User talk:Ryan2807

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Ryan2807, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 

Telsa (talk) 08:15, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Seven Sisters

Hey, thanks for your additions to Seven Sisters, Wales. It needed fleshing out, and it has answered at least one question I had about the place: why the name :). Have you a reference you could add, for people interested in reading more about the history? Telsa (talk) 08:15, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Lost edit

There was a note in there not credit Henry with season 2+. You also removed two citations. If you disagree, please discuss your reasons on the article's talk page. Jtrost (T | C | #) 21:48, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Selected articles on Portal:F1

Hello again.

I dropped notes round a while back to those who have listed themselves at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Formula_One to ask for suggestions for selected articles on portal:Formula One. There was a pretty good response, both in terms of how it might work and of articles suggested. Damon Hill came out with the most support and was brought up to Good Article standard after a lot of work by Skully Collins and others before going on as the F1 portal selected article a couple of weeks ago. It is now at Featured Article Candidates as a Featured Article candidate (why not drop by and see if you can help polish it further?).

Several people who responded to the original request suggested that a monthly or bi-weekly 'Selected Article' could act as a catalyst for an improvement drive to get more articles up to a higher standard. Although it wasn't quite what I had in mind when I started, this seemed to work pretty well for the Damon Hill article, so I've drafted up a process for doing this more regularly. See Portal_talk:Formula_One/Management_of_selected_articles for details. Essentially the suggestion is that we vote for an article to improve every couple of weeks and at the end of the improvement process the article goes on the portal as the new 'Selected Article'. I'd be grateful for any comments on how this might work - I'm sure some of you are more familiar with things 'Wiki' than me - as well as your votes for the next candidate (by 16 July).

You may also want to help with the article Gilles Villeneuve, which was the next most popular after Damon Hill. The idea is to try and get it up to GA standard by 16 July and then put it on the portal as the 'Selected Article'. I hope you can help! 4u1e 18:22, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Nicole Garza

Thanks for adding her photo to the article. It is an article that I created originally, so thank you for improving it. -FateSmiled&DestinyLaughed 16:14, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Super 14 image

I've changed Image:Super 14 cup.JPG from GFDL to fair use. - brenneman {L} 14:57, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] C4

How do you get channel 4 when its S4C in wales? Matthew Fenton (Talk | Contribs) 15:59, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Yes. Okay, I never considerd the digital platforms. Matthew Fenton (Talk | Contribs) 16:05, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

So, is your name really Ryan or you just a fan of The O.C. who likes to be called Ryan :-P? Matthew Fenton (Talk | Contribs) 17:52, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Hehe :-) Matthew Fenton (Talk | Contribs) 17:58, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Hi, if you plan on uploading new screencaps use the "upload a new version of this file" feature please. Dont upload a new one when an existing one already exists which can be replaced. Thanks MatthewFenton (talkcontribs) 17:32, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Colours

Hi, could you please add your opinion or a support or a oppose at this page it could decide the fate of colours in not only episode infoboxes but, nav boxes, celeb boxes.. etc. MatthewFenton (talkcontribs) 09:36, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Navi rawat.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Navi rawat.JPG. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 18:08, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Garza twins.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Garza twins.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 04:31, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Navi rawat.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Navi rawat.JPG. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 21:31, 9 November 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Image:Eric Balfour.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Eric Balfour.JPG. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Oden 05:58, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

  • Note: also lacks detailed fair use rationale. --Oden 05:58, 29 November 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Image:Jlc.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Jlc.JPG. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Quentin X 17:17, 29 November 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Image:Solskjaer.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Solskjaer.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Quentin X 13:31, 8 December 2006 (UTC)