Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/Open Tasks
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Update template based on Arbcom template. Edit/revise. -St|eve 23:42, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
| New | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| (w) | Silverback (t, c) | 31-10-2005 | |
| Ongoing | |||
| (w) | Zephram Stark (t, c) | 4-10-2005 | |
| Resolved | |||
| One Crown or Several? | 2-11-2005 | ||
| Failed | |||
| Plamegate | 2-11-2005 | ||
[edit] Notes
- Refer to issues in dispute, categorized under Wikipedia:Cases/Topic/Subtopic etc. On the case page, list the dispute by article, amended with user info. This way disputes are compiled and referentiable by issue, and show continuity in process.
I never really got the point of the incoming unassigned cases in the template. If we have time to put it in the template, we have time to assign it... though I guess you could always put it there and say up-for-grabs! but that hasn't been happening too much. Redwolf24 (talk) 00:55, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit] "For the Mediation Committee"
Does "For the Mediation Committee" mean that a current nominee for the Mediation Committee should not volunteer? Armedblowfish (talk|contribs) 22:59, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
- No, not at all. It means that the case has been accepted on behalf of the Mediation Committee. It is a way of designating that the acceptance is not in my own name, but in the name of the Committe; essentially, it marks the difference between my personal opinion and an official act of the committee. Essjay (Talk • Connect) 04:04, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
