor 20:14, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
