Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Hurricane Devon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In order to remain listed at Wikipedia:Requests for comment, at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this user and have failed. This must involve the same dispute with a single user, not different disputes or multiple users. The persons complaining must provide evidence of their efforts, and each of them must certify it by signing this page with ~~~~. If this does not happen within 48 hours of the creation of this dispute page (which was: 01:33, 4 May 2006 (UTC)), the page will be deleted. The current date and time is: 04:01, 16 December 2006 (UTC).

---

• Hurricane Devon (talk • contribs • logs)

---

Users should only edit one summary or view, other than to endorse.

Contents 1 Statement of the dispute 1.1 Description 1.2 Evidence of disputed behavior 1.3 Applicable policies and guidelines 1.4 Evidence of trying and failing to resolve the dispute 1.5 Users certifying the basis for this dispute 1.6 Other users who endorse this summary 2 Response 3 Outside view 4 Discussion

[edit] Statement of the dispute

This is a summary written by users who dispute this user's conduct. Users signing other sections ("Response" or "Outside views") should not edit the "Statement of the dispute" section.

[edit] Description

Hurricane Devon's behaviour is extremely problematic. He attacks and insults users he disagrees with, characterises their edits as vandalism, engages in revert wars, is a serial copyright violator and shows a complete unwillingness to listen when other editors try and point out problems. His behaviour has driven at least one editor away from Wikipedia. Worldtraveller 02:02, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Evidence of disputed behavior

(Provide diffs. Links to entire articles aren't helpful unless the editor created the entire article. Edit histories also aren't helpful as they change as new edits are performed.)

1. Attacking and insulting other users: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]
2. Groundless accusations of vandalism: [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]
3. Copyright violations: [11], [12]
4. Unwillingness to listen/ignoring other users: [13], [14]

[edit] Applicable policies and guidelines

{list the policies and guidelines that apply to the disputed conduct}

1. WP:CIVIL
2. Wikipedia:Copyright violations

[edit] Evidence of trying and failing to resolve the dispute

A string of editors have tried to get Hurricane Devon to see that his behaviour is a problem, all to no avail:

1. Copyright: [15], [16], [17]
2. Civility: [18], [19], [20], [21]

[edit] Users certifying the basis for this dispute

{Users who tried and failed to resolve the dispute}

1. Worldtraveller 02:02, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
2. Jyril 06:07, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
3. Chaos syndrome 13:24, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Other users who endorse this summary

1. Kafziel 17:21, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
2. Curps 06:57, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
3. joturner 04:38, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
4. Tdxiang--陈鼎翔 贡献 Chat with Tdxiang on IRC! 09:39, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
5. 132.205.45.148 04:40, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Response

This is a summary written by the user whose conduct is disputed, or by other users who think that the dispute is unjustified and that the above summary is biased or incomplete. Users signing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Outside Views") should not edit the "Response" section.

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

Users who endorse this summary:

[edit] Outside view

This is a summary written by users not directly involved with the dispute but who would like to add an outside view of the dispute. Users editing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Response") should not edit the "Outside Views" section, except to endorse an outside view.

I agree that Hurricane Devon's behavior has been quite inappropriate. Unfortunately, I did not notice this until a couple days ago. Of course an indefinite block is justified under policy, but I believe I can work with him to improve his behavior, to serve as a mentor of sorts. Let me spend some time with him. I will block him if necessary while we're discussing matters. Perhaps I am over-optimistic, but I always prefer to redirect behavior rather than block. — Knowledge Seeker দ 04:43, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

Incidentally, you may wish to see User:Hurricane Devon/Archive1, from when he was User:Acid, also going by "Battery Acid". He had a tumultuous start but I was eventually able to get through, at least for a time. I shall do my best. — Knowledge Seeker দ 09:31, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

Users who endorse this summary:

1. Knowledge Seeker দ 04:43, 5 May 2006 (UTC) Please note that I have blocked HD for now, so he won't be able to respond here. He's on Wikibreak; if he returns I will try working with him to help him understand these issues. — Knowledge Seeker দ 05:16, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
2. Sure, but good luck. NSLE _(T+C) at 09:23 UTC (2006-05-05)
3. Mentorship trumps block per AGF -M^ask 19:31, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Discussion

All signed comments and talk not related to an endorsement should be directed to this page's discussion page. Discussion should not be added below. Discussion should be posted on the talk page. Threaded replies to another user's vote, endorsement, evidence, response, or comment should be posted to the talk page.