User talk:Sargonious

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4

Contents

[edit] Assyrian people

The page is protected. The talk page explains it all.סרגון יוחנא 21:20, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

if you could avoid this sort of thing please? Don't archive active sections. Least of all by page moves, it messes up editing history, and don't use the archiving process as a tool of content disputes. Try to address good faith concerns with good faith arguments, even if you are Satan or whatever. dab (ᛏ) 19:35, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
Knock it off, Sargon. Khoikhoi 23:10, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
I'm just asking you to stop archiving active discussion. Khoikhoi 23:18, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Archiving

All i see is a mess! A total mess! I am really not following the chronology of events! I can't follow the mess re to the archiving process!!! -- Szvest 23:29, 10 November 2006 (UTC) Wiki me up ®

The solution to that is what i did (not just being bold but Archive 5 is soooo short!). I hope it is ok now. -- Szvest 23:42, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
Lol...what? Khoikhoi 23:31, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
I disagree, things were still being disucssed and now it's all in the archives. To me it doesn't look like a mess... Khoikhoi 23:43, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
You can restart discussions. You can copy and paste them. There are a lot of ways but is it acceptable to witness an edit warring about stupid stuff? -- Szvest 23:45, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
I don't see why we should have to restart it if it's already there. Every time a talk page gets three threads it's time to archive? It's easier to have it all on one page for everyone to see it. By archiving it all you are essentially stopping everything short. Khoikhoi 23:49, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
Back to my first comment then...So what was the reason of archiving a short discussion? -- Szvest 23:54, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
I'm not sure what Sargon's reason was. :-( Khoikhoi 23:56, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] It was not a short discussion.

It was starting to drag.סרגון יוחנא 18:34, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Please do not make comments like this again. It is considered a personal attack, and also violates WP:TROLL. Thank you. Khoikhoi 01:00, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
I am not "abusing my privelages", please provide evidence. It was obvious that it was intended as an insult; don't do it again. Khoikhoi 03:43, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Blanking talk page

I blank my talk page every now and then because you keep filling it with your blatant nonsense. --Benne ['bɛnə] (talk) 09:40, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

It's Jimbo's request to delete unsourced material. Khoikhoi 23:52, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Dude you're using policy to enact whatever you want. You're interpreting policy in your own view.סרגון יוחנא
Hardly. Give me a few minutes to find the email. Khoikhoi 23:56, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Here you go: [1] Khoikhoi 00:01, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
No, but it's unsourced. Khoikhoi 00:11, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
Again you're interpreting it in your own way. It specifically mentions preposterous claims when using an example. You are not free to interpret rules just to suit your needs.סרגון יוחנא 00:12, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Re Khoikhoi is reverting anything I contribute to.

Hi Sargon. I've just checked that and found that Khoikhoi has been reverting unsourced material. You say [sic] You will find sources. In the mean time stop reverting it. In order to sort this out, why could you not bring the sources. The material you are inserting is important and does not concern a phrase or a word but 2 paragraphs. So, please bring the sources as per WP:OR and WP:V. Szvest Wiki me up ® 09:31, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Iraq page move

Hi again Sargon. Thanks for the note. It is fixed now. -- Szvest → Wiki Me Up ® 14:11, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Quote

Thanks! I like it too. Khoikhoi 23:03, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../s/a/r/User_talk%7ESargonious_23f2.html"