Talk:Robinow syndrome

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Robinow syndrome has been listed as a good article under the good-article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a review.

An entry from Robinow syndrome appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on 23 May 2006.

	This article is supported by the WikiProject on Medical genetics, which gives a central approach to Medical genetics and related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article Robinow syndrome, or visit the project page for more details on the projects.
GA	This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale.

	To-do list for Robinow syndrome:	edit - history - watch - refresh
	Strike through when completed Make redirects for all names the syndrome is "also known as" Images for autosomal dominant and recessive Possible additional Sections: Classification Diagnosis Treatment/Management Prognosis Prevention/Screening Epidemiology History Social impact See also External links See WP:MEDMOS for additional style suggestions

[edit] synonyms

Problem with many syndromes is that they are known under various synonyms, and listing them all in the beginning of the article may not be very attractive. In several articles (e.g. Adiposogenital Dystrophy), for lay-out reasons, I listed these under a separate header. Maybe this article would look better too with a separate "synonyms" section? --Steven Fruitsmaak 12:14, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

I went ahead and took out citing a source where each synonym came from, since there were really only two that encompassed them all. I'm not too sure about an entire section devoted to a list synonyms – I think that it's best to avoid long sections of list and go for prose if possible – but I hope clearing out the repeated references will make the lead a little less overbearing. — Rebelguys2 ^talk 18:16, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

I like the lists because, after all, it's a bit useless information in most cases. --Steven Fruitsmaak 20:22, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

I've broken it off into an additional paragraph at the end of the lead. What do you think? — Rebelguys2 ^talk 21:01, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Much better!!! --Steven Fruitsmaak 00:15, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] picture

I think it's a good article, but it would of course be better with a picture... pretty hard to get, however... --Steven Fruitsmaak 12:18, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Definitely. There are no free photos out there – and it's, like you said, obviously very difficult to find a patient to take a photo of given the rarity of this disorder. There's plenty of copyrighted choices at http://www.robinow.org, but I'm hesitant as to how to blindly choose one of the kids there for fair use. If we were to use a photo, If we were to take one from somewhere, and use it as fair use, I think it'd be best to take one of a journal. Patton (2002) and Afzal (2000) seem like good choices. — Rebelguys2 ^talk 18:16, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

I've uploaded a photo, Image:Robinowsyndrome.jpg, under a fair use rationale, and removed the requested photo tag. — Rebelguys2 ^talk 18:59, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

Now added a complete rationale to prevent User:OrphanBot from sticking {{norationale}} onto it. GeeJo ^(t)⁄_(c) • 20:05, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Mortality

In the chart, mortality is listed as 10% for the recessive inheritance, but I do not see any text as to how this translates into age at death, cause of fatalities, etc. I believe this would be something a family facing this situation could find especially useful. Jtmichcock