User talk:RYANonWIKIPEDIA
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Hardy Boyz
DO NOT ADD WEEK BY WEEK EVENTS, RUMORS OR SPECULATION. THIS INCLUDES ANNOUNCED MATCHES THAT HAVE NOT YET OCCURRED. WIKIPEDIA IS NOT A NEWS SITE BUT AN ONLINE ENCYCLOPAEDIA. Please see the articles "Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not" and "Wikipedia:Guide to writing better articles" for more information.
I'm sorry, but what don't you understand about this? Its a fairly simple concept to understand. If you keep adding these future events, you will be reported. Thanks. -- Mikedk9109 (talk) 00:20, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] ECW December to Dismember
Did you choose to ignore that warning on purpose? It says not to add in matches that haven't been announced on WWE TV or wwe.com, only 2 matches have been announced. TJ Spyke 04:37, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] WWE Armageddon
The matches are listed in the order wwe.com has them listed. So talk to WWE if you have a problem. TJ Spyke 22:39, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
- WWE.com doesn't control Wikipedia. The order doesn't have to be the same. People aren't comparing the article and WWE.com and saying "this sucks, it's not the same order.. the article is horrible" or anything like that. When the event takes place, the match order is usually not the same as what was posted on WWE.com... so it doesn't matter. Being accurate is one thing, but being obsessive about the order isn't needed. The main event obviously should be on the top, but the other matches don't make a difference when it comes to the order. RobJ1981 22:46, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
- WWE almost always lists the main event/biggest match first. They do so to help sell the PPV since they know most people will care more about something like Batista/Finlay than Benoit/Guerreo for example. TJ Spyke 22:47, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
- They only list the biggest match first. I think they add the rest of the matches based on when they are announced, and they announced the Inferno match before the Last Ride match. TJ Spyke 22:51, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
- ?? I'm just explaining why I think they order the matches the way they do. I'm not "fighting", i've just been saying how wwe.com lists the matches and a plausible explanation for the reason why they list them that way. TJ Spyke 22:56, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
- TJ thinks it's right, so anything against his opinion...gets reverted and changed. There is no set Pro Wrestling Project policy on this matter. The only things that make sense when making a match order: main event at the top, champions are listed first. Anything else should be done however, and not just a "set" way just to be a copy of WWE's preview on their website. The order changes when the event takes place anyway...so the match order on right now is temporary... so it shouldn't be a big deal if it's not a copy of WWE.com. RobJ1981 19:33, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
- ?? I'm just explaining why I think they order the matches the way they do. I'm not "fighting", i've just been saying how wwe.com lists the matches and a plausible explanation for the reason why they list them that way. TJ Spyke 22:56, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
- They only list the biggest match first. I think they add the rest of the matches based on when they are announced, and they announced the Inferno match before the Last Ride match. TJ Spyke 22:51, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
- WWE almost always lists the main event/biggest match first. They do so to help sell the PPV since they know most people will care more about something like Batista/Finlay than Benoit/Guerreo for example. TJ Spyke 22:47, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia policy does NOT allow non-free images on ANY USER PAGES
Please do not include non-free images (images uploaded to Wikipedia without the permission of the copyright owner, or under licenses that do not permit commercial use) on your user page or on any subpage thereof (this is official policy and the usual wide user page latitude does not apply, see Wikipedia:Fair use criteria for details). Non-free images found on a user page (including user talk pages) may be removed (preferably by replacing it with a link to the image) from that page without warning (and, if not used in a Wikipedia article, deleted entirely). -- bulletproof 3:16 23:43, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
- It is Wikipedia policy. Per Wikipedia:User page, you are not allowed to use these images on your user page. If you disagree with these official policies and guidelines, then you are free to discuss them here (Wikipedia talk:User page). However, if you continue this blatant disruption, I would be more than happy to report you to an admin. -- bulletproof 3:16 23:55, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
