Talk:ROH Pure Championship

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Unification

Is it definite that the pure title is now a thing of the past? Are we sure that Danielson isn't going to just hold both and defend them separately? Tromboneguy0186 21:21, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

If 2 titles are defended separately then I don't really think they should be considered unified. TJ Spyke 02:41, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Well, as per Wikipedia's own article on the topic, "unification" can still refer to this scenario, like when Kurt Angle, Jeff Jarrett, and D-Lo Brown unified the Intercontinental and European titles in the WWF. Tromboneguy0186 08:57, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

In both of the definitions for wrestling, the titles are merged into one title. With the 3 wrestlers you listed the IC/Euro titles were not unified into 1 title, they were still seperate titles and thus not unified. TJ Spyke 21:12, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

It's moot anyway, ROH has now come out and said there's only one singles title Tromboneguy0186 21:18, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

That's fine, they are just an indy fed and don't need more than 1 singles title. When/if they decide to try and become a major organization(which they will need a TV deal for) then I can see the need for more than 1 singles belt. TJ Spyke 21:22, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Here's the reference for the absorption of the title -

August 8th: The shocking announcement that there will only be one ROH singles title after this Saturday's Liverpool event has everyone talking. [1]

Tromboneguy0186 03:01, 15 August 2006 (UTC)