Talk:Ronan Bennett

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Crest of Belfast This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belfast, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the City of Belfast, Northern Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale.If you are a member of the project, please rate the article and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

Article Grading:
The article has not been rated for quality and/or importance yet. Please rate the article and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.


 

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ]

This article is full of POV problems, and a lack of citations.

1. "Critics hailed the novel", re The Catastrophist - citations please. 2. "Their sexual relationship is handled with great frankness, and their love appears very real" etc. This reads like a review, not an encyclopedia entry. 3. "There is considerable poignancy" etc, again re The Catastrophist. I would also question to amount of time and detail given to the plot of this one book. 4. "Havoc was also well-received in the press." There should be some citations for this. Links to reviews or something. 5. "Bennett was an uncredited co-author of Stolen Years" Again, citation please.

The whole thing could do with a robust re-writing. It read too much like a publisher's puff-piece at the moment.

--Wastekiller 18:12, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

The whole thing could do with a robust re-writing.
Go for it, dude. It's Wikipedia! --Peripatetic 21:01, 18 July 2006 (UTC)