Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Nobs01 or TJive

[edit] Nobs01 or TJive?

• TJive (talk • contribs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• Nobs01 (talk • contribs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• YINever (talk • contribs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• 141.153.74.246 (talk • contribs • WHOIS • block user • block log • checkip)

An anonymous user 141.153.74.246 is editing in a pattern that suggests it may be the banned User:Nobs01, who is banned due to an Arbcom decision. I am not sure, and would like it checked. I believe User:Nobs01 has returned in the past under a variety of sockpuppets. User:TJive, who used to tag team edit with User:Nobs01, sent me an off-Wiki e-mail claiming to be U141.153.74.246. Then, a new user User:YINever appeared with the same editing list and editing pattern. If it is TJive or Nobs01 or just one, what is happening is sockpuppetry to mask POV revert warring and potential 3RR avoidance.--Cberlet 16:25, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

First of all, it is a lie to state that I sent you an "off-Wiki e-mail" as I sent it through my verified address, else I would not have any access to you in the first place.

Second, the (brief) contents of that e-mail, though they do not serve in my disfavor (else I would not have sent it), were written in the expectation that you would have the decency to keep the matter private. I sent it so as to dispel your peculiar notion that Nobs had returned (e.g. here and here for reference, though you have now deleted the latter). I, perhaps naively, expected the courtesy of the matter being closed. Rather you have exacerbated it on a flimsy pretext.

You have provided absolutely no evidence that there is a tie between Nobs and the other accounts, nor any involved policy violations on the part of the latter, and so this report is a highly inappropriate abuse of CheckUser in order to push a content dispute into other realms which do not concern the articles in question. That you would describe edits of a user you disagree with as being "POV revert warring" proves nothing but that you are engaged in an argument over the very question of appropriate content and your accusation of "potential 3RR avoidance" is speculation based on absolutely nothing, certainly not my rather spotless record in that regard. --TJive 21:59, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Declined. Nobs hasn't edited in six months; it's well known we don't keep logs going back that far. Regarding TJive and YINever, absent an alleged policy violation there's no reason to investigate at this time. Mackensen (talk) 16:33, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

I note for the record that a number of comments were deleted, leaving primarily an attack on me. See: [1]. I do not understand why this is considered ethical.--Cberlet 20:52, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

TJive and YINever have ADMITTED to being the same person. See above. They have violated the 3RR. --RevolverOcelotX 04:33, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Diffs please. That is, diffs showing abuse and the users committing the abuse in conjunction. Mackensen (talk) 22:55, 5 June 2006 (UTC)