Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Srkris

[edit] Srkris

• Srkris (talk • contribs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• 59.92.59.162 (talk • contribs • WHOIS • block user • block log • checkip)
• 59.92.50.88 (talk • contribs • WHOIS • block user • block log • checkip)
• 59.92.87.43 (talk • contribs • WHOIS • block user • block log • checkip)
• 59.92.83.63 (talk • contribs • WHOIS • block user • block log • checkip)
• 59.92.46.252 (talk • contribs • WHOIS • block user • block log • checkip)
• 59.92.63.37 (talk • contribs • WHOIS • block user • block log • checkip)

• BCEF:

User:Srkris, blocked for one week for violations of WP:COPY, WP:SPAM, WP:CIVIL, WP:AGF, etc has returned and has been editing anonymously. Parthi ^{talk/contribs} 20:48, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

This user using these ips has been editing and reverting the same articles User:Srkris used to edit. He is also leaving fake warning messages in other users talk pages: [1], [2]. This is in clear violation of the one week block handed down for consistent violation of a number of policies. - Parthi ^{talk/contribs} 22:29, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Comment I endorse this request as the admin who performed the user block. Durova^Charge! 02:46, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Declined. Mackensen (talk) 14:22, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Comment: It is not clear why this request was declined. If it is due to lack of diffs, here are some which clearly shows that this user identifies with the blocked editor:

1. 59.92.83.63 (talk • contribs • WHOIS • block user • block log • checkip) [3] - acceptance that he is User:Srkris and is breaking the block
2. 59.92.83.63 [4] - incivility
3. 59.92.83.63 [5] - reverting copyvio notices and questioning the validity of WP guidelines. WP:COI
4. 59.92.87.43 (talk • contribs • WHOIS • block user • block log • checkip) [6] - incivlity
5. 59.92.87.43 [7] - incivility and acceptance that he is user:Srkris
6. 59.92.87.43 [8] - acceptance that he is user:Srkris
7. 59.92.46.252 (talk • contribs • WHOIS • block user • block log • checkip) [9] - Personal attacks
8. 59.92.46.252 [10] - disputing blatent copyvio and questioning the validity of WP guidelines.
9. 59.92.46.252 [11] - reverting copyvio notices
10. 59.92.46.252 [12] - Incivility
11. 59.92.46.252 [13] - reverting blatent copyvio notice
12. 59.92.46.252 [14] - WP:COI violations and the acceptance that he is User:Srkris
13. 59.92.46.252 [15] - reverting copyvio notice
14. 59.92.63.37 (talk • contribs • WHOIS • block user • block log • checkip) [16] - Personal attacks and vandalising my User page
15. 59.92.63.37 [17] - Fake warnings in my talk page
16. 59.92.63.37 [18] - acceptance that he is User:Srkris
17. 59.92.50.88 (talk • contribs • WHOIS • block user • block log • checkip) [19] - Incivility and acceptance that he is User:Srkris
18. [20], [21], [22],[23] - 3RR violations using anon edits

Thanks Parthi ^{talk/contribs} 22:16, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Declined. Absent a serious policy violation we cannot "out" IP addresses. Mackensen (talk) 01:44, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

WP:NPA, WP:AGF, WP:COPY, WP:COI, WP:3RR, WP:Vandal, etc cited above are not policy violations? Parthi ^{talk/contribs} 01:49, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

You've overlooked "serious." Mackensen (talk) 02:22, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Am I to understand that avoidance of blocks by editing anonymously is not a serious breach of policy? Can you also please direct me to the policy which clearly defines the circumstances for a valid checkuser? thanks Parthi ^{talk/contribs} 02:49, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Clerk assistance required: This request has been denied, and will be staying that way. Please archive this before it escalates any further. Those interested can find the Board-approved checkuser policy at m:Checkuser policy. Essjay (Talk) 05:24, 11 December 2006 (UTC)