Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Reddi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

[edit] Psuedoscience

It doesn't seem to have come up much in this RFC, but Reddi has been a long-term exponent of psuedo science (often related to Nikola Tesla). User:Tim Starling used to have a Reddi-watch... Just thought I'd mention that. William M. Connolley 16:51, 23 November 2005 (UTC).

WMC, your attempts to smear me (eg. personal attack) proves to me that you are a pseudoskeptic. JDR 17:08, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
Just as with User:Elerner, what a person believes isn't that important - what's important for the purposes of RfCs on user behavior is whether they are willing to accept consensus on what a "neutral" description is, even when it conflicts with their views. That is what both sides should be trying to prove in this RfC (otherwise it _is_ just a content dispute, or worse, a personal attack). I've already endorsed the view I consider to best reflect what happened. Your mileage may vary.--Christopher Thomas 17:17, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
Fair enough, thats why I put it on talk. Also see this [1] bad-faith edit by Reddi which mixes up the two. William M. Connolley 11:17, 24 November 2005 (UTC).
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../r/e/q/Wikipedia_talk%7ERequests_for_comment_Reddi_1b31.html"