Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Kosovo
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Users
First off, I have to make a note here - I have no hard feelings, and have no bad intentions of insulting anyone - but some of the people who have made statements are highly questionable - and thus their statements alone are highly questionable.
For example, Tonycdp has expressed a high lack of knowledge regarding the subject and overall shares a stand-alone stereotypics, without deeper knowledge of what percisely is Kosovo and its unique problem (refer to User_talk:Tonycdp)
Ilir_pz is now a brilliant user - but has expressed rather bad habits in the past (read: in the past) regarding the Kosovo article and the simmiliar subjects which led to banning, regardless of continous and severe edit-warring.
User:Asterion is a great user - but all in all, many can notice that despite that, in all of his firm neutrality, he is leaning towards the Serbian view (however, this doesn't mean that it's not that way because the Serbian view is correct).
Bormalagurski has changed - and although there is no doubt in there (I support him), he himself arguements that he has been behaving badly in the past. He was blocked eternally at the Serbian Wikipedia (where he was an administrator), and has repeatedly made severa Serb-POV on this wikipedia. I reckon to question this and mean no offense to the user in question - completly supporting his current aims.
User:Hipi Zhdripi - I would dismiss anything whatsoever this user states. He has been blocked indefinately many times - and then unblocked (upon my request, at times). I have given him the chance to repair - but he in truth never did that. Aside from highly racistic remarks of Serbs and Roma (people) (which include the statements that the Serb people should be exerminated), he threatened to kill my parents and uset the Northern Atlantic Treaty Organisatin's assistence to bomb my house. He has been vandalising many an article, and was (if not is) a clear example of an internet troll. I have tried a lot to influence him - but anything was backfired by personal attacks, him getting blocked, and then reappering under numerous sockpuppets (such as User:Hevnenon, or similiar) and "revenging".
Litany? Well, see under Asterion.
Me? I am neutral - as I have no intention to dispute the main subject of this issue (at least not anymore), but as I am the writer of all of the History of Kosovo, I could freely be classified under pro-Serbian - because of most of Kosovo's history is actually Serbian history (for this I have even been criticized by Hipi Zhdripi and some others like him).
Ferick has made some heavy remarks in the likehood of Hipi Zhdripi and has openly refused Wikipedia's policies and dismissed them. --HolyRomanEmperor 19:40, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] NOt a sockpuppet
I have been attacked being a sockpuppet of dardanv. I am not! I don't have anything to do with him. Semarforikuq 14:57, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
- And yet you have been identified by CheckUser as his sockpuppet and indef-blocked. ;) --PaxEquilibrium 19:35, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Appeal
I wish to lodge an appeal to the Arbitration Committee's decision. The decision brought a ban to Vezaso - regardless of the fact that User:Vezaso is indefinately banned as one of the many sockpuppets of User:Dardanv. --PaxEquilibrium 17:14, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- Yes that is the one year ban from editing Kosovo related articles, that probably should be Dardanv instead of Vezaso. --Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 17:24, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Sockpuppet
I recently found out that I've been accused of being a possible sockpuppet of User:Bormalagurski. Why haven't I been contacted earlier about this, and who is accusing me and why? I'm not a sockpuppet. --GOD OF JUSTICE 06:04, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
