Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Mattisse

[edit] Mattisse

• Mattisse (talk • contribs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• Timmy12 (talk • contribs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• MaxReg (talk • contribs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• InnerJustice (talk • contribs • block user • block log • checkuser) - this user has been blocked for inappropriate tagging, but has also been removing the same citations being removed by Timmy12, for example: [1]
• Xampt (talk • contribs • block user • block log • checkuser) per Metros232 below
• 66.19.77.117 (talk • contribs • WHOIS • block user • block log • checkip) - edits with edit comments similar to Timmy12's to same article as Timmy12 had tagged. [2]

• Code letter: F
• Block record: [3]

Filed at recommendation of TenOfAllTrades based on discussion here. This is a followup on inconclusive sockpuppet complaint Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Mattisse (3rd). Suspected puppet is stalking Rosencomet and undoing all his edits. Rosencomet was previously harassed in similar ways by Mattisse who is currently blocked for 3RR, so if this is a sock, she is currently using to evade a ban. Further info on previous socks of Mattisse:

• Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Mattisse
• Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Mattisse (2nd)
• Further supporting evidence:
  • edit comment - starts calling removing tags "vandalism" at the same time Mattisse does
  • ditto
  • adds a "personal file" of an incident involving Mattisse but not Timmy12
  • titles notes section "Reference notes" just as Mattisse has been doing on multiple articles she has created.
  • Timmy12 identifies Aguerriero and Notinasnaid as editors who have reverted his tags, when actually they reverted Mattisse's tags [4] [5]. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Aguerriero (talk • contribs).

Ekajati (yakity-yak) 16:00, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Addition: I'd like to make an addition to this RFCU regarding Mattisse. I would like to add Xampt (talk • contribs • block user • block log • checkuser) to the list of sockpuppets of Mattisse per her conversation with me on my talk page. The editing patterns are pretty much the same: tagging lots of citations needed, India-related topics, interest in the Fidel Castro article, and a return to the talk pages of several users she had issues with in the past. Metros232 22:01, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Comment: "A more pertinent issue to examine might be the probable linkspamming by Rosencomet (talk • contribs) of his website, often using the claim that they're "citations". --Calton | Talk 00:45, 26 October 2006 (UTC)" I am adding this from Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents (section) - Stalking, vandalism, possible sockpuppetry evasion of block by Timmy12 Mattisse(talk) 03:25, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Clerk note: Although that may be an issue, this is an RFCU, and therefore the actions of anyone not listed on the users-to-be-checked list is irrelevant. If you have a problem with another user, please use WP:DR. Any further comments which deviate from the subject of this RFCU may be moved to the talk page. Daniel.Bryant 11:03, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Comment: I urge acceptance of this checkuser request. Something is amiss here. That's not to say there isn't a seperate issue of link spamming, however. --kingboyk 12:28, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

• Xampt Confirmed, no others. Dmcdevit·t 07:05, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Sorry to sound so dense, but what are you confirming, exactly? Depending on how you read it, this post is confirming that something is amiss, that Xampt is a sockpuppet, or that there is linkspamming going on. Would you mind expanding this comment a bit? Sorry, no need to answer. I figured out the context. Maury 01:56, 28 October 2006 (UTC)