User talk:Roswell native
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, Roswell native, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! hydnjo talk 05:21, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Henry F. Schaefer, III
I'm not sure I agree with your change of stub. The point of the stub is to attract people to work on the article to expand it and in this case I think we want to throw the net wider than UGA. I spent 5 months with Fritz in 1990. --Bduke 08:49, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
I believe your arguments about the copyright issue were disingenuous. Please revert back to the form I left it as and wikify it as you see fit. The article about a scientist should really be about his accomplishments and not a forum for some sort of religious argument. I hope you agree. --Mathchem271828
(Note: Adding my reply originally placed on Mathchem271828's talk page as that user has chosen to delete them. --Roswell native 16:25, 9 December 2006 (UTC))
- Mathchem, please assume good faith on my part, I certainly assume that of you. Disingenuous could easily be construed as a fancy word for lying - but I don't think that is what you meant. As I just stated on Talk:Henry F. Schaefer, III, the scientific info absolutely belongs on that page (and should be the main focus of the article IMO - although other previous editors may disagree), but it should not be a cut and paste from the site.
- My concerns are these:
- The material does have a copyright (which I think is probably not the case, but that's not sufficient reason to include it): Verbatim from Wikipedia:Copyright problems - "What's copyrighted? Copyright exists automatically upon creation in a tangible form. An author does not need to apply for or even claim copyright for a copyright to exist. Only an explicit statement that the material is in the public domain, licensed with the GFDL, or is otherwise compatible with the GFDL, makes material reusable under current policy, unless it is inherently in the public domain due to age or source."
- I would like to prevent another edit war as that has already occurred for the non-scientific material on Fritz's wikipedia entry. Some editors that are very new to Wikipedia have accidentally (and innocently because of this inexperience IMO) stirred the flames so I'm erring on the cautious side of Wikipedia policy to insure folks stay cool.
- Cutting and pasting goes against Wikipedia's guideline to not include copies of primary sources
- Apologies for being so long-winded. I took a quick look at your edit history. Based on that I think you can be a very helpful source in making the HFS article a good one. I hope you choose to participate in that process. If you decide to revert that change back, feel free to do so knowing I won't revert it back in the near future, but I suspect other editors may do so, and I think a good bit of that info does need to be edited out (e.g. work locations of previous HFS students). Cheers. --Roswell native 06:57, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] UGA template
First, I saw the stub, and I like it. I'm glad you made it happen, and I think it looks fine. Borrowing the userbox template (which is just modified from similar boxes!) is totally cool with me. I didn't know you had to register either, but thanks for taking care of that -- hopefully it will make some articles better.
Also, I think the template is a great idea, and when I get a chance I'll see if there are any changes that need to be made. But I think it's a really good start to tie all those articles together. Nice job, and thanks for keeping me in the loop! --SuperNova |T|C| 03:47, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] About Centennial High School
Hi. I don't really know who to send this to, so i found you on the edit list for Centennial High School in Roswell, GA. I am a student there, and I check that page frequently for vandalism and every so often there are the same edits made by the same person, Kitra101. These edits are blatant lies and make no sense. I revert the page every time, but they keep coming back. Unfortunately, they don't have a user page that I can communicate with them on. Can you help me with this issue? Thanks. Lbr123 21:37, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] College Football Project
Hello, I noticed that you have edited a College football related article. You may be interested to know that there is a college football WikiProject which you can join if you like. We would love to have you! --Mecu 01:59, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Tucker
Krakow's Georgia Place Names has it named after the Mercer/UGA Tucker http://www.kenkrakow.com/gpn/t.pdf I don't have a horse in this race, so whatever --Jolomo 13:53, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
- Sounds like a plan. --Jolomo 02:02, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] List of Georgia county name etymologies
Hi! I have noted your work on Georgia counties. Very nice work! After discovering the List of Georgia counties, I was inspired to begin work on a county name etymology for Georgia. I just discovered this list today, but I think that my list can improve on this. I have been working on a subpage User:Ganymead/counties where I have added the information to a table and I'm currently sourcing the info as well as adding images of the county namesakes (where available). The point is really to bring this up to Featured List standard. Please take a look and see what you think. Thanks! *Exeunt* Ganymead | Dialogue? 17:49, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Your edit to Roswell, Georgia
Please read Wikipedia:Profanity. Thank you. --NE2 00:15, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
- The relevant sentence is "However, when quoting relevant material from external sources, rendering a quote as it was originally spoken/written trumps our style guidelines." --Doc Tropics Message in a bottle 00:16, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
I responded on my Talkpage since you posted there. Thanks for sharing your well-thought comments :) --Doc Tropics Message in a bottle 05:11, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] License tagging for Image:Charles herty.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Charles herty.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:07, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] You are welcome
You really do deserve the barnstar. Thanks for reading my additions and, more importantly, correcting the typos and other screw-ups that you see. Tlmclain 03:18, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 23:12, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] New categories/organization in Category:University of Georgia
Roswell native: Thank you for including me in the consideration of these new categories. My initial thought was to completely defer to you because you have done so much work in the UGA space that you are obviously more in touch with the issues than I am (my contributions have been predominately related only to sports). However, since you asked for my views, I will give them to you – for whatever they are worth. If you really want to pursue an oganized catorization of all things Georgia, this hierarchy would be one way to do it:
Subcategories for University of Georgia
- University of Georgia people
- University of Georgia alumni
- University of Georgia athletes
- Georgia Bulldogs coaches
- Georgia Bulldogs baseball coaches
- Georgia Bulldogs basketball coaches
- Georgia Bulldogs football coaches
- and so on
- Georgia Bulldogs players
- Georgia Bulldogs baseball players
- Georgia Bulldogs basketball players
- Georgia Bulldogs football players
- Georgia Bulldogs golfers
- and so on
- Georgia Bulldogs coaches
- University of Georgia faculty
- University of Georgia non-graduate attendees
- University of Georgia presidents
One additional issue to address with athletics is whether it is necessary or appropriate to distinquish between male and female atletics in common sports. That is already being done under basketball. If so, the above hierarchy would extend one more level. Basketball would look like this:
- University of Georgia people
- University of Georgia athletes
- Georgia Bulldogs coaches
- Georgia Bulldogs basketball coaches
- Georgia Bulldogs players
- Georgia Bulldogs basketball players
- Georgia Bulldogs coaches
- University of Georgia athletes
The current structure of University of Georgia basketball and Georgia Bulldogs football also highlights another issue - do players get listed as subcats of the team category and the athlete category or do we re-organize so that they appear in only one place?
It may be pre-mature to add some subcats at this time. For example, my perception is that there aren’t that many Georgia baseball players in Wikipedia at this time, so the subcat could be unpopulated or under-populated.
With respect to non-graduate attendees, I do wonder (i) whether there are enough people to warrant a subcat and (ii) whether the distinction is feasible. Particularly in the case of athletes, it may be difficult to determine who is a non-graduate attendee. Athlete bios don’t always focus on whether they actually graduated. In any event, you have a better feel for this
Some double-categorization may be inevitable, unless you tuck a subcat in more than one cat. With the hierarchy above, a football player would wind up in University of Georgia alumni and Georgia Bulldogs football players. Alternatively, you could make Georgia Bulldogs football players a subcat of both Georgia Bulldogs players and University of Georgia alumni and perhaps avoid double-categorization. However, I don’t mind double-categorization since part of the goal of categorization is to make it easy for users to browse through similar articles. In other words, since some may browse by alumni and some by player, double-categorization may be a good thing.
Finally, as if this isn’t already a big enough project, it may be a good idea to look at managing the various lists in existence (and any that are needed). In other words, how should the athlete listing List of University of Georgia people be managed vis-à-vis the list Georgia Bulldogs football#Former Notable Players and any list that might be created to list all former players.
You'll probably never ask me a question again. Tlmclain | Talk 14:24, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
- Roswell native: Thanks for the link to the alumni directory - I probably was notified of it, but blew it off. It is handy.--Tlmclain | Talk 16:36, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image help
Roswell native - The images that I loaded today on some UGA football players have been tagged as having possible fair use problems. Today was the first time I ever used the fair use rationale. If you can help me fix these images, it would be a great help. The discussion is here. Thanks.--Tlmclain | Talk 18:36, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Reps
House websites say that Linder served in the 11th District until Jan. 2003, and then his distrct was renumbered as the 7th for the next Congress. Gringley became the new rep. of the 11th district in Jan. 2003. Hope this straightens it out. VitaleBaby 03:32, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Edits to Georgia
Roswell native: In connection with your edits to create a table at Georgia for the micropolitian area, I stayed away from editing those earlier because 1) I don't think the same references work for the metro and mocro areas and 2) I really don't think we need to be including this information in the main article on Georgia. On top of that, based upon edits made by Polaron, I think the listed references may be wrong anyway (see my comments here. In other words, the answer to the question in your edit summary (there are the same aren't they?) is probably no.--Tlmclain | Talk 03:51, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- No harm whatsoever. I had just been trying to figure out whether to go ahead and delete the micros when along came Polaron to cause me to realize that the metro table is probably screwed up, too. I really hate removing material that someone has devoted effort to create. However, if you ever had any doubt that the article on Georgia needs a lot of work, take a look at Minnesota, a state article that just reached FA status. Anyway, I've had enough fun for the day. I'll ge back to this later in the week.--Tlmclain | Talk 04:27, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] UGA Category hierarchy
Roswell Native: Good thoughts on the categorization of UGA people. While we’re at it, we might as well look at the entire category structure for UGA (good news – I saw no other changes that are needed at this time). Here is the entire hierarchy as I see it (I made a few minor changes to what you had done on my talk page, but failed to highlight them):
Category:University of Georgia
- Category: University of Georgia athletic teams
- Category:Georgia Bulldogs baseball
- Category:Georgia Bulldogs men’s basketball
- Category:Georgia Lady Bulldogs basketball
- Category:Georgia Bulldogs football
- Category:University of Georgia campus
- Category:Colleges and schools of the University of Georgia
- Category:University of Georgia people
- Category:University of Georgia alumni
- Category:University of Georgia athletics personnel
- Category:Georgia Bulldogs athletes
- Category:Georgia Bulldogs baseball players (also a subcat under Georgia Bulldogs baseball)
- Category:Georgia Bulldogs men’s basketball players(also a subcat under Georgia Bulldogs men’s basketball)
- Category:Georgia Lady Bulldogs basketball players(also a subcat under Georgia Lady Bulldogs basketball)
- Category:Georgia Bulldogs football players(also a subcat under Georgia Bulldogs football)
- Category:Georgia Bulldogs men's golfers
- Category:Georgia Lady Bulldogs golfers
- Category:Georgia Bulldogs coaches
- Category:Georgia Bulldogs baseball coaches(also a subcat under Georgia Bulldogs baseball)
- Category:Georgia Bulldogs men’s basketball coaches (mens)(also a subcat under Georgia Bulldogs men’s basketball)
- Category: Category: Georgia Lady Bulldogs basketball coaches(also a subcat under Georgia Lady Bulldogs basketball)
- Category:Georgia Bulldogs football coaches(also a subcat under Georgia Bulldogs football)
- Category:Georgia Bulldogs athletes
- Category:University of Georgia faculty, staff and administration
- Category:University of Georgia faculty
- Category:University of Georgia presidents
- Category:University of Georgia trustees
Some of the cats may not need to be created yet because there's not much to put in them. Once we are satisfied with the hierarchy structure, I think the structure should be posted at the top of the UGA talk page in a box so that other editors can (1) understand how to categorize articles and (2) understand the format to be used in connection with the creation of new UGA categories.
Of course, the foregoing structure will require some category clean-up. Here’s what I have noted so far:
- Rename Category:Georgia Bulldogs basketball coaches to Category:Georgia Bulldogs men’s basketball coaches
- Rename Category:Georgia Bulldogs basketball players to Category:Georgia Bulldogs men’s basketball players
- Rename Category:Georgia Bulldogs basketball to Category:Georgia Bulldogs men’s basketball
- Delete Category:University of Georgia basketball - I don't think we need this anymore.
What do you think? We can probably go live with this pretty soon. --Tlmclain | Talk 14:30, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Going Live
I was actually thinking about how to get this underway this before I got your message. For the "box" on the talk page, I am now thinking that we may want to create a template that we can add to the talk pages of all significant UGA articles and at the top of the categories themselves. If the hierarchy information shows up in several places, then maybe we won't be spending all of our time re-categorizing new articles. In any event, lets get the template ready, put it out there and then start creating the new categories and start re-categorizing articles. I'll start on the template on my sandbox and let you know when there is something to review.--Tlmclain | Talk 13:46, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- A first pass at the template is ready for your review and editing help on my sandbox. You will quickly notice that I used your UGAtemplate as a go-by and messed it up. Please do whatever you can to improve it and feel free to edit it however you deem best. --Tlmclain | Talk 14:38, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- I am also wondering when you are going to start using your UGAtemplate - I think it looks great. --Tlmclain | Talk 20:16, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Schaefer
In that case, it would be helpful if you could get the editors who just showed up to understand that. Multiple attempts on the user talk page have resulted in no replies. 3RR warnings have already been given. JoshuaZ 17:36, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- Just put the same notice on one of the editor's talk page. If that's unsuccessful, then the editors in violation need to be reported. I thought the 3RR policy should be clearly stated on the Schaefer talk page as well since the page seems to be drawing more attention.--Roswell native 17:48, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Georgia (US State)
sorry about the this user is from georgia thing i meant to post it in my user page, again sorry.--Good ol' boys 20:29, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Wikiproject
I haven't wandered into a Wikiproject yet so I really don't know much about what's involved. If you think that is the next step, I'll help - but you will probably have to tell me what to do. --Tlmclain | Talk 21:28, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- There is something strange going on with my talk page, but I don't think you did it. The [edit] above a section works for two sections below, instead of the one directly below. . . . As to your suggestion, if you will fix my template for the category hierarchy, I say we create the template, post it on the UGA talk page and have at it. The reason I want to start with posting the template on the talk page is that it will help us (me) keep up with how it all fits together.--Tlmclain | Talk 04:05, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] New cats
After thinking about it last night, I decided that there was no reason to delay starting the work pending the creation of the Category hierarchy template - it may still be very handy to have complete when we request the handful of category renames and the deletion of that one category. In any event, I created a few of the new cats last night and just finished placing a few folks in the categories. Before doing much more, I thought it maight be good for you to look at the handful that I've done so far - I think it may be a representative sampling.--Tlmclain | Talk 22:18, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Template
Ok - I went ahaead and started Template:UGAcats, but it still has a few problems. The main problem is that I cannot get the right-hand border to line-up - I can't figure out how you got it to work on your template. By the way, I took out all of the future cats for now - its probably better to add them when we need them instead of filling the template with dead links. If you get it looking nice, go ahead and post it on the talk page for UGA.--Tlmclain | Talk 00:30, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
- You da man! Well done - it looks great. By the way, I have gone ahead and proposed the three cats that we identified for renaming and the one cat that we identified for deletion.
[edit] Approved for AWB!
Thank you for your recent application to use AutoWikiBrowser. I have approved your request and you should now be able to use the AWB application. Be sure to check every edit before you save it, and don't forget to check out the AWB Guide. You can get any help you need over on the AWB talk page. Feel free to contact me with any questions, Alphachimp 02:26, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] DYK
Thanks very much Roswell native for creating this interesting article which was nominated kindly by GeeJo. Feel free to self-nom in future, like the majority of entries. Keep up the great work! Blnguyen (bananabucket) 07:31, 13 December 2006 (UTC)