|
|
 |
A userbox is a small box that looks like this. |
|
 |
Please stop reinserting this false claim (the removal of which was not "vandalism"). It misleads other users (who might turn to you for administrative assistance), regardless of whether you display it above a directly contradictory statement. Thank you. —David Levy 03:07, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
no thank you mr david levy you are a true wikipatriot Puchu 10:25, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
|
|
|
|
| Userboxes can come in many different styles |
 |
|
| mac |
This user is contributing using a Macintosh computer |
|
 |
This user contributes using a PC |
|
|
|
| ferry |
One day back in 1896 this user was crossing over to Jersey on the ferry and as it pulled out there was another ferry pulling in and on it there was a girl waiting to get off. A white dress she had on. She was carrying a white parasol. This user only saw her for one second. She didn't see this user at all but this user will bet a month hasn't gone by since that this user hasn't thought of that girl. |
|
| Per terms of Wikipedia:Fair use criteria item #9, you are not permitted to have images (such as Image:Inspector Gadget14.jpg and Image:Doomhousetitle.jpg) on your userpage which are tagged with a fair use tag, such at {{logo}} or {{movie-screenshot}}. Such images have been removed from your page several times now, and the most recent removal was reverted by you. Please understand that this policy is not optional; you may not use such images on your userpage. If you revert these removals again, it will constitute vandalism and may eventually lead to a temporary block of your editing privileges. If you have questions about this matter, I'd be happy to answer. All the best, --Durin 13:37, 1 June 2006 (UTC) |
A DOOM HOUSE?!?!?!? |
|
| Per terms of Wikipedia:Fair use criteria item #9, you are not permitted to have images (such as Image:Inspector Gadget14.jpg and Image:Doomhousetitle.jpg) on your userpage which are tagged with a fair use tag, such at {{logo}} or {{movie-screenshot}}. Such images have been removed from your page several times now, and the most recent removal was reverted by you. Please understand that this policy is not optional; you may not use such images on your userpage. If you revert these removals again, it will constitute vandalism and may eventually lead to a temporary block of your editing privileges. If you have questions about this matter, I'd be happy to answer. All the best, --Durin 13:37, 1 June 2006 (UTC) |
I'll get you next time Gadget |
|
| Per terms of Wikipedia:Fair use criteria item #9, you are not permitted to have images (such as Image:Inspector Gadget14.jpg and Image:Doomhousetitle.jpg) on your userpage which are tagged with a fair use tag, such at {{logo}} or {{movie-screenshot}}. Such images have been removed from your page several times now, and the most recent removal was reverted by you. Please understand that this policy is not optional; you may not use such images on your userpage. If you revert these removals again, it will constitute vandalism and may eventually lead to a temporary block of your editing privileges. If you have questions about this matter, I'd be happy to answer. All the best, --Durin 13:37, 1 June 2006 (UTC) |
Next time!!! |
|
|
|
| gatsby |
In my younger and more vulnerable years my father gave me some advice that I've been turning over in my mind ever since.
"Whenever you feel like criticizing any one," he told me, "just remember that all the people in this world haven't had the advantages that you've had."
He didn't say any more, but we've always been unusually communicative in a reserved way, and I understood that he meant a great deal more than that. In consequence, I'm inclined to reserve all judgments, a habit that has opened up many curious natures to me and also made me the victim of not a few veteran bores. The abnormal mind is quick to detect and attach itself to this quality when it appears in a normal person, and so it came about that in college I was unjustly accused of being a politician, because I was privy to the secret griefs of wild, unknown men. Most of the confidences were unsought--frequently I have feigned sleep, preoccupation, or a hostile levity when I realized by some unmistakable sign that an intimate revelation was quivering on the horizon; for the intimate revelations of young men, or at least the terms in which they express them, are usually plagiaristic and marred by obvious suppressions. Reserving judgments is a matter of infinite hope. I am still a little afraid of missing something if I forget that, as my father snobbishly suggested, and I snobbishly repeat, a sense of the fundamental decencies is parcelled out unequally at birth.
|
|
|
|
|
|
