Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Repartee

[edit] Repartee

• Repartee (talk • contribs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• Top Drawer (talk • contribs)
• Bottom Drawer (talk • contribs)

I don't think checkuser is needed, as it's fairly obvious that Top Drawer is a sockpuppet of Repartee by looking at their contributions. Nothing but vandalism and nonsense. --Aude (talk | contribs) 17:10, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

A CheckUser should still be done to weed out other sock puppets. --Nlu (talk) 19:45, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

Good idea. This user has been quite persistent and there certainly might be other sockpuppets. --Aude (talk | contribs) 22:12, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

I've compiled a list of potential sock puppets for this user. See Repartee (talk • contribs) for details. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Yankees76 (talk • contribs).

User:Bottom Drawer, another suspected sockpuppet of Repartee, has shown up today with the same vandalism behavior. --Aude (talk | contribs) 19:40, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

Clerk note: Closed without action (stale). Thatcher131

[edit] Repartee (talk • contribs) and many more recent suspected sockpuppets

I am reposting this request from February, which was archived and closed as stale. This user/vandal has reappeared since then under 20 different user names and IP addresses — most recently as Deliciously Witty on March 29. I realize that the records don't go back as far as Repartee's last edits, but many accounts are more recent. Here is a list of suspected Repartee sockpuppets and dates of last edits:

1. 198.20.32.49 (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log) - February 15 (IP is from Thames Valley School District)
2. 67.158.65.186 (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log) - February 15 (IP is from Execulink Internet Services Corporation - Burgessville, Ontario)
3. 70.50.40.11 (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log) - February 15
4. 198.20.32.69 (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log) - February 16 (IP is from Thames Valley School District)
5. Top_Drawer (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log) - February 16
6. TrevorMcKillop (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log) - February 16
7. Bottom_Drawer (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log) - February 17
8. Middle_Drawer (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log) - February 20
9. Haitian (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log) - February 20
10. 67.158.72.158 (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log) - February 21 (IP is from Execulink Internet Services Corporation - Burgessville, Ontario)
11. Elvis_costello (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log) - February 27
12. EddieMoney (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log) - February 28
13. Glockenspiel (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log) - March 3
14. Parliament_funkadelic (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log) - March 3
15. WitticiousFiend (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log) - March 14
16. 67.158.73.213 (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log) - March 21 (IP is from Execulink Internet Services Corporation - Burgessville, Ontario)
17. Captainfantastic (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log) - March 27
18. 198.20.32.254 (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log) - March 28 (IP is from Thames Valley School District)
19. Deliciously Witty (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log) - March 29
20. Ohgoodrepartee (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log) - March 30

More details and evidence of similar editing patterns are on User talk:Repartee. My suspicions are that Repartee is editing from home, connected via Execulink, and editing from school, merely to be annoying and trolling. If checkuser verifies this, I'm not sure what can/should be done. Should we block the school or range of IPs from account creation? Perhaps, I'd rather just deal with each sockpuppet than block innocent users. From time to time, I've searched through recent change logs to find edits from these IP ranges, however, there's no way I know of to flag new accounts created from certain IP ranges (would be nice if we could?). Please advise on how such cases are generally handled and if necessary, do checkuser. --Aude (talk | contribs) 15:33, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

• Declined. These are throw-away accounts. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 18:52, 31 March 2006 (UTC)