Wikipedia talk:Requests for tail

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents 1 Hopeless 2 Teamwork 3 Merry Old Nat King Cole 4 Requests for autocunnilingus 5 Disappointed

[edit] Hopeless

This policy is never going to work out right. It's already devolving into a situation where everyone has a different idea of how it's supposed to work. We're just going to have to go back to the old system, where Jimbo just tells everyone who they should sleep with. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.2.81.170 (talk • contribs).

OK, I see where you're coming from, but you have to bear in mind that we have over 1.2 million registered users now. Jimbo has a porn empire to run, he just doesn't have time for this any more. There's a massive backlog that needs to be dealt with – Gurch 21:57, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Well, what the hell are all those stewards for then??? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.2.81.170 (talk • contribs).

Cabal use only. No, seriously, you don't want to know – Gurch 22:00, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

I'm sick of everyone vandalising this page. I'm going to revert this page back to my edit, and protect it, so you vandals can't ruin it again. -Nihon? 22:02, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

It looks better with pretty rainbow colours, plus they convey some impression of the page's purpose. So gah to that – Gurch 22:03, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Shut up you vandal, otherwise I'm putting an RfA on this. People like you shouldn't edit articles. --Nihon? 22:07, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

This isn't an article – Gurch 22:09, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Never said it was. -Nihon? 22:11, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

You don't have enough userboxen – Gurch 22:12, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

No Personal Attacks, No Threats, Keep it Civil. --Avillia 22:14, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

You're right, I need more userboxen. --Nihon? 22:16, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

You have a fever, and the only prescription is more userboxen – Gurch 22:21, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Teamwork

Listen, fellow nonvandals, I've already reverted this page three times today—I'm planning more for tomorrow. Those of you who care about maintaining Wikipedia's high standards, please take over for me. Let's work together to make this article a featured policy. Don't let Arrigo and his clique do anything. - Nat Krause^(Talk!) 22:20, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Sure, one revert coming up – Gurch 22:21, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

I waive my claim of 3RR against you. --Avillia 22:25, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Pah, that was only my second third fourth revert anyway – Gurch 22:27, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

I meant Krause. --Avillia 22:28, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Merry Old Nat King Cole

You make no sense. I see you embarrassing your mother every time you giggle. Why do you get all the pretty boys? ℬastique▼^parℓer♥^voir♑ 12:54, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Requests for autocunnilingus

So help me if that vandal drops the link again, I am going to farking block him beyond the grave. --Avillia 02:41, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

Farking block me? If you try that, I'll self-nom for admin and wheel-war with you so fast it'll make your head spin. We'll see who ends up blocked (hint: you). - Nat Krause^(Talk!) 02:51, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

Enginue! Nous sommes tres chaud maintenons! Pourquoi vous voulez ecrir les choses malcontente. Quelle deumage. ℬastique▼^parℓer♥^voir♑ 15:02, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Disappointed

Aww, this page is for sex? I was hoping it was going to be requests for literal tails. You know, to appease the furry contingent. Zetawoof^(ζ) 02:43, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Yes, I have been very disappointed with this page too. Fluffy tails are so cute and bushy and awwww. What we really need is a place where people can grant each others tails? So cute and fluffy and cooo-oool. *melts with cuteness* --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 23:25, 31 July 2006 (UTC)