Richard C. Casey
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Richard Conway Casey (b. 1933) is a United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York. He was nominated by President Bill Clinton on July 16, 1997 to a seat vacated by Charles S. Haight, Jr., confirmed by the Senate on October 21, and commissioned on October 24 of the same year. He gained national notoreity for his unusual personal circumstances — he is completely blind — and for his aggressive questioning during a 2004 trial considering the constitutionality of the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003.
Contents |
[edit] Early life
Casey was born in Ithaca, New York in 1933. He received a Bachelor of Science degree from the College of the Holy Cross in 1955, and a Bachelor of Laws degree from Georgetown University Law Center in 1958.[1] At Georgetown, Casey was particularly influenced by prominent lawyer Edward Bennett Williams.[2]
After law school, Casey worked as a legal investigator for the New York County District Attorney's office before becoming an Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York (1959-1963). From 1963 to 1964, he served as counsel for the Special Commission of the State of New York. From 1964 to his nomination in 1997, Casey worked in private practice with the New York City firm Brown & Wood. He also served in the United States Army (1958 and 1961-1962) and the National Guard of New York (1958-61).[3]
[edit] Blindness
In 1964, Casey was diagnosed with retinitis pigmentosa. His condition deteriorated into total blindness in 1987. His blindness does not seem to have slowed his career or personal ambition. At his Senate confirmation hearing, he expressed confidence in his ability to effectively judge the credibiliy of witnesses despite his loss of sight. He uses a guide dog in court, and he is assisted by computers that read documents aloud.[2]
A Catholic, Casey initially struggled with his blindness and was inspired by a pilgrimage to the Sanctuary of Our Lady of Lourdes. In 1999, Casey travelled to Rome to meet Pope John Paul II and accept the Blessed Hyacinth Cormier, O.P., Medal for "outstanding leadership in the promotion of Gospel Values in the field of justice and ethics".[4]
[edit] NAF v. Ashcroft
Casey presided over one of the three constitutional challenges to the 2003 Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act, National Abortion Federation v. Ashcroft.[5] A coalition led by NAF argued that the statute was unconstitutional under the Supreme Court's 2000 decision in Stenberg v. Carhart because the Act explicitly excluded a "health exception". The Bush administration argued that the courts should defer to a congressional finding of fact that this particular abortion procedure is never medically necessary to protect the health of a mother.
Casey had granted a temporary restraining order prohibiting enforcement of the Act on November 6, 2003, the day after it was signed into law. The trial began on March 29, 2004 and lasted 16 days.
Casey made headlines throughout the trial by his aggressive questioning. He repeatedly asked witnesses -- mostly doctors who perform abortions -- about the possibility that fetuses feel pain during abortion, and whether patients are truly informed of that possibility.[6] For example, the following is from an exchange during the redirect examination of Dr. Timothy Johnson:
THE COURT: When you describe the possibilities available to a woman do you describe in detail what the intact D&E or the partial birth abortion involves?
THE WITNESS: Since I don't do that procedure I wouldn't have described it.
THE COURT: Did you ever participate with another doctor describing it to a woman considering such an abortion?
THE WITNESS: Yes. And the description would be, I would think, descriptive of what was going to be, what was going to happen; the description.
THE COURT: Including sucking the brain out of the skull?
THE WITNESS: I don't think we would use those terms. I think we would probably use a term like 'decompression of the skull' or 'reducing the contents of the skull'.
THE COURT: Make it nice and palatable so that they wouldn't understand what it's all about?—Exchange between Judge Richard Casey and Dr. Timothy Johnson, NAF v. Ashcroft trial transcript, pp. 514-515.
On August 26, 2004, Casey entered a judgment[5] declaring the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act unconstitutional, in deference to Supreme Court precedent, but also condemning the procedure as "gruesome, brutal, barbaric and uncivilized". [7]
The Bush administration appealed to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, which affirmed the judgment.[8]
A further appeal of a similar version of this case, Gonzales v. Carhart, is now pending before the Supreme Court.
[edit] Notes
- ^ Biography of Richard Conway Casey from the Federal Judicial Center.
- ^ a b Judge in abortion trial overcomes personal obstacles in successful career from the Associated Press (April 11, 2004).
- ^ President Nominates Richard Conway Casey to the Federal Bench, original White House press release from the National Archives (July 16, 1997).
- ^ Casey '55 meets Holy Father and receives medal from Holy Cross Magazine (Fall 1999).
- ^ a b National Abortion Federation v. Ashcroft, 330 F. Supp. 2d 436 (S.D.N.Y. 2004), from FindLaw (August 26, 2004).
- ^ Judge Asks Doctor if Fetus Can Feel Pain, from the Associated Press (April 1, 2004).
- ^ Partial-Birth Abortion Law Rejected by Judge, from the Washington Post (August 27, 2004).
- ^ Courts turn aside abortion ban, from the Boston Globe (February 1, 2006).
