User talk:Sangil

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] A welcome from Sputnik

Hi, Sangil, Welcome to Wikipedia!

- СПУТНИК^{ССС Р} 22:08, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Sangil photo 1.jpg

Hi, can you take a look at Image:Sangil photo 1.jpg, you've indicated that you made the photo yourself, and I've taged it as GFDL presumed. If you would indeed like to release it under the GFDL license, please change {{GFDL-Presumed}} to {{GFDL}}. If not, please place the approrpiate license tag on the page. Thank you! --lightdarkness ^(talk) 03:24, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Palestine

I saw you were recently involved with this page's discussion, as such I was wondering if you think it is necessesary to have half of this page devoted to History, I understand why we should go back to Ottoman times but should we really go all the way back to Roman times especially since we already have a History of Palestine article.- Moshe Constantine Hassan Al-Silverburg | Talk 02:10, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

I completley agree my proposal was to go back as far as the ottoman period and maybe include somthing about why the Romans named the province palestine.- Moshe Constantine Hassan Al-Silverburg | Talk 08:40, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your revert on Palestinian territories

Would you mind explaining on the discussion page why you think the information you deleted is not relevant? Thanks! Palmiro | Talk 15:44, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

OK, I have explained my position on the talk page (though I essentially saying the same things I said before to SlimVirgin), and look forward to hearing your reply ;) Palmiro | Talk 15:49, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

In case we Palestinians ever get annihilated (something I fear is getting closer and closer every day), I hope to convince you of something:

I realize that Israelis usually lump all Arabs together - but the truth is that I can tell you as a Palestinian that I feel no close relation to the native (non-refugee) people of the surrounding countries. It's really funny when you write "they (Palestinians) have not been allowed to become citizens of the Countries where they currently reside, they have remained 'Palestinian' by default" - because even if they were made citizens - as in Jordan - they would still remain Palestinian by ethnicity. Also, let me ask you personally - would YOU want to become a citizen of a place like Saudi Arabia or Egypt? My guess is no - and I can tell you that I wouldn't either - for reasons that are probably very similar to yours.

So I hope that you realize that most Palestinians completely abhor Arab regimes. The one thing Hamas has done once it got elected is try to reach out to the West (okay okay and Iran but hey, they offered money), whereas Fatah leaders always went to kiss Arab leader's asses and ask for money. So I guess what I'm trying to say is, as a Palestinian, please don't make the mistake of lumping all the 'Arabs' together in one basket. I've known enough Israelis to know that what I am saying may sound very strange to you and contrary to everything you have learned, but you hopefully learn new things every day. We Palestinians are victims of the Arab countries as much as Israelis are (actually probably much more). Ramallite ^(talk) 05:03, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] List of Hamas Terror Attacks

List of Hamas terror attacks

[edit] Palestine

You appear to have deleted the bulk of this article and you are also adding controversial claims without citing sources. Please abide by Wikipeida policy, e.g. WP:RS. --Ian Pitchford 19:14, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] King David Hotel bombing

Hello, I've posted comments about the changes that you've just made to the King David Hotel Bombing article, which I hope you'll read and respond to, in the article's Talk section. --ZScarpia 14:13, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 3 months?

Yes, actually, 3 months. :-) Jayjg ^(talk) 22:51, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hi, Sangil!

אהלן! רק רציתי להודיע לך, שהשארתי לך הודעה בדף השיחה שלך בויקי בספרדית; אני מקווה שתארח לי שם חברה, אני הישראלי היחיד או כמעט היחיד שם!. בברכה

Cucaracha (Mensajes)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Begin.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Begin.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:53, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your message

Hi Sangil, I am also overwhelmed but I'll try to take a look. You know about WP:DR, right? ←Humus sapiens ^ну? 05:03, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging for Image:Reading israel night.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Reading israel night.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:09, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Begin spillover

Hey Sangil... Re: Post-Zionism v. Left Zionism... You are, of course, correct to point out that there are elements of left zionism which advocate the perspective which I presented within our mini-debate on the Begin page, but, at the same time, I do believe that a few specific post-zionist figures have done a far better job at provoking a global debate about past and current Israeli policies than any Israeli political parties/figures... I support this, just as I support the existance of an equally embittered group of American social critics, for I think that every nation should have a school of thought which dredges through the dirt of the past and present and tries to make society discuss the implications of their past and current actions. Some of the post-zionists surely go to far in their implications, but I think that others (including, in his better moments, Benny Morris) simply help individuals learn about Israel's "warts"--and, as we all know, every nation has it's own warts to hide (mine, in particular... but that's another story entirely). If and when the post-Zionists go too far (and I'm sure that Benny Morris has done just that, at some time or other), what the hell... He's given you a damn good reason to grab a Goldstar.

In the end, I think that the more egregious arguements which are presented by the post-zionists will be ignored (for two reasons: 1) the majority of the Western world will disagree with them; and 2) the anti-semites are still preoccupied with the Protocols of the Elders of Zion), but their stronger arguements will remind people of a fact frequently forgotten over here in the States--the fact that the Palestinians are human, regardless of what a specific leader or movement claims to stand for. I have no doubt that you know that, but I have a feeling that you may be giving the rest of the world a little too much credit (again, I come from a nation in which less than half of the population can locate on a map the nation that we are currently at war with)...

Anyway. I hope that Abbas goes through with his referendum and is able to carry the bulk of the Palestinian population with him. Until our next wiki debate, (Mingus ah um 08:16, 30 May 2006 (UTC))

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Yitzhak shamir.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Yitzhak shamir.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 03:43, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

If you got this image from the Dutch Wikipedia, please provide a link to that image, and give the original source. —Bkell (talk) 03:43, 2 August 2006 (UTC)