Talk:Rush discography
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Singles Layout
First off, excellent work adding all the other singles.
However what I think we need to do is add more detail. I'd like to see the following:-
- Different Formats (12" with extra tracks?)
- "B" Sides - Especially otherwise unavailable ones - I've got a 7" copy of "Countdown" (IIRC) with an interview on the "B" Side...
- Chart Placings in major markets US, Canada, UK
- Parent Album
- Other comments - e.g. my UK 7" of Spirit of Radio (note the name) is edited down to under 4 minutes...
Thoughts? Megamanic 08:59, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
- I think the details should be placed on the individual song and album articles in a table detailing the different releases.
- Format (CD, Vinyl, ect.)
- Country
- Catalog Number
- Parent Album
- The chart positions in the various countries could be detailed in another table or list. (Metnever)
[edit] Overall Layout
I asked over at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Rock_music & was told that the Oasis discography is the model to follow. Have a look, I think it looks great & has just about anything a sane fan could want clearly presented. Now getting all that info could be fun but my vote is to copy the format & leave the stuff we don't know as gaps for others to fill. I'm not going to do it without discussion though. Have a look & see what you think. Megamanic 01:51, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
- Sounds good, but I'd like to keep the studio and live albums in one list. (Metnever 16:44, 20 November 2006 (UTC))
- I know what you're saying but if we have the live albums in sequence we need to colour code the rows IMHO. I certainly don't think compilations should be in sequence - it annoys the heck out of me when they are but I'm flexible about the live albums if we can fix the table so it's clear what's studio & what's live. Otherwise what do you think? Megamanic 06:42, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
- We could put "Live" in the album information cell. (Metnever 22:49, 22 November 2006 (UTC))
- Revert it if you really hate it but I think we have a winner Megamanic 01:28, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
- This will work well, looks good. You messed up on the table but I fixed it. (24.28.146.88 19:37, 23 November 2006 (UTC))
- Revert it if you really hate it but I think we have a winner Megamanic 01:28, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
- We could put "Live" in the album information cell. (Metnever 22:49, 22 November 2006 (UTC))
- I know what you're saying but if we have the live albums in sequence we need to colour code the rows IMHO. I certainly don't think compilations should be in sequence - it annoys the heck out of me when they are but I'm flexible about the live albums if we can fix the table so it's clear what's studio & what's live. Otherwise what do you think? Megamanic 06:42, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
