Talk:Rhymney Railway
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article should of course concern itself with the RR as it was; the note about it now being the Rhymney Line simply being an afternote. Peter Shearan 12:15, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
I have asked for a re-assessment of this article Peter Shearan 05:42, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Assessment, August 2006
Unfortunately, I think the Start class assessment is still appropriate for this article mainly because the article is almost completely made up of a few lists. Some other elements that could be added or improved include:
- There are two references that I can see listed in the article; these need to be more explicitly noted in a References section at the bottom of the article to follow the Wikipedia manual of style. The guidelines at Wikipedia:Citation templates show how to use many of the templates that have been developed for this purpose.
- There are no images, which includes maps.
- A few of the sections are one or two sentences long; these should either be combined with other sections as appropriate or expanded if enough information is available.
In general, it's best to follow the guidelines for Good and Featured articles. For examples of other articles that have been assessed at higher ratings, take a look at Category:B-Class rail transport articles. Slambo (Speak) 13:27, 21 August 2006 (UTC)