User talk:Saturnight
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
My contributions aren't very controversial, it seems, so this page remains pretty empty :)
Contents |
[edit] Dutch Wikipedia symposium in Rotterdam (27/11/2004)
Hi,
As a personal initiative I want to mention to you http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Symposium/Najaar_2004
There have been some voices that Dutch-speaking Belgian wikipedians might be underrepresented at that venue, so I took the liberty to post this message on the talk page of all people I found on Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Belgium.
If this doesn't apply to you (e.g. while French-speaking, or not interested in Dutch wikipedia,...) simply ignore this message.
--Francis Schonken 09:42, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC)
[edit] Broadcast flag
I believe I've addressed your objections to the POV in the article. Would you care to review it? --Dante Alighieri | Talk 18:36, May 6, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] eerste nl.wikimedia.org ontmoeting
ik zou iedereen graag willen uitnodigen te overwegen of zij een rol willen en/of kunnen spelen in de oprichting van een nederlandse wikimedia-organisatie. een eerste ontmoeting wordt momenteel georganiseerd, zie daarvoor hier, op de nl.wikimedia.org wiki. er zijn nog vele stappen te nemen, en meer wikianen nodig, om e.e.a. op verantwoorde wijze verder te ontwikkelen. Radiant_>|< 10:50, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Business Plot: npov and copyvio?
About a week ago, I stumbled upon Business Plot. It was very POV and almost literally copied from this homepage. I added a copyvio notice. However, it turns out that the original author died 6 years ago, and I have no idea about who owns the copyright right now. There's a (c) statement on the homepage:
© Copyright 1996 by Steve Kangas. Text can be quoted freely for non-commercial purposes only, with proper attribution.
I don't know if this is enough to re-include the content without permission in Wikipedia under the GFDL. And in any case, the article needs a "thorough revision" to conform to npov standards, backed up by objective sources. I'd prefer it if it was simply rewritten. One user (I presume; his IP address changes sometimes) has been petitioning me to put the original content back and just add an npov notice, but I'd rather not without consulting more experienced wikipedians. saturnight 22:01, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)
No, that's not enough. Non-commercial purposes only is not compatible with the GFDL. Keep marked as a copyvio. --cesarb 22:23, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
