Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Thomist

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

[edit] Thomist

Explanation of the request for CheckUser.

The Jay Robert Nash article keeps having POV statements inserted by User:Thomist and what is most likely Thomist's sockpuppet, User:Root50. This is not the first time User:Thomist has been faulted for inserting unsourced POV (see the discussion at Talk:Brett Kavanaugh for more). Now a third editor with a new account, User:Luna Santin, has becomed involved in the article. While there is a good chance User:Luna Santin is legit, it would be good to know that he/she isn't another sockpuppet and have proof that Thomist and Root50 are sockpuppets. Part of my concern over all of this is b/c the subject of this article, Jay Robert Nash, has threatened to sue Wikipedia and has a history of suing other publications that write about him. As a result, this article is a bad one to be involved in POV pushing using sockpuppets. It is this threat of legal action which, IMHO, raises this situation to where a checkuser is warranted. Many thanks.--Alabamaboy 17:22, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Unrelated. There isn't any evidence that any of these editors are tied to each other or anyone else. Essjay (Talk • Connect) 03:47, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made below, in a new section.


If you are creating a new request about this user, don't forget to edit this section and add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Thomist}}
The previous request (shown above), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (it will still appear here).
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../r/e/q/Wikipedia%7ERequests_for_checkuser_Case_Thomist_8aac.html"