User talk:Rovoam

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I invite you to come have a talk about the Nagorno-Karabakh article. I do not have an interest in either POV I see there (I also do not have a lot of time for this). My primary interest here is respect for the wiki-process and the accuracy of articles. — Davenbelle 00:39, Feb 16, 2005 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Images

Thanks for uploading Image:Armeniamap2.jpg. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use {{gfdl}} if you release it under the GFDL, or {{fairuse}} if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know where you got the images (on my talk page) and I'll tag them for you. Thanks so much, BrokenSegue 21:57, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)

I will add this a little later. In all cases, this is temp. usage. There is a discussion currently in progress on Nagorno-Karabakh discussion page. Rovoam 22:06, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC) Thank you

The discussion using this image has been archived. Shall I delete the image? BrokenSegue 02:45, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This is solely up to you... Rovoam 22:44, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This map must be public domain, due to its date, should be tagged as public domain. Justinc 08:59, 3 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] User:Rovoam/Nagorno Karabakh Republic

Hi Rovoam, I noticed that you are working on a version of the NKR article. I've read what you've written and like a lot of what I see. However, you were working in the main article space, not your user space, which is where such works in-progress should be. I'm sure this was entirely inadvertent. I have moved the page into your user space; this has preserved the edit history of what you've done.

The new location is:

User:Rovoam/Nagorno Karabakh Republic

and the old location is:

Rovoam/Nagorno Karabakh Republic

The old location is now a redirect to the new location; I will be tagging the redirect for speedy deletion; please do not take offense.

Best wishes, Davenbelle 01:40, Feb 20, 2005 (UTC)

Thank you, Davenbelle, for pointing this out. I will do my best in writing this article.
Rovoam 03:19, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)


[edit] Three revert rule

You have been blocked for 24 hours under the three revert rule. If you wish to appeal please contact another administrator or the mailing list.Geni 11:34, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Three Revert Rule: User:64.136.27.228 aka User:Rovoam

User:64.136.27.228 aka User:Rovoam, this is a last warning to you. Stop vandalizing and pushing your bias in Nagorno-Karabakh page. User:Rovoam, stop using anon IP for purpuses of vandalism, circumventing Wikipedia policy (esp. 3 revert rule) and deception and impersonation. This may cost you your membership in Wikipedia. --Tabib 12:43, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] How many reverts are allowed for Turkic people?

It seems that if you are Turk you are allowed to do unlimited reverts (just because vandalism is the Turkish natural behaviur), but everybody else need to learn how to become a Turk. Wikipedia will soon become a Turkipedia. This is real now!

66.53.55.53 21:00, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Mediation

Rovoam,

User:Tabib has made a formal request for official mediation with you regarding the disputes between the two of you regarding Nagorno-Karabakh.

You should visit Wikipedia:Requests for mediation and indicate whom you would like to mediate in the case. The two of you must agree on at least one neutral party to mediate the dispute.

- Keith D. Tyler [AMA] 21:31, Mar 2, 2005 (UTC)

Dear Keith D. Tyler:
I am not going to deal with this uneducated and uncivilized user any more. I don't care about him and his Turkic problems. Wikipedia is no longer my favorite site (thanks to him). If I need information, I would rather visit some other trusted Internet sites, like Encyclopedia Britannica or Jewish Encyclopedia, but not Wikipedia, which contains obscure and undeserving trust articles, written or edited by persons like Tabib.
As far as mediation process, let him write in his articles whatever he wants to write. From his Turkic point of view, Turks invented first alphabet, they founded Troy, they wrote Bible, Jesus Christ, Karl Marks, William Shakespeare and Friedrich Nietzsche were all Turks, and even Wikipedia was developed by Turks. If you are not disturbed with quality of articles, written for Wikipedia, neither shall I. I am not going to argue with all his nonsense. Just because I respect myself and I value my time.
As far as I know, he has already requested dozens of mediation requests with other users. If he continues, you will have to spend all your life, resolving his numerous complaints.
I am sorry, but you have to deal with this user without my help. I had enough of Tabib already! And I believe he is seriously sick and needs to visit his psychiatrist, but I am not a doctor. Sorry!
With best regards,
Rovoam 04:22, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)
You will be held responsible for your groundless accusations and personal attacks on me and my ethnic background contained in your post above as well as in numerous posts in Talk:Nagorno-Karabakh. Wait for your turn.--Tabib 08:10, Mar 3, 2005 (UTC)
I am sorry, Tabib, if my good wishes for your mental health sounded like an abuse or even personal attack on your ethnic background, but I really wanted to help you to get out and away of your terrible situation. I really believe that you have to see your doctor as soon as possible. Try not to use Internet for at least few weeks. You seem to be too involved personally, having conflicts with so many people around you. Get well! Rovoam 08:50, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Dear Friend ROVOAM

Dear Friend A. Kirsanoff, Thank you very much for your kind message on my TALK page. It is indeed with great interest that I and my brother in law have read your excellent Russian contributions on Wikipedia. Please do contact us at: Michael_Bloese@mac.com , as we would like to exchange some interesting mutual data too, not yet added to this forum yet. Luba and Michael

--LIGerasimova 11:51, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Arbitration Committee case opening

An arbitration case involving you has been accepted by the Arbitration Committee. Please bring evidence to Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Baku Ibne et. al./Evidence. Thank you. -- Grunt   ҈  21:44, 2005 Mar 4 (UTC)


Dear Grun:


I said it before, and I say it now:


I am not going to deal with this uneducated and uncivilized user any more. I don't care about him and his Turkic problems. Wikipedia is no longer my favorite site (thanks to him). If I need information, I would rather visit some other trusted Internet sites, like Encyclopædia Britannica 11th Edition (1910-1911), Jewish Encyclopedia (1901-1906) or Catholic Encyclopedia, but not Wikipedia, which contains obscure and undeserving trust articles, written or edited by persons like User:Tabib.


As far as mediation/arbitration process(es), let him write in his articles whatever he wants to write. From his Turkic point of view, Turks invented first alphabet, they founded Troy, they wrote Bible, Jesus Christ, Karl Marks, William Shakespeare and Friedrich Nietzsche were all Turks, and even Wikipedia was developed by Turks. If you are not disturbed with quality of articles, written for Wikipedia, neither shall I. I am not going to argue with all his nonsense. Just because I respect myself and I value my time.


As far as I know, he has already requested dozens of mediation/arbitration requests with other users. If he continues, you will have to spend all your life, resolving his numerous complaints.


I am sorry, but you have to deal with this user without my help. I had enough of User:Tabib already! And I believe he is seriously sick and needs to visit his psychiatrist, but I am not a doctor. Sorry!


With best regards,
Rovoam 22:11, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Our friend seems on a rampage again! Don't let him get by!

Hysterical psychopath Tabib Huseynov, from Baku, is up to his old tricks again, must have broken loose from the local mental asylum, after a break of a few days. Whatch him tumbling from one fit to another, calling any voiced opposition "vandalism" and a case for "Arbcom". Infantile and spiteful ignoramus, hardly worth challenging any more. Look at Arbcom (!!) and some solidarity fetishists catering to this psycho's every whim! Who's Who, in the end? Kangooroo court! ̇ËÎÛ˜¯Ë ÔÓÊ·ÌË?--LIGerasimova 21:05, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Rovoam

Rovoam, you could have presented your cases against Tabib instead of slanders. It is obvious that Tabib does use propaganda materials such as comment likes "Gregorization" copied from the Azeris foreign ministry publications, or excluding Red Kurdistan etc. You could have presented your cases, why you did ignore doing so? It is obvious that Tabib is using Wikipedia as an extention of his propaganda website. Fadix 23:33, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)

No doubt about it, but what we could possibly achieve even if we win arbitration dispute in Wikipedia? This is the nature of the Internet: everybody can publish anything he/she wants and noone can stop him/her from doing so, not even Wikipedia Admins.
Let’s assume for the moment that we won, and User:Tabib is banned from Wikipedia forever. His next step would be to start over again, registering a new user name and using different IP (since he is posting from Azerbaijan, most likely he has regular dial-up connection, with dynamic IP addresses). And everything would start again...
By the way, could you please check something for me? I suspect that User:Tabib has created a faked Armenian user, User:Aramgutang. If you speak Armenian language could you please check if this User:Aramgutang can also speak Armenian? I cannot do this myself as I am not Armenian and I don’t speak Armenian. And I doubt that he is really Armenian, as he usually takes Tabib's point of view...
Regards, Rovoam 00:41, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Talk:Nagorno-Karabakh

Hi. Please stop vandalising Talk:Nagorno-Karabakh; this page should be used for discussion, not for your preferred version of an article. If you continue, you may end up blocked from further editing. — Dan | Talk 23:26, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Please stop replacing the talk at Talk:Nagorno-Karabakh with your preferred version of the article. This is an abuse of the talk page, and can't continue. If you want to work on your version, please put it at a user subpage, such as User:Rovoam/Nagorno-Karabakh. Thanks, Jwrosenzweig 23:27, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This is your last warning. If you vandalize another page with your version of this article, you will be blocked. — Dan | Talk 23:44, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. — Dan | Talk 23:49, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Nagorno-Karabakh

I suggest myself as a candidate to mediate the article. I already made my initial assesments. --Cool Cat My Talk 08:16, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Arbitration case - final decision

A decision has been reached in the arbitration case relating to you. For an unhelpful amount of revert warring on a wide range of articles you are limited to one revert per twenty-four hour period on all articles. You are also placed on a personal attack parole which means that any admin may ban you for up to one week if you should make any personal attacks. Please see Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Baku Ibne, et al.#Final decision for further details and the full decision. -- sannse (talk) 18:07, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] W is for Wanker?

Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship#Weyes

No doubt.--LastExitToBrooklin 21:48, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Causa Rovoam

copy of my recent message to Rhobite : Hi Rhobite, I noticed a minute deescalation effort on your part , with respect to Rovoam (Wikipedia List of Banned USERS). Having followed the revert ("World-") war Rovoam is engaged in, due to the rallying by Tabib of helpful and goodmeaning Admins, it is dawning on me that this has turned to some sort of continuous POGROM, in which any voice challenging Tabib is being assassinated upon sight. As someone fairly well acquainted with quite a number of issues in this context, I wish it were brought to the general attention, that Rovoam edits, or those of his suspected socks, tend to make a PERPLEXING lot of sense! It would appear a shame if this escalating character assassination were to be allowed to continue on WIKIPEDIA (our "lifeblood"). Let us all help bringing about a sensible solution, including the invitation of the scholarly learned intellectual Rovoam aka Andrew Kirsanov to a mutual table!! I do not mean to pester you with this ADDITIONAL honorable chore (I know, you are literally buried in incessant contributive work) but I gather YOU could wield some prudent influence in this quagmire of libel, aggression and POV pushing. Sincerely --Deli-Eshek 18:23, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] I am growing increasingly ashamed of the despicable fanatical conduct of some AZERBAIJANI compatriots!!!!

(Copied and pasted from AZERBAIJANIS) Would the Azerbaijani person, who is lecturing everybody on his blatant P O V , while calling any aposthates from his opinion "vandals" or socks (sic), quit his shameful conduct!? He increasingly sheds (very) bad light on honest and sincere Azerbaijani folks, who are not guided by political kaders in Baku (or receive kickbacks for spreading propaganda).--Deli-Eshek 19:31, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging Image:Bigmap.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Bigmap.JPG. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. -- Carnildo 10:02, 4 February 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Image Tagging Image:Armeniamap1907.jpg

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Armeniamap1907.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. SteinbDJ 19:12, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] WHat can I do for you?

Tell what the problem is?

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Lachin.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Lachin.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 15:38, 26 November 2006 (UTC)