User talk:ReverendG

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive

Contents 1 Cool, up to 1,535,390 2 ... 3 Hey good news 4 Unexplained message 5 Dang it! 6 I am not really sure 7 Re: page blanking 8 Test 9 Are you my new Wikidaddy? 10 Really 11 Thank you 12 Hey Rev 13 I created my first article! 14 My very own Fisher-Price barnstar! 15 Master P/Foo12

[edit] Cool, up to 1,535,390

But this encyclopedia isn't writing itself. Get to work and quit wasting time on this stupid fucking talk page!

[edit] ...

Yesterday upon the stair

I met a man who wasn't there

He wasn't there again today

I wish that man would go away.

[edit] Hey good news

I support the dont-give-a-fuckism. also i did my second edit (not to big though) thanks for your help (your adoptee) --"P-Machine" 05:30, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Unexplained message

Language change? 147.197.251.136 16:18, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Dang it!

Adopt me! Shit! NinaEliza 05:51, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

But even if I can't, then I think I'll (kindly, because he's been very kind to me) let him go. He's only on Wikipedia every few days. I'm sure he's very knowledgable and couple help me with anything I wanted, you and I are on at almost the same time almost every night.

That means I could go to you for more immediate help for practical things. I'm not saying I expect an immediate response, but I can't wait, like two days - three days for an answer.

I've got things I want to do, like write an article for the parent organization of the non-profit I direct (Compeer International), expand the article on NAMI (which looks like it was written by Ely Lilly), make a taxobox, do the articles in my suggestbot, and the list goes on.

The technical tutorials are all written in Mandarin. I don't need, like, freaky-crazy help - just some really straightfoward questions answered.

Plus, I like the cut of your jib, sailor;). So whatta you say?NinaEliza 06:56, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] I am not really sure

I dunno if you can really have two adoptees so for you can have her i am getting off your adoption thanks for everything--"P-Machine" 06:53, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Please don't be offended, P. I only asked because I know other editors have taken on two or more adoptees. It's cool. But I didn't want to cause a ruckus - it started out as a joke, but the more I thought about it, the more sense it made. That's all. Are we cool?NinaEliza 07:01, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

We cool is just i do not want to get this guy in truble (i do not know much) --"P-Machine" 07:07, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Re: page blanking

Sorry, I don't know what happened, might be wikipedia that bugged, my browser that bugged, if not, I guess I must have done a mistake somehow. The page blanking was an not an act of vandalism, it was an mistake/accident somewhere. The real intentional edit, is the edit after your revert. -- Frap 23:50, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Test

==Do Not Remove Warnings== {{subst:wr}} ReverendG 01:11, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

I wondered what that would do, apparently nothing. ReverendG 01:12, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Sweet. Dfrg.msc ^{1 . 2 . Editor Review} 06:46, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Are you my new Wikidaddy?

Me too. I'll be home in about an hour and half (the work never ends, I just stop occasionally) and we can start.

And remember, I'll never call you Daddy. You're just here to hold my Mommy's drinks;).NinaEliza 01:41, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Really

cause i aint know thats why you adopted me in the first place —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Foo12 (talk • contribs) 04:47, 3 December 2006 (UTC).

[edit] Thank you

ReverendG, thank you so much for your review, I really appreciate your sentiments. Thanks again, Dfrg.msc ^{1 . 2 . Editor Review} 06:49, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hey Rev

I'm sorry I haven't talked to you in a bit. I should have done what I said I was going to do instead of what I did. I royally fucked up on pretty much all fronts. I lost my cool in this thing I've been involved in and the shit is totally going to hit the fan tomorrow (or maybe tonight, I'm going to bed).

I just can't do what I wanted to do with this whole arbitration thing in limbo. All the stuff that's going on in relation to it is simply freaking me out. I know I'm a good writer, I know I can make it here. I've got to back away and get some perspective until this whole thing blows over.

I'm in the process of completely re-organizing my non-profit. You wouldn't believe the stress and the workload (but I love it and it will settle down in a month or two). I actually came to Wikipedia to de-stress. So far, it ain't workin'.

Then today, after a particularly difficult stint at work, I came home to my watchlist and just lost it. I didn't even read half the stuff I was commenting on, I was so freaked out.

I'm not asking for help, or even much of a response, I just needed to get it out. You've pretty much said all you need to say, and I keep my cudgel close. Tomorrow (or two weeks from now), I'll ask you about taxoboxes. NinaEliza 09:46, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] I created my first article!

Hi Rev,

So a lot has happened since I wrote the above, and I see things a lot more clearly. The RFarb is over now, and I'm doing alright on all fronts. I'm not usually like that, I just sorta...whatever.

The article is New York Manumission Society. It's a stubby-stub, but I'm going to keep working on it. It's not that there isn't enough information, it's that there's too much. It's crazy weird that there's no article on this.

I've also done a lot of work on James McCune Smith, but there's a lot more to go there (I'm responsible for all of the red links - shit). Check them out!

NinaEliza 04:48, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] My very own Fisher-Price barnstar!

Thanks! It is both groovy and...another good thing I can't think of right now. So, New York Manumission Society - can you figure out what wrong with the fucking third reference? I hate that third reference right now...NinaEliza 02:43, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Never mind - I FIX IT BY MYSEWLF!NinaEliza 02:47, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Master P/Foo12

So Foo and I had a chat last night. Apparently, he then creates a sock called NinaEliza, vandalizes my talk page with it, then gets himself blocked. Here's the really weird thing: He uses the sock (or maybe not, but it's the same ip, so isn't that a sock? to tell me what a fucking bitch I am for talking to Foo. I can't even wrap my brain around it. Is that why you got vandalbot, because of him? I'm getting that, man. It's one thing to be trusting, it's another thing to be a doormat.

All the stuff I'm working on right now is so cool. I'm...happy. TTFNNinaEliza 04:49, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

First of it all the person was the same that vandilized me using the accounts Adopter and some other ones (i cant remember) He has vandilized me even using my own ip address. (by the way this is the second time i got blocked for it) i only vandilized once along time ago check it in my ip address. but if you want to accuse me of sock puppeting thats fine--"P-Machine" 06:54, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Yep, that's about the size of it. P got blocked by accident. Sorry again, P.NinaEliza 07:01, 13 December 2006 (UTC)