Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Language and linguistics
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Please note that this page is reserved for disputes in articles about language or linguistics, not policy disputes or language usage in unrelated articles.
- Talk:Jahbulon#Poll:_Tag_on_article - is the article encyclopedic and can the tag stating otherwise be removed? 04:13, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- Talk:Fork_in_the_road#Image_RFC Dispute about whether an image would improve the article 22:13, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
- Canadian English - an editor, RyanRP, has been making a series of edits ([1] [2] [3], of which I've reverted the first two) which strike me as being somewhat questionable. I'd like some input from an editor who has a good grasp of the history and influences of Canadian English, as I'm having to rely on what I can source from web references right now. Here's the relevant section on the talk page Thanks in advance for any assistance you can provide. 10:07, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
- Bajan - this article contains an exhaustingly long list of Barbados slang. The presence of the list in the article is contested for being a clear violation of Wp:not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_dictionary. Furthermore, the list keeps growing ad nauseam with a vast array of sexual slang/neologisms. Since the list removal has been reverted twice by two different users, objector kindly requests comments on this issue. 00:35, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
- Talk:Reorganization Agent of Korean History#Samguk Yusa, regarding the Chinese character 囯 on the left side of Image:Hwanin hwanguk.jpg. Could this character have been used in the 13th century original version of Samguk Yusa? 21:17, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
- Talk:Swedish language#"Dialect" Samples – A dispute over the definition of Swedish dialects. A user has raised objections about the validity of defining certain speech samples as genuine dialects which includes strong criticism of SweDia, a major research project on Swedish dialects. Counter-objections include concerns of original research and a lack of references, neutrality and civility from the objector. 06:49, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
- Not really a dispute, but since there's nothing else on this page, I'll just mention it: Irish phonology is up for peer review. Please leave comments at Wikipedia:Peer review/Irish phonology. 18:28, 4 November 2006 (UTC)