User talk:Rossinicholas

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Southern Virginia University

In general I think the copyedits you made to this article make for a more readable article so thanks. One request though, please preserve the references that are in articles (things between <ref> and </ref> marks or <ref name=myname/>) as these create the footnotes and provide verifiability of the information in the article. Thx --Trödel 13:04, 3 August 2006 (UTC) tions]]. 09:05, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for working to edit the page. There was however, a lot of pertinent content there that might have been left in the previous version. Your view of Southern Virginia University seems to be a bit dark. I may edit. I appreciate how you were able to cite so much of the content in the version you posted. :) Thanks :) Peter Bright 2006 Dec 2, 13:14

[edit] Elliot[t] Smith

I was just mocking those whose lives are adversely affected by such things. - Dudesleeper 12:28, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] ... speaking of Elliott Smith

So you took that photo of Smith and Chiba? You know/knew them or something? Just checking the picture really is yours to release into the public domain. Nice addition to the article anyways! - Phorque 18:00, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

OK, so it's a long story, but could you at least perhaps include the date the photo was taken, what you took it with, whether you scanned it from a print etc etc, just the relevant information, you know? Especially with the date though, because that would be good to put in the image caption in the Elliott Smith article. - Phorque 14:09, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Southern Virginia Univ

Hey, Trödel. Listen up. You know absolutely nothing about SVU. Do not delete what I worked on. Get the drift? Rossinicholas 08:00, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

This is a wiki, any language you insert into a document can be "edited or deleted mercilessly." The article you edited was well sourced, and you emptied it of all footnotes and cross-references and inserted material that is not verifiable. Please provide references then, or at least don't remove the references that are there. I requested above that you not delete the references in August, and tride to give instructions on how to do it; however, after 3 months you had not fixed the issue. So I restored it to a verifiable state. --Trödel 15:29, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Additionally, please do not make vague threats, as they can get you banned from Wikipedia. --Trödel 15:30, 29 November 2006 (UTC)