Talk:Reverse mortgage
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Most of this seems to be lifted straight from the "Reverse Mortgage Fact Sheet" linked in the External Links section
Contents |
[edit] possible links
OK. Directions under "external links" are to propose new external links here. Here are two for consideration:
1. Current and Historic Reverse Mortgage Rates
You may be interested to know that the National Reverse Mortgage Lender (NRMLA) site website also provides similar information in static format (i.e not searchable or interactive). However, they restrict access to "members only" NRMLA which seems to run counter to Wikipedia's mission.
I do believe these links add value to anyone searching for information on reverse mortgages.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sagetips (talk • contribs) 17:35, 20 October 2006.
- sorry.. those are adsense blogs, both are Links normally to be avoided and are against policy. However feel free to contribute content rather than links. see Hu12 17:49, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
So, do I understand that sites with adsense cannot be linked to by Wikipedia? If so, OK. Or, if by "adsense blogs" you mean the blog was created solely for purpose of ad sense, then you did not take much care in reviewing site.
By the way, is the "discussion" board a "one-person" (HU12) decides scenario or what?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sagetips (talk • contribs) 18:00, 20 October 2006.
- they are both... adsense sites and also blogs. The discussion board is open to all editors, i just happend to answer first. anyway, Wikipedia views these as Links normally to be avoided and would be considered Spam if added. Hu12 18:35, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
OK Thanks.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 207.74.51.248 (talk • contribs) 18:45, 20 October 2006 .
[edit] terminal condition
So what happens when the mortgator dies? Does the lender assume ownership of the property? 4.64.8.220 28 June 2005 17:32 (UTC)
- yes, the lender takes it, sells it, and regains the loaned money. --ʀ6ʍɑʏ89 01:31, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] commericial?
This sounds like a commercial you would see on TV. What are the draw backs of a reverse mortgage?
[edit] facts
I think that in some reverse mortgages, the home owner pays some money and in others he gets money back or pays nothing. previously, it said that he pays nothing. [1] can someone check this for accuracy? --ʀ6ʍɑʏ89 01:31, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
- The HUD article says: You don't make payments, because the loan is not due as long as the house is your principal residence. That is consistent with the NYT article that I added as a citation (see below), and with the other external links which I checked. I have removed the text that says the borrowers pay, since it is flatly contradicted by several sources and not supported by any that I could find. If someone does find a source, I'd be happy to see it added back with the source cited.
- I note that when I checked the Australian link, I found that the program seems VERY different from the U.S.. For example, it says If you can go on living in your home for a reasonably long period of time, you may be getting good value for money. However, if you die or have to go into aged care soon afterwards, you may have sold your home too cheaply compared with selling it on the market. That isn't true in the U.S.; when you get a reverse mortgage, you're NOT selling your house, you're borrowing against it. (In other words, the article would certainly benefit from a separate section on what "reverse mortgage" means in Australia.) John Broughton 04:52, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] citations
i think we need some in-article citing. User:John Broughton, can you add some citations for the major changes you made? --ʀ6ʍɑʏ89 01:31, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
- Actually, all the information I added is from one NYT article; I've added a link in the last section (external links) to that NYT article. Apologies for not doing this at the time of the rewrite.
- (The unusual URL is from this site, based on a comment here about creating permanent links, since after a week or so the NYT moves the article, shows only a small portion, and wants to charge for the rest.) John Broughton 04:54, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Germany
Experts study the American system. In the past, the German old age pensions were comparatively high. That is changing and with a growing group of aging poeple without children, the interest is also more and more given to install a comparable system. Until today, a "lebenslanges Wohnrecht" (lifelong right to resit) and "Leibrente" (special pension) are commun.
