Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/RJII

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).
If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/RJII}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

[edit] RJII

It is suspected that TheIndividualist (talk • contribs) and IndividualistAnarchist (talk • contribs) are the same person. Furthermore that judging by the similarity of the edits made by these users to those of banned user RJII that they may be sockpuppets of him. Having said this the latter will likely be difficult to prove. This is the second (or third case), previous IPs etc. may be found here. - FrancisTyers · 17:55, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Update - TheIndividualist and IndividualistAnarchist are the same person (Haha I should have checked the contributions more thoroughly, "(cur) (last) 17:12, 31 July 2006 IndividualistAnarchist (Talk | contribs | block) (moving over to the other username)" [1]. - FrancisTyers · 18:04, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Clerk note: IndividualistAnarchist admits to being one of the editors behind the RJII group account [2]. (What to do about it is a question for another forum.) Unless there is some other reason justifying a technical investigation, I will mark this as closed. Thatcher131 (talk) 21:21, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.



The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.


[edit] RJII

Anyone who has been following the guy's activities for the past 2 years, especially the past few days, should realise the need in this. If not, see

The sockpuppets must be found and banned. -- infinity0 10:32, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Possible IPs (please CU these also)

RJII's "harassers"

RJII's IPs

Update: RJII was blocked indefinitely for being a shared account two days ago, by Admin Jeffery O. Gustafon. However all accounts by the RJII "team" will likely be undectable and un-check-user-verifiable, due to "home" computers, etc. We need some sort of "Wikipedia Abuse Policy Team" to look after any of these "advanced techniques of psychological warfare, including intimidation, and game theory" and hunt down any incidents of "manipulation of administrators and arbitrators". This may go deeper than we think... Sincerely, Logical2u (Wikibreak) 16:10, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
Also, there's a discussion ongoing at WP:AN/Iover not only his block but also his "grandiose claims". I'm a bit harried to check his contributions, but if this checkuser turns up positive, seems like it might be a little bit closer to unraveling his comments. I enjoy Sidaway's comment as a good summary: Take this with a bushel of salt. Logical2u (Wikibreak) 16:34, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Note: Nothing direct comes up. Given the nature of the account, that doesn't surprise me. If given specific accounts to compare against I could be more helpful. Mackensen (talk) 23:05, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Second Request

As suggested on Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Infinity0/Proposed decision. -- infinity0 15:30, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

I would just like to point out to edits like these: [13][14] which were done at the same time. Also, I believe that RJII is US citizen and I'm from opposite part of the world. -- Vision Thing -- 16:35, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
If those do get checked, I would suggest checking C-Liberal (talk • contribs • block user • block log • checkuser) at the same time; User:C-Liberal appeared just after RJII's account was banned and immediately dove into his areas of interest to support his favored positions... I wouldn't normally mention an account with so few edits, but I assume the effort of checking is less if it's done when other accounts are already being examined. Oh, and then there's RJII'sSockPuppet (talk • contribs • block user • block log • checkuser), but that account has already been blocked pending evidence from them that they are, in fact, RJII and not an impersonator. I thought it couldn't hurt to mention them for the sake of completeness, though. --Aquillion 20:17, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Unrelated Mackensen (talk) 20:49, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.


Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../r/e/q/Wikipedia%7ERequests_for_checkuser_Case_RJII_e4e5.html"