User talk:Ricnun

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Ricnun, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Brian 22:42, 6 July 2006 (UTC)btball

[edit] License tagging for Image:Test Card G Pye.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Test Card G Pye.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:06, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:14_9_on_4_3_.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:14_9_on_4_3_.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:18, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Phant1gfx.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Phant1gfx.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:06, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Phant1spc.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Phant1spc.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:23, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Voyager logo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Voyager logo.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:07, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Voyagerlogo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Voyagerlogo.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:54, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Flashing animated GIFs

I just wanted to let you know that I've been replacing your animated images in the ZX Spectrum graphic modes article with links. The reason for this is that I'm afraid they could cause seizures in people with photosensitive epilepsy. See the W3C's guidelines on this issue at this link. Just thought I'd let you know. --Fastfission 14:37, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

  • Good, fine for me, I didn't think about that... sorry if someone was affected :-( Thanks for fixing it. I just tried to simulate the interlace effects.

[edit] Shuttle Buran program

Hello. Thanks for your edits over at Shuttle Buran program and associated pages. Would you be able to provide references for the material you've added, please, so that it is verifiable? Thanks. Mike Peel 21:17, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

  • Shure, just didn't had the time. All the references are those present on the main Buran program page, and I'll try to sort it out. A major source is [1], but most of the data is on the Russian version, and I had to use a web translator... --Ricnun 22:38, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Galileo’s RTGs

I don’t believe for a second that this is a “whacky conspiracy theory”. Is it merely a coincidence that the black spot appeared at exactly the correct time one would expect it to were the story true? Is it so hard to believe that the pressure at 600km beneath the upper limits of Jupiter’s atmosphere could crush a plutonium 238 pellet to supercritical mass and initiate a chain reaction leading to a nuclear explosion? I don’t believe so and it’s only a link anyway. To prevent anymore hostility I won’t insert it again, but I think it was wholly unreasonable to remove the link with the note “no way is that going in here!” Miller 14:05, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

  • I didn't remove your link and didn't call it “whacky conspiracy theory” :-) I just stated that it's speculation and unverified. On an encyclopedia information must be refiable and not subject to discussion. Perhaps this sort of information belongs in a "Galileo speculation" article. Perhaps you can create that, I won't object. If TV series are on Wikipedia why not black spots on Jupiter ;-)?--Ricnun 14:16, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Sorry I appeared sulky there. I think it was someone else who did that not you. Looking at your user page it is probable that you know a lot more about Astronomy than I do, but I still think it’s an interesting story to be linked to – it isn’t actually mentioned in the body of the article. Oh well, if it’s left on the talk page people will still be able to read it and maybe even have a laugh at such an outrageous event occurring. Do you believe the story is true in the face of the evidence? It would certainly be funny if it were! Thanks. Miller 18:49, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
    • I keep an open mind, but I don't believe in anything that is on pages like "The Enterprise Mission". Not that I don't find it interesting, and some nice links to good raw data are sometimes present at the site, but it IS a conspiracy/speculation site. What they consider "evidence" look like coincidence and biased presentation of ocurrences to me ;-) Anyway, I think that all opinions have a place, even here, on an Encyclopedia. Just put them in the right category (talk page, speculation page, whatever). This should make everybody happy! For example, there's an article on ghosts :-) --Ricnun 21:40, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:14_9_on_4_3_.jpg

Source of this image? Taken from a copyrighted website? Screenshot? Such a high quality? How do you receive this channel? Tv or live stream? --Enlighter1 18:09, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

  • The source is on the image licensing information. It's a simple live capture of 768x576 PAL composite video from a satellite decoder. So it's kind of "half-digital" sourced image.--Ricnun 18:18, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Ap11-S69-31575HR.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ap11-S69-31575HR.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:05, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Testcard W.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Testcard W.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Wwagner 22:33, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 55 Cancri, Upsilon Andromedae images

Hey, thanks for putting those artworks into the articles, it's great to see people putting that kind of effort in. I'll just point out that the atmospheric circulation patterns on hot-Jupiters would look very different to those on outer system gas giants: here's the result of a simulation of HD 209458 b: [2]. In addition, there's been some work done on modelling extrasolar planet atmospheres [3]. For Upsilon Andromedae, the inner planet is predicted to have silicate clouds (the simulated spectrum corresponds to a bluish-green colour), the middle one is predicted to be cloudless (bluish colour) and the outer one is predicted to have water clouds (bright white clouds). For 55 Cancri, the inner gas giant is predicted to have large amounts of alkali metal absorption in the atmosphere (giving a very deep blue colour), the middle one I'd guess is a cloudless one like Upsilon Andromedae c (though this is not modelled in the paper), and the outer one is predicted to have water clouds. It might be a good idea to try and represent this in the art. Chaos syndrome 18:05, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

  • Well, I had those images on my personal page and just uploaded them here. Yes, I know about planet apearance, but I hope that in representing all the planets the same way, just changing size and distance from the star, I'll avoid speculation. Specially on a global system overview image. I'll try to do what you sugest for individual planets. I have celestia and can create the apropriate textures and use them there. But there's the question of actual planet size... I would be interesting to make images using a common scale, and compare all planets. For now I just have Celestia's information, and I don't know if it would be a good data souce for an Encyclopedia. I'll thing about this and contribute in the best way possible. Perhaps some generic "planet globes" for each planet category/apearance that we could put on infoboxes would be nice.Ricnun 12:11, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
    • While I see your point about speculation, there's also the problem that representing a Jupiter-like circulation on a hot Jupiter is definitely incorrect. I've seen several studies of the meteorology on hot Jupiters and they all come out with a pattern like the one I linked. In any case, provided the reasons for depicting a planet in a certain way are referenced to scientific papers (e.g. if we are going to use the five-class system for giant planets, make sure it's a case dealt with in that paper) or other such reliable sources, and it is made clear that these are artistic depictions based on those papers rather than actual images, I'd think that would be perfectly acceptable. As for planet radii, the transitsearch.org website has calculations based on a theoretical model (linked to from that site) which seems to reproduce Jupiter and most of the observed transiting planets quite well. Chaos syndrome 19:47, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Star wars amiga.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Star wars amiga.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:11, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Zx 256x192.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Zx 256x192.png. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 00:28, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:L1 g dolbyanalog.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:L1 g dolbyanalog.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Fritz Saalfeld (Talk) 13:29, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Cybernoid_amiga_gp.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Cybernoid_amiga_gp.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:29, 7 November 2006 (UTC)