User talk:Riana dzasta/Archive 3
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is Riana's third talk page archive, dated 26-Sep-06 to 17-Oct-06. Please don't leave comments here; try this instead! |
||||||||||||||||||
[edit] ThanksThanks for the Balco page move. --Ageo020 (talk • contribs • count) 04:56, 26 September 2006 (UTC) [edit] Wikipedia:Esperanza/User Page AwardCongratulations, Riana dzasta, you have been nominated for the Esperanza User Page Contest! The judges have received the fifteen entries, and are ready to start judging. The judges will take a week to complete the judging process, and they will contact all the participants when the judging is done. Please drop by the contest page for contest updates and questions. Take care, and good luck! [edit] Re: Emilio EstevezI guess I can't catch them all, no matter how obvious they might be. :P That's the problem with going on vandal patrol late at night. --Coredesat talk! 08:35, 26 September 2006 (UTC) [edit] Balanced editsSorry for the relatively late reply. Actually, by "not in numbers" I meant that (I, at least, have noticed that) when a user's edits are "balanced", the numbers seem to be different, for example (main):3000 etc., etc. The numbers aren't "balanced" per se, but when you consider the edit count of most other Wikipedians (and not a metapedian like me), it has more edits in the actual encyclopædia part of the site than the project and user namespaces, and it looks normal to me. That having been said, and I nearly having forgotten what I replied to say, you're welcome. And also last thanks for your comment(s) in my review. Good day—and pardon if I didn't make any sense with that edit comment. :) — $PЯINGεrαgђ 18:58, 26 September 2006 (UTC) [edit] Nishkid64's RfA thanks
[edit] Leela DeviOh, yes, much better now. Many thanks and good work. illspirit|talk 12:39, 28 September 2006 (UTC) [edit] Hello and thank youHi Riana (such a pretty name!), thanks for your kind words on my talk page. Concerning my depression, I think that it wasn't just a reaction to medicine, but also the conjunction of different events at around the same time, both on and off wiki. As you said, something in me snapped. I hope that I can get better. BTW, I have seen your name before, on Springeragh's editor review if I'm not mistaken. I'm very pleased to meet you! Thanks again, --Kyoko 19:49, 28 September 2006 (UTC) [edit] Pralay (band)Thanks for your concern about the copyrighted material. All that content was written by someone else and I moved it over from Pralay. I felt it did not belong in Pralay so I created a new article with the same text. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Professorgupta (talk • contribs) 11:13, 29 September 2006 (UTC) [edit] Please reconsider your vote on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indus World SchoolThe consensus seems to be running towards Keep. I myself have withdrawn my nomination of the article for AFD as a result of recent changes to the article. Please re-read Indus World School and consider changing your vote to delete it. Thanx. --Richard 07:17, 29 September 2006 (UTC) [edit] Thanks for my editor review!And thank you for participating in my RFA. I don't want to change your vote, but I wanted to explain that I did not approach requesting adminship lightly. I knew that my two obstacles were length of service and my encyclopedia-building contributions, both of which are areas that will only improve with time. I was curious to see if there were any other objections and any other areas I could concentrate on, and, well, I figured what the heck. Adminship is no big deal, and neither is failing an RfA. If I fail, I'll keep contributing and try again later. I am really appreciating the feedback, though, from supports, neutrals, and opposes. It's what I wish my editor review had been. I'm grateful for the feedback from you and from everyone else. See you around! -- Merope Talk 16:35, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Many thanks for the barnstarRiana, many thanks for the very kind barnstar, I greatly appreciate it. Sorry I keep beating to you on the vandals :-) If you ever need any admin help, just let me know. Best, Gwernol 17:22, 29 September 2006 (UTC) [edit] User talk pageI glinched and then tweazled your format for my talk page... hope you don't mind! :-) — Editor at Large(speak) 01:24, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Good To See You Back!I was just curious where I could get more feedback on a few things. Good to see you back around! I thought you were on break. People Powered 02:45, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] RfA thanks
Hee hee hee! Blocking vandals actually makes me nervous. And I'm noticing that a lot of people list vandals on WP:AIV who don't really need a block. (Yet.) I feel really comfortable doing NPP (though it's a lot harder to leave warning messages for people), though. I'll probably sneak away from AIV until later. I'm supposed to be taking things slowly, after all. Have you ever given thought to being an administrator? -- Merope Talk 17:48, 6 October 2006 (UTC) [edit] ThanksThanks for the Birthday wish. Æon Insanity Now!EA! 14:19, 6 October 2006 (UTC) [edit] Thanks for the ThanksThanks for the thanks riana, we have to continue the fight against those bloody vandals, now im off to my user page, to guess what? fix some vandalism. :'( —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Fabrib (talk • contribs).
[edit] The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue V - October 2006The October 2006 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated delivery by grafikbot -- 20:20, 6 October 2006 (UTC) [edit] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harold BermanThere is some additional information at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harold Berman and Harold Berman. He is executive director of a different Jewish Federation. Eastmain (talk • contribs • count) 03:59, 7 October 2006 (UTC) [edit] bluecr0nHeh. Beat me to the punch on reporting that guy.--Vercalos 05:10, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Blucr0nIndefinetely blocked: Blucr0n (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log). Have a great day! Alphachimp 05:14, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Talk page vandalismI see you've been having some vandalism problems... Here's an early Thanksgiving present, to keep your mind off it. Bad things should never happen to good people, so here's to good things for an exceptional person! — Editor at Large(speak) 07:47, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks Riana dzasta
[edit] People listHey, I'm on my first people list! Cool! Thanks for adding me; but now you're making it look like I was bribing you. Oh, well. More can't hurt; here's a peach dessert 'cause you're just peachy :) — Editor at Large(speak) 04:45, 8 October 2006 (UTC) [edit] Re: WikimoodI cannot tell you what this means to me, Riana…I am without words. After a good ten (!) hours of sleep, I feel a little better, but it's depressing for me to see Wikipedians leaving right and left. I also had a big blow-up in real life a few weeks ago, and although it's subsided, if Wikimood were Realmood, it would still be Pretty tense, but at least I've got my wife in real life and you and Phaedriel on the wiki. <sighs> — $PЯINGεrαgђ 15:38, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] My RfA
[edit] Thank you for the reviewI wasn't sure about the signature policy, just fixed it now. Fixed some other things you mentioned too. AQu01rius (User | Talk | Websites) 16:13, 8 October 2006 (UTC) [edit] In many languages...
[edit] You're welcomeYou must have done something good. :) Just curious...Why did you move your message up? - Ganeshk (talk) 06:49, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Re: Barnstar for you!Thank you, although every review is priceless, and so yours are! As you said, I am just helping David's while he is busy. I know how bad one may feel when requesting a review and getting nothing back (the amount of times that happens in Peer Review is impressive). I just try to prevent that from happening in the Editor Review. Thanks again, and good luck! -- ReyBrujo 11:43, 9 October 2006 (UTC) [edit] Street FairOkay, time to bother you again. I noticed you added a comment on the article's talk page saying you couldn't believe you'd added a delete tag to it. Considering the fact that when you added the tag the article's content read "A street fair is a fair held on a street" it's quite understandable ;) [edit] WikiProject Disambiguation Talk RequestThis is a form message being sent to all WikiProject Disambiguation participants. I recently left a proposed banner idea on the WikiProject Disambiguation talk page and I would appreciate any input you could provide. Before it can be approved or denied, I would prefer a lot of feedback from multiple participants in the project. So if you have the time please join in the discussion to help improve the WikiProject. Keep up the good work in link repair and thanks for your time. Nehrams2020 21:40, 9 October 2006 (UTC) [edit] Re:Your RfAGlad I have your confidence. I hope to run again in the near future. - Mike | trick or treat 02:53, 10 October 2006 (UTC) [edit] RfA thanks from StuffOfInterest
[edit] Your thoughtsHey Riana! I thought you might be interested in something I put together for an RfA "guide": User:Junglecat/RfA Thoughts. I you have something you would like to add to it, feel free to edit it. I got "reprimanded" a while back because of my comments on a user's input to an RfA. This will hopefully help others understand my thoughts on the process. Cheers! JungleCat talk/contrib 17:08, 10 October 2006 (UTC) [edit] Re: Ok I willHello Riana, how very kind of you to come and say hello. Very thoughtful (and typically you) thankyou. I thought the last time we talked (about userboxes, if you recall) I got so grumpy that I'd put you off! Only five weeks (or less) now until the little one is born, so like you I'm on an enforced wikibreak. Maddening as I really enjoy it here. But I hope to have things sorted before the child arrives and at least do a little bit here on a regular basis. How's the studies going? :-) MoltonStPilgrim 08:56, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks for the message!Heya, nice to hear from you again. :) I've been trying to hang around and make at least a few edits every day, since I'd like to maintain some kind of activity, but I'm trying to avoid anything major. I've been seeing you around, though, sneaking around like you're up to no good... Thanks for taking at a look at my (as yet) incomplete essay, although it sounds like I really need to re-write it to account for every possible eventuality, given your little story. Woah. Looking through your contributions, would I be right to guess that 147.31.184.88 was the school IP in question? If that's the one, I'm not exactly sure what to think. In the end, I don't like to think in terms of drawing a line in this kind of situation. While it looks like the people using the IP had already learned their lesson, and appeared to quit vandalising immediately after they'd been warned properly, Adambiswanger1 was more-or-less justified in his actions. It would have been greatly preferable to just leave them be, and perhaps keep an eye on their contributions to make sure that nothing more happened (and I'll leave a quick note on Adam's talk page to that effect), but I don't suppose there was much actual harm done - if anything, it's certainly possible that other people using the school connection might have continued vandalising soon after, even if one (or a small group) had realised the problem. Oh, well. :\ -- Daveydweeb (chat/patch) 13:03, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
By the way, I stole yet more code from your talk page. Woo! :) Daveydweeb (chat/patch) 13:32, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Oh, god: That's a story I need to hear. It sounds, uh... cultural. :) And I'm glad to see you took my "sneaking" comment exactly was it was intended. I have this excellent mental image right now... :D —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Daveydweeb (talk • contribs). [edit] Re: RCPThanks for your message :-) I suppose ya gotta be nice even to the nasty vandals! (Love your user page btw) --Casper2k3 04:45, 12 October 2006 (UTC) [edit] In better spirits...You are just too much! :P Maybe I'll study your style of writing… ;D — $PЯINGεrαgђ 04:51, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] RfB With A Smile :)[edit] Miller-UreyThe user in question seems to have a history of nonsense vandalism and I thought the "rvv" would have been sufficient. But thanks for the tools; I'll try them out. Kablammo 12:29, 13 October 2006 (UTC) [edit] Belated Halo Birthday ThanksHi Riana. Thanks very much for the birthday wishes you sent (not to mention the lovley Pavlova (food). I've never had had one before!) And sorry that it took me song long to reply. Unexpected wikibreak :( Anyway, thank you very much. Thε Halo Θ 12:35, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Hey, It's People PoweredSome jerk called Freak of Nurture blanked my page and I can't edit. What's going on? Can you help? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 172.146.157.31 (talk • contribs).
[edit] Good MorningSo what's the good news? And who is this Karmafist person? If he or she is also active in New Hampshire politics, I might know them. It's a fairly small community —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 172.145.78.131 (talk • contribs).
[edit] A Smile, For YouAlphachimp has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing! Alphachimp 00:51, 16 October 2006 (UTC) [edit] Thank YouIn regards to this[1]. I'm heading to an event in Concord tonight, i'll ask around to see who this Andrew Sylvia person is. To be honest, if he had to deal with people like this Freakofnurture person, I don't blame him for being cross -- like freak's user page says: he's a dick. --People Powered(hopefully soon I can do the four tilde thing again)
[edit] User:People PoweredObviously, I don't have Checkuser or anything like that, so I don't have positive grounds for identification. It's a little hard to explain how I pegged him as being Karmafist, but if you look closely at his contribs, there's this rather odd blend of a supposed newbie (asking for help with his signature, etc.) who also has a remarkable interest in policy, particularly RfAs. That's very peculiar: my impression is that a rather small fraction of established Wikipedians participate in RfAs on so regular a basis. Combined with an interest in New Hampshire politics, and it seemed very likely that it was him in disguise. I'm not entirely familiar with the backstory either, so I may have some details wrong. I believe the real trouble started with the Pedophilia userbox wheel war and ensuing arbitration case, wherein Karmafist wheelwarred with Jimbo Wales, unblocked himself, and was personally desysopped by Jimbo. He applied for resysopping, but the RfA failed at about a 50-50 split. At some point (between the wheel war and RfA, I believe), he appears to have begun participating on the WikipediaReview message boards. On 8 Feb (two days after the arb case was opened), he started a manifesto calling for Wikipedia to establish a legislative system of government to establish policy and various other things. After the failed resysopping, he got more contumacious: misusing edit summaries, more or less abandoning article space to leave a customized welcome message directing new users to his manifesto, linking same in his signature, and so on. There was an arb case over the welcome messages. He got several short-term blocks on the terms of that, more or less abandoned article space for wikipolitics or chat, and finally got indef blocked. I don't know why Freakofnurture pulled the plug on him just now, but Karmafist has claimed to use sockpuppets several times in the past. (See his last request for unblocking, for instance.) The WR message boards seem to have been deleted, but at one point he (or someone using his name there) was promoting all sorts of nasty things according to this summary (which corresponds with my own memory of how things developed): suggesting people use sockpuppets to quietly insert defamatory material in biographies of living people to make bad press/lawsuits for Wikipedia, and boasting that he had one or more sockpuppets who would soon make adminship, which he could then use to reveal deleted material. It was this last that made me worried when he announced he was trying for adminship in December; I dropped an elliptical note to Mackensen to alert him, and Mackensen replied that other people already had their eye on him and there was no need to drop the hammer when he'd been behaving. I was fine with this — when he wasn't letting wikipolitics and, by his own admission, Asperger's get the better of him, Karmafist was a fine editor — but then this block came. Apparently it was preceded by some sort of IRC discussion, and MONGO recently created Andrew Sylvia (his RL identity), so there's probably things happening behind the scenes that I don't know about. I hope this gives a better picture of the situation. Choess 15:05, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Trivial questionI've been working in my head the way to pronounce the second word of your username, and can't figure it out! Is it too rude of me to ask? — $PЯINGεrαgђ 22:55, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
Also, before I knew, I was trying ot pronounce it Tsa' stə, and I was rolling the R! I thought it had something to do with India… <blush> — $PЯINGεrαgђ 04:04, 17 October 2006 (UTC) Hey! No interrupting me while I'm looking for barnstars! :P (This was originally going to have its own section.) — $PЯINGεrαgђ 04:10, 17 October 2006 (UTC) [edit] "I'd request a CheckUser, but I'm beginning to become less and less inclined to believe him, so I'll just let the wind die down."After I trusted you. After I thought we were friends. Wouldn't you check the history of an article about someone who others thought was you and wouldn't let you edit because of? Wouldn't you be angry if some bully just swooped in and said "you can't edit Wikipedia anymore", without any due process, with only circumstantial evidence, and just after I had make what I thought were friends and begun to feel proud of what I had done here? I've tried to think all day of a better word, but the only thing I can equate it with is rape. I can't imagine how sexual rape must feel, but I now know how the rape of an identity feels, and if the traditional term of rape is anything like this one, I would never wish it upon anyone, even bastards like Freaknurture. I read a little bit about Karmafist's case, and apparently his only crime was standing up to a bully similiar to the one that came down on me; the only difference was that the bully he saw was Jimbo Wales, and nobody else had the courage to stand up to him. I was unable to make it to Concord tonight, but i'm sure if I keep on asking around, i'll meet him eventually, and I don't blame him for the way he feels. You sicken me. I find the actions of dispicable people like Freakofnurture to be detestable, but at least he's honest in the fact that he is a sociopath. You, and by association, Esperanza, feign kindness and give out smiley faces and cupcakes and flowery kind words when it's convenient; but when someone truly needs kindness, when someone has been abandoned despite their love for this project and everyone shows them disdain, you don't have the courage to show that kindness that you claim to be dedicated to. You're a coward, and I have no patience for cowards, particularly in regards the rule of justice here, which seems to be an angry mob of villagers with torches and pitchforks. I took back the nice things I said about you above in regards to the soup and soda a few days ago. Lastly, I will haunt you and everyone you know for as long as you use this website. Whether it is by my hands or by another person from across the world, everytime you see someone try to harm this website, a piece of me will be there, because i'd rather see this website harmed to the point where it could no longer function than have someone enjoy something as much as this and trust people as much as I did with you only to see that joy and trust taken away in an instant. --People Powered.
Oh, dear Lord. You'll... haunt me? People Powered, I'm not happy with the way the situation has been treated, at all. I don't think you should have been blocked. I don't think your article should have been deleted (that one really gets to me). I am in the process of drafting a CheckUser request for you. Would you still like me to? All I'm saying is, the case against you is very good. Even if you are Karmafist or one of his associates, you've done no harm. I don't appreciate the 'pre-emptive strike' mentality. If you had done something wrong, I would still have been willing to fight for you. Seriously, if you still want help, let me know, you know where to find me. riana_dzasta 03:56, 17 October 2006 (UTC) [edit] RfA thanks
[edit] Keep the faithRiana, please don't be disheartened by this incident, or the bile spewed out above. It is unfortunate, but this comes with the territory – all of us will at some point encounter truly disruptive users on Wikipedia (which, by the way, I believe this user is). However, it is important to remember – no matter how hard they attempt to shake you – that Wikipedia is ultimately so much more, and that much more is largely good.--cj | talk 03:59, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
|