Template talk:Romanian historical regions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

The colonisation of a region in 22 years does not make it a "Romanian historical region". If you don't wanna leave Dobruja alone, put norhern Dobruja as "such a region" but southern Dobruja is definitely not such. VMORO 20:35, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

what makes a region a "romanian historical region"? Anonimu 18:15, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

In reality Banat is not and never was part of Transylvania. It is a common error, but they are separate regions and Banat is not included in Transylvania. --Roamataa 21:06, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../r/o/m/Template_talk%7ERomanian_historical_regions_96f8.html"