Wikipedia:Requests for comment/WritersCramp

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).


Users should only edit one summary or view, other than to endorse.

Contents

[edit] Statement of the dispute

This is a summary written by users who dispute this user's conduct. Users signing other sections ("Response" or "Outside views") should not edit the "Statement of the dispute" section.

LaLa, WritersCramp, etc. has a long history of abusive edits and revert wars. They (singular they) have repeatedly reverted articles related to dog fighting, dog breeds, and Nazism, and attacked anyone who disagreed with their changes. They personally attack everyone they disagree with.

WritersCramp has been especially troublesome, adding unsourced pseudoscientific text to pages like homosexuality [1] and creating junk articles like gender issues and Category:Anti-Semitic people (which was cfded several times in a row & he recreated each time, but this time around managed to dig up enough votes to keep it). On WritersCramp's talk page, this user frequently deletes comments, calling them "homo spam". WC attempts to insult Exploding Boy, Elf with the names "Homo-Boy" and "Gay-Boy" in every discussion involving both users.

[edit] Evidence of disputed behavior

(Provide diffs. Links to entire articles aren't helpful unless the editor created the entire article. Edit histories also aren't helpful as they change as new edits are performed.)

  1. "Blow-Me" on User talk:LaLa
  2. "Gender issues" history
  3. Homophobic personal attacks deleted by Guanaco
  4. Uncivil remarks toward Exploding Boy on Talk:Annotated bibliography
  5. Vandalism of User:Ambi
  6. Personal attack vandalism of User:LaLa
  7. Bad-faith reversion of History of dog fighting breeds (and review previous 15 or so for similar reversions under different aliases)
  8. Misuse of edit summaries
  9. User Elf pg Skirting offense issue by starting "gay" issue
  10. Bully Kutta persistent nonconsensus reverts of stuff against WP policy
  11. Threatening language against User:Elf

[edit] Applicable policies

{list the policies that apply to the disputed conduct}

  1. Wikipedia:No personal attacks
  2. Wikipedia:Vandalism
  3. Wikipedia:Civility
  4. Wikipedia:Consensus

[edit] Evidence of trying and failing to resolve the dispute

(provide diffs and links)

  1. User talk:LaLa
  2. User talk:WritersCramp
  3. Talk:Gender issues
  4. Talk:Bully_Kutta (partial resolution)
  5. User talk:Elf-Masher, attempt to resolve & homophobic response to User:Fawcett5

[edit] Users certifying the basis for this dispute

{Users who tried and failed to resolve the dispute}

(sign with ~~~~)

  1. Guanaco 01:06, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
  2. Exploding Boy 17:19, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
  3. Elf | Talk 01:45, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Other users who endorse this summary

(sign with ~~~~)

  1. Jbamb 05:20, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
  2. Tom 17:06, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
  3. David | Talk 23:58, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
  4. And I'm not convinced his user page would meet the requirements of English law either; I certainly find it highly offensive. OwenBlacker 21:12, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
  5. Staxringold 14:22, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
  6. Trysha (talk) 16:47, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
  7. The Land 21:40, 24 January 2006 (UTC), and echo the comments about User:WritersCramp user page, which is highly offensive.
  8. Kasreyn 21:54, 13 July 2006 (UTC) clearly unacceptable behavior, also user is suspected as being a sock of User:SirIsaacBrock, in which guise he is also extremely disruptive and abuses fellow editors. Barring an unforeseen change of heart, I don't think there will be any way to deal with this editor in the end except an indefinite block.

[edit] Response

This is a summary written by the user whose conduct is disputed, or by other users who think that the dispute is unjustified and that the above summary is biased or incomplete. Users signing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Outside Views") should not edit the "Response" section.

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

Users who endorse this summary (sign with ~~~~):

[edit] Outside view

This is a summary written by users not directly involved with the dispute but who would like to add an outside view of the dispute. Users editing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Response") should not edit the "Outside Views" section, except to endorse an outside view.

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

Users who endorse this summary (sign with ~~~~):

[edit] Discussion

All signed comments and talk not related to an endorsement should be directed to this page's discussion page. Discussion should not be added below. Discussion should be posted on the talk page. Threaded replies to another user's vote, endorsement, evidence, response, or comment should be posted to the talk page.

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../r/e/q/Wikipedia%7ERequests_for_comment_WritersCramp_141d.html"